Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

I'll say it again: The traffic loading requirements leave the squatters open to a legal challenge. On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Rory Conaway wrote: > Wow, you are dead on Faisal. Govnet is filing for everything they can > find in Arizona now with absolutely no

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

Wow, you are dead on Faisal. Govnet is filing for everything they can find in Arizona now with absolutely no customers and no chance of getting customers. Even if customers were there, they don't have a sales division, don't answer the phone, and don't respond to email. This is what happens

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

On 4/14/17 5:09 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > I would love to be more 'educated' in this matter... > > How exactly is this achieved in real world ? > I have been told that if another operator is using that channel & polarity, I > cannot use it in the other direction... > > So, technically it is

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

I would love to be more 'educated' in this matter... How exactly is this achieved in real world ? I have been told that if another operator is using that channel & polarity, I cannot use it in the other direction... So, technically it is feasible, but practically how is this accomplished ?

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

On 4/14/17 3:18 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > and BTW, in regards to Mimosa B11 they get a pass for being a channel > hog... because they also allow you to reuse the channel in a different > direction due to GPS Sync capabilities .. yes it does not help if you are > not using non Mimosa

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

Haha.. Hearing that from a WISP it tends to be an oxymoron... We don't think twice about throwing up a sector with a 20mhz or 40mhz channel sometimes to just serve one customer? How come conservation does not apply in this scenario ? So, if everyone was so worried about conserving

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.03 firmware still has some bugs

I wish there was more transparency in the release notes. I know they're protecting their intellectual property, but it's difficult for us to make a decision about a release's improvements and relevance to our network when the heading of "stability improvement" clearly

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.03 firmware still has some bugs

On 4/5/2017 1:20 PM, James Craig via Ubnt_users wrote: Thanks for the additional reports guys. I have forwarded to the devs for review. If experiencing any trouble/reduced performance when upgrading to 6.0.3, please grab the AP and STA support file(before reboot/downgrade) and let me know.

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

On 4/14/2017 10:00 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: Eh, not in my area anyway. In my area it really is all of the independent users. Here's some screen shots of the amount of 11 near me. It isn't a bunch of 160 channels, it's just a lot of channels. - Mike Hammett My sympathies for that map,

Re: [Ubnt_users] Part 101 Spectrum Grab (was 4096 QAM)

I only have and will use Liz Creekmore for coordination. It's down to a science. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:01 AM, wrote: > +1000 > > On Apr 14, 2017, at 06:08, Mike Hammett

Re: [Ubnt_users] Part 101 Spectrum Grab (was 4096 QAM)

+1000 > On Apr 14, 2017, at 06:08, Mike Hammett wrote: > > Coordination? Liz and only Liz. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > From: "Chris Soiles" > To:

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

Everybody having that attitude is what causes the problem in the first place, Faisal. On 4/13/2017 10:35 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > "Conserve Spectrum" > "Waste of Resources" > "Spectrum Efficiency". > > Where are you folks living ? Dream Land ? .. > > When are going to wake up

Re: [Ubnt_users] Part 101 Spectrum Grab (was 4096 QAM)

Coordination? Liz and only Liz. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Chris Soiles" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

Agreed. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Faisal Imtiaz" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 10:35:39 PM

Re: [Ubnt_users] Part 101 Spectrum Grab (was 4096 QAM)

cost of freq coordination ? paying someone $600 /$700 to get a 10 year license ? ( + FCC fee ) Really :) Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net >

Re: [Ubnt_users] Part 101 Spectrum Grab (was 4096 QAM)

I agree with the spectrum grab, my problem is the cost of frequency coordination, what is everyone doing for coord? Doing it yourself? Any hardware vendors absorbing some of it, making it affordable? Any kind of subscription type consultants, x$ per month and you get x number of assistance to