Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Rocket M5 AC Gen2 dead LAN port?

Cable was fine and pretty sure it didn't take a surge. It's been running off a Netonix. On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Shawn C. Peppers < videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Either a cable or it took a surge or lightning hit. > > Shawn C. Peppers > Video Direct > 866-680-8433

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT Rocket M5 AC Gen2 dead LAN port?

Either a cable or it took a surge or lightning hit. Shawn C. Peppers Video Direct 866-680-8433 Toll Free http://www.video-direct.tv > On Jul 10, 2017, at 11:25 PM, Mike Lyon wrote: > > Anyone seen a LAN port die on a Rocket M5 AC Gen2 radio? deployed one about a > month

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick

Do we know for sure it's a legal brick? Why would a vendor break their own hardware by killing it and prevent another vendor firmware from installing on it? This sounds more like a malware issue to me. Sure am glad i don't automatically update. Can I get a confirmation on this question?

[Ubnt_users] UBNT Rocket M5 AC Gen2 dead LAN port?

Anyone seen a LAN port die on a Rocket M5 AC Gen2 radio? deployed one about a month ago and then suddenly, the LAN port died on it. LAN light on radio lights up but I don't get any link to an device I plug it into. I tried resetting it, still no love. PoE still works and all lights light up on it.

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick

Mikrotik 2011LS v6.39.2 and a mikrotik ccr1009-8g-1s-1s+ v6.39.2 Shawn C. Peppers Video Direct 866-680-8433 Toll Free http://www.video-direct.tv > On Jul 10, 2017, at 8:56 PM, James Craig wrote: > > Shawn: Just checked and I haven't seen any similar bug reports. Can you >

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick

I have had two radios that the LAN quit passing data but POE is fine Also opened a ticket and was told to go to site and TFTP the radios. One was 45 minutes west the hour was an hour NorthEast SO went and changed them out ans in a box they sit. It will be something major to up date all my

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick

Shawn: Just checked and I haven't seen any similar bug reports. Can you forward me the AP and STA .sup (ja...@ubnt.com) and I'll take a look? What are you using for routers? On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Shawn C. Peppers < videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems as though it may

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick

It seems as though it may be breaking ospfis anyone else experiencing this? I sent this the other day Im not sure of its bug but i did just have a odd issue where i have a AP running mixed mode 8.3 and when i updated a XM station to 6.06 the ospf was stuck in exchange state. I had to

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick

Hi Guys, We implemented FW signing to improve device security as a result of THIS report (and a few others). This malware would masquerade as 6.0.3, but in reality, it was based on the 5.5.2 SDK.

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick

When you can't compete technically, you compete legally... Shortly thereafter you wonder why your foot has a hole in it... On 07/10/2017 12:45 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote: > It seems that this upgrade isn't an upgrade at all. It's driven by > lawyers requiring that you do an electronic signature

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick

They probably ought to look into the Lexmark case before they go too far. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Forbes Mercy" To: "ubnt users"

[Ubnt_users] 6.0.6 isn't an upgrade, it's a legal brick

It seems that this upgrade isn't an upgrade at all. It's driven by lawyers requiring that you do an electronic signature that you agree to not use Cambium Elevate software on this device. Pretty odd since it's my radio, well past warranty so I can do what I want to it. Is this the direction