*From: *"Chris Soiles" <csoi...@riocities.net>
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> *Sent: *Friday, April 14, 2017 6:50:02 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Part 101 Spectrum Grab (was 4096 QAM)
>
> I agree with the spectrum grab, my p
;
> From: "Chris Soiles" <csoi...@riocities.net>
> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 6:50:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Part 101 Spectrum Grab (was 4096 QAM)
>
> I agree with the spectrum grab, my problem
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 6:50:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Part 101 Spectrum Grab (was 4096 QAM)
I agree with the spectrum grab, my problem is the cost of frequency
coordination, what is everyone doing for coord?
Doing it yourself?
Any hardware vendors absorbing some of it,
.net
> From: "Chris Soiles" <csoi...@riocities.net>
> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 7:50:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Part 101 Spectrum Grab (was 4096 QAM)
> I agree with the spectrum grab, my pr
I agree with the spectrum grab, my problem is the cost of frequency
coordination, what is everyone doing for coord?
Doing it yourself?
Any hardware vendors absorbing some of it, making it affordable?
Any kind of subscription type consultants, x$ per month and you get x
number of assistance to
Waking up a bit late here as well, and we're *seriously* rural (second
least populated county in the sixth least populated state in the nation).
The power company and the mine both have all manner of dual-pol 40 MHz
links on 6 GHz and 11 GHz running hither and yon. 400+ mbits full duplex
to a
