Can someone remind me. Do we have a timeline for getting newer GDAL and
QGIS into ubuntugis-unstable?
Seems to me -stable should be where the LTS version of QGIS gets put.
Thanks,
Alex
___
UbuntuGIS mailing list
Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo
On 2016-02-11 17:32, Alex Mandel wrote:
Can someone remind me. Do we have a timeline for getting newer GDAL and
QGIS into ubuntugis-unstable?
Speaking about GDAL only, it seems unlikely to happen before Debian
makes the switch to GDAL 2.0.
The packaging is available in the Debian GIS git rep
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> On 2016-02-11 17:32, Alex Mandel wrote:
>>
>> Can someone remind me. Do we have a timeline for getting newer GDAL and
>> QGIS into ubuntugis-unstable?
We mostly need people to do it. Currently osgeo live is more up to
date than ubuntugis. I
On 02/12/2016 11:08 AM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
On 2016-02-11 17:32, Alex Mandel wrote:
Can someone remind me. Do we have a timeline for getting newer GDAL and
QGIS into ubuntugis-unstable?
We mostly need people to do it. Currently osgeo
On 12-02-16 10:08, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> Energy should now probably be spent in making sure that Xerial, the
> next LTS release is well tested and has the packages we want. The
> debian import freeze is later this month, so now is the last time to
> act.
The DebianImportFreeze is scheduled fo
On 12-02-16 16:42, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 12-02-16 10:08, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
>> Energy should now probably be spent in making sure that Xerial, the
>> next LTS release is well tested and has the packages we want. The
>> debian import freeze is later this month, so now is the last t
