Re: Voice Recognition for Linux

2007-02-23 Thread Eric S. Johansson
Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote: > Eric S. Johansson wrote: > Looks like the original text got caught in a spam filter somewhere > because of the attachment (I found it in the web archives). No worries > about the tone. We are having a frank technical discussion and need to > speak directly to get our

Re: Voice Recognition for Linux

2007-02-23 Thread Chris Hayes
Interesting ideas. I'm fond of having a voice recognition front end that several different systems/engines could be plugged into. I consulted my father about this in order to figure out where NS and VV's GUI lets him down. Unfortunatly, as I've said - I make time out of nowhere - and it was pretty

Accerciser 0.1.0 (stretch)

2007-02-23 Thread Peter Parente
Accerciser is an interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop. It uses AT-SPI to inspect and control widgets, allowing you to check if an application is providing correct information to assistive technologies and automated test frameworks. Accerciser has a simple plugin framework

Re: Voice Recognition for Linux

2007-02-23 Thread Henrik Nilsen Omma
Eric S. Johansson wrote: > Eric S. Johansson wrote: >> as I was constructing my response, and was almost finished when it >> hit me about what's wrong with the model proposed. it is the >> equivalent of raw natural text. Full function natural text sucks a >> little bit. The broken, unable to

Re: Voice Recognition for Linux

2007-02-23 Thread Eric S. Johansson
Eric S. Johansson wrote: > as I was constructing my response, and was almost finished when it hit > me about what's wrong with the model proposed. it is the equivalent of > raw natural text. Full function natural text sucks a little bit. The > broken, unable to correct consistently, natural

Re: Voice Recognition for Linux

2007-02-23 Thread Eric S. Johansson
as I was constructing my response, and was almost finished when it hit me about what's wrong with the model proposed. it is the equivalent of raw natural text. Full function natural text sucks a little bit. The broken, unable to correct consistently, natural text is horrible and ruins voice

Re: Voice Recognition for Linux

2007-02-23 Thread Henrik Nilsen Omma
Eric S. Johansson wrote: > this is one half of the solution needed. Not only do you need to > propagate text to Linux but you need to provide enough context back to > windows so that NaturallySpeaking can select different grammars. It > would be nice to also modify the text injected in to Linu