Hi Bret!
Very nice wallpapers. But i think the koala is a little bit big.
-- Eredeti üzenet --
Feladó: bret sheppard lt;bretco...@yahoo.comgt;Címzett:
ubuntu-...@lists.ubuntu.commásolat: Elküldve: 06:09Téma: [ubuntu-art] karmic
koala
Hi, I thought you might like these. I'm highly
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 19:42 -0700, Smartboy wrote:
So are we, as a team, going to criticize others of our team because
they are tied to one program? I thought freedom was not only freedom
in what you can choose on Linux, but freedom to use what you want. By
trying to force people to use only
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 22:01 -0700, David Holland wrote:
Well i guess the question is
What does ubuntu stand for ?
Freedom
or
Restrections (windows tm)
Freedom to do what you want, create what you want as long as no one
gets hert and we vote on everything
Restricted we tell
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 23:51 -0400, Ryan Prior wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Cory K. coryis...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I believe that *all* submissions for official art or projects under the
art team be created with free tools.
This does not go far enough. We should only accept
On Saturday 11 April 2009 21:04:59 Cory K. wrote:
This is something I thought about before but was reminded of so here goes.
I believe that *all* submissions for official art or projects under the
art team be created with free tools.
While that would be nice, it is unrealistic. We have to
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 19:48 -0700, Smartboy wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Cory K. coryis...@ubuntu.com wrote:
We are a listless bunch. Very little direction and nothing to hold us
together. (sorry to be critical. I think we need more of it)
I was rolling around the idea of an
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 22:31 -0700, bret sheppard wrote:
Hi bret here. I thought this was an interesting idea.
Maybe for the alpha releases, if the guys at Canonical could manage to
approve such an idea in what little time is left till the alphas ;)
Would need a good execution, though.
--
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 22:06 -0700, Smartboy wrote:
Perhaps make them brown instead of green? That way it blends into
Ubuntu's default color scheme.
From
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2009-February/000536.html
Brown has served us well but the Koala is considering
First off i am not saying it should be free in every sense of the word, that
would be chaos.
Structure is good,and also i don't think anyone feels forced to contribute
artwork to Ubuntu.
We are all here by choice, because we choose Ubuntu out of the hundreds of
Linux distros to apply our
On Sunday 12 April 2009 10:52:48 Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 23:51 -0400, Ryan Prior wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Cory K. coryis...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I believe that *all* submissions for official art or projects under the
art team be created with free tools.
On Sunday 12 April 2009 10:52:48 Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 23:51 -0400, Ryan Prior wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Cory K. coryis...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I believe that *all* submissions for official art or projects under the
art team be created with free tools.
Hi!
Those who know a bit about GTK theming: please check
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Documentation/GTK-Themes
including the linked material, and correct or remove outdated or no
longer relevant information (or tell me what to change).
Additions are of course also very much welcome.
--
Hi!
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Documentation/Updating
Is this correct and relevant?
Or is there perhaps a guide we can link to instead?
--
Thorsten Wilms
thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
В 13:54 +0200 на 12.04.2009 (нд), Thorsten Wilms написа:
Additions are of course also very much welcome.
I've made some. Can you check them for grammer and spelling because I'm
not sure for some things.
Anton
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
So while there are various opinions on this subject, I started Art
council/open team thread to try to address the fact that there's nobody
that can really make things official. Sure, there's trusted folks around
here like myself and Thorsten that are a loose council but really who
the hell am I?
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Thorsten Wilms t...@freenet.de wrote:
Hi!
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Documentation/Updating
Is this correct and relevant?
Or is there perhaps a guide we can link to instead?
I'm not so sure it is very relevant, especially the part about editing
IMO using free tools is fundamental to community developed effort. Using
something else means going it alone.
The following comment used to live in the
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Documentation/CommunityThemes
page but I don't see it now.
Submissions should be made in formats that can be
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 11:55 -0400, John Baer wrote:
IMO using free tools is fundamental to community developed effort. Using
something else means going it alone.
Spot on.
The following comment used to live in the
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Documentation/CommunityThemes
page but
Hi
You might remember Kenneth Wimer published some background guidelines
for Jaunty
(http://anotherubuntu.blogspot.com/2009/02/create-wallpaper-for-ubuntu-904.html)
back in February. This was a great move because of the lack of
organized effort in the artwork. I know that Canonical will be
I'll do that linking if you want.
Ben
From: Thorsten Wilms t...@freenet.de
To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Sent: Sunday, 12 April, 2009 17:58:41
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Mandating usage of free tools.
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 11:55 -0400, John Baer wrote:
IMO
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Cory K. coryis...@ubuntu.com wrote:
This is something I thought about before but was reminded of so here goes.
I believe that *all* submissions for official art or projects under the
art team be created with free tools.
No more wallpapers done with
I would say that with both Hardy and Intrepid the way mascots was
included in the artwork was truly art and worked out fantastically.
I'm just guessing but I imagine that decision was Jaunty specific, You
can draw a Heron and a Ibex, and majestic and element animals. Whereas
whichever way you
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 10:20 -0700, Ben Crisford wrote:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/SubmissionGuidelines#Formats
BTW, I would appreciate if someone could take over the job of linking
the formats (XCF, SVG and so on) to pages where they are explained.
Wikipedia pages might be
I added Impression to Launchpad @ https://launchpad.net/impression .
Currently a 192x192px image titled product-mugshot is displayed to the
left.
https://launchpad.net/@@/product-mugshot
How does one change this image?
Thanks,
John
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 10:32 -0700, Smartboy wrote:
I edited https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Documentation/Software to
include the results of this discussion here. Read through it and see
if it is a good compromise.
The edit:
These tools are recommended to be used if you want your work to be
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Thorsten Wilms t...@freenet.de wrote:
We recommended the following tools for creating artwork. They are all
free software (free as in speech) and can be obtained by everyone at
virtually no cost without any licensing-hassle. This simplifies sharing
files and
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 15:45 -0400, Ryan Prior wrote:
I like your edit better. It is in the spirit of encouraging the use of
free software and pointing out what free software is available, while
not explicitly discouraging users of other software from contributing.
Well, I tried to keep the
Cory,
You are a well respected member of this team and your opinions and/or
concerns are appreciated. I believe your desire is the group of folks
who subscribe to this list and are collectively referred to as the
Artwork Team discover additional ways to add value to Ubuntu.
I support that
28 matches
Mail list logo
