It would be aviable soon.
EU rules practilly take care of that.
2010/2/18 François Degrave
> Thorsten Wilms a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:13 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I'd rather think this is because Adobe has nothing to do with pdf
> >> anymore; I still think that no
Thorsten Wilms a écrit :
> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:13 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
>
>
>> I'd rather think this is because Adobe has nothing to do with pdf
>> anymore; I still think that no reference to an app should appear in a
>> file icon if this app is not installed and meant to deal wi
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:13 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
> I'd rather think this is because Adobe has nothing to do with pdf
> anymore; I still think that no reference to an app should appear in a
> file icon if this app is not installed and meant to deal with this kind
> of files. I truly th
True but that can be depending on the PDF program wich your standard I use
xPDF.
But I don't know I use Linux too practilly edit everything in my own habbit
so what is the use of the icons I have Office 2007 via Play On Linux.then it
runs and you see difference in Icons cause it's a windows compabl
Kenneth Wimer a écrit :
>
> On Wednesday 17 February 2010 06:17:12 pm Vishnoo wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:44 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
>
> > > Vishnoo a écrit :
>
> > > > On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:18 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
>
> > > >> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:04 +0100, François
The biggest reason it's better too recognize.
If you got ten thousand icons for 1 sort of file it get's anoying and
confusing.
On 17 February 2010 16:38, Merk wrote:
>
> I'm not asking why the OS X was directly copied instead of either Windows
> one. I'm asking why any existing Word icon was co
