It would be aviable soon. EU rules practilly take care of that. 2010/2/18 François Degrave <fdegr...@gmail.com>
> Thorsten Wilms a écrit : > > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:13 +0100, François Degrave wrote: > > > > > >> I'd rather think this is because Adobe has nothing to do with pdf > >> anymore; I still think that no reference to an app should appear in a > >> file icon if this app is not installed and meant to deal with this kind > >> of files. I truly think that a file icon containing a "Adobe" logo means > >> to the user: if I open this, it will be launched in Adobe Reader. > >> > > > > > > I agree. However, it shouldn't be about what is installed. I'd say: a > > mime-type icon should, or rather may, only include or refer to an > > application icon, if that application is the only one that deals with > > that file-type (ability to open files in a text-editor or hex-viewer or > > similar doesn't count, of course). > > > I totally agree. That means doc, xls, ppt files should not refer to Ms > Office apps, neither should pdf refer to Adobe or psd to Photoshop -- ok > the last one is the only that can entirely deal with psd, however some > image viewers can render psd nicely and The Gimp can edit them to a > certain extend (plus it seems strange to have a reference in Linux to an > app that is not even available on this platform). > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > -- J.D. Jungschlager Telephone: +31647843040
-- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art