Cory K. wrote:
>
>
> And you're welcome to your opinion.
>
realizing this, lead me to the *atrocity* of having an opinion ;)
>>
>> choosing either way is OK, but when u "SET" a fixed lighting source from
>> above as the default, and choose to ignore it for *folders and action*
>> buttons, which
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 12:29 +0530, mac_v wrote:
> folders also have light from below...
There's still the assumption of light from above for the folders, as can
be seen from the shadow. It's just the addition of a glow-from-below
effect.
--
Thorsten Wilms
thorwil's design for free software:
ht
El lun, 08-06-2009 a las 05:12 -0400, Cory K. escribió:
> Style.
>
> > if those icons which the user is always going to be exposed to have
> > lighting from below , then all the rest of the icons which have the
> > light from above seem like the odd ones ! In my opinion this would
> be a
> > flaw
mac_v wrote:
> Cory K. wrote:
>
>> I do want to note that we *can* choose to do this at times. These are
>> buttons not actual objects like screens, folders and such.
>>
>
> folders also have light from below...
>
> choosing either way is OK, but when u "SET" a fixed lighting source from
>
Cory K. wrote:
>
> I do want to note that we *can* choose to do this at times. These are
> buttons not actual objects like screens, folders and such.
>
> -Cory K.
>
folders also have light from below...
choosing either way is OK, but when u "SET" a fixed lighting source from
above as the defau
mac_v wrote:
> Hi,
> >From what i have understood, the lighting for the icons are supposed to
> be from the top , and the only exception was made for the folder icons
> just to maintain continuity with the human icon folder, BUT why do *all*
> the action icons have the light source from the bottom?
daniel planas armangue wrote:
>
>
> Ok, i changed the red color for green ;)
>
> Daniel.P
>
>
took down my version from the wiki ... :)
but i think the lighting needs to be addressed for all the action icons
, spoke to Cory on the irc about the lighting, i think he might
considering ur old
El dom, 07-06-2009 a las 00:58 +0530, mac_v escribió:
> Kenneth Wimer wrote:
>
> >
> > Well, first off, you need to take my comments in perspective. I said
> > that using red in a panel icon should mean something, not just be for
> > the looks.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kenneth
> >
> >
>
> I had un
Kenneth Wimer wrote:
>
> Well, first off, you need to take my comments in perspective. I said
> that using red in a panel icon should mean something, not just be for
> the looks.
>
>
> --
> Kenneth
>
>
I had understood ur point about the use of red, before that day i didnt
realize that,
Taki
On Saturday 06 June 2009 17:45:29 mac_v wrote:
> daniel planas armangue wrote:
> > green color it had reserved for other icon "save as". with some
> > modifications to the arrow.
> >
> > The inspiration for red color comes from the gnome-colors and it works
> > very well.
> >
> > Daniel.P
>
> i th
daniel planas armangue wrote:
> green color it had reserved for other icon "save as". with some
> modifications to the arrow.
>
> The inspiration for red color comes from the gnome-colors and it works
> very well.
>
> Daniel.P
>
>
i think *kwwii* would strongly oppose the use of red!
he wa
El sáb, 06-06-2009 a las 12:40 +0530, mac_v escribió:
> Hi,
> >From what i have understood, the lighting for the icons are supposed to
> be from the top , and the only exception was made for the folder icons
> just to maintain continuity with the human icon folder, BUT why do *all*
> the action ico
Hi,
>From what i have understood, the lighting for the icons are supposed to
be from the top , and the only exception was made for the folder icons
just to maintain continuity with the human icon folder, BUT why do *all*
the action icons have the light source from the bottom? i'v found that
all the
13 matches
Mail list logo
