> Ok then. I want consistency. It's a *big* deal. So it comes down to
> which one of the 2 we have to use or if a ***3rd custom one should be done?***
> Which, in the end, is what I'd like to have.
>
> So my question is do we use 1 box for the package managers and mimes or
> draw the same box with
Am Montag, den 16.03.2009, 11:08 -0400 schrieb Cory K.:
> Oliver Scholtz wrote:
> >
>
> Ok then. I want consistency. It's a *big* deal. So it comes down to
> which one of the 2 we have to use or if a 3rd custom one should be done?
> Which, in the end, is what I'd like to have.
>
> So my question
Am Mittwoch, den 18.03.2009, 14:40 +0200 schrieb Anton Kerezov:
> About the perspective I meant the icon I'm attaching now. I tried to fix
> it a bit. What do you think?
Oh ah .. now I understand you :)
It was only a quick sketch. A symbol for update and download. But I
think it's a too confusing
Am Montag, den 16.03.2009, 21:36 +0200 schrieb Anton Kerezov:
> В 20:26 +0100 на 16.03.2009 (пн), Oliver Scholtz 1 написа:
> > I give up :)
>
> You give up too easy my friend.
>
Never ;) But my freetime is rare ...
>
> > In both the light comes from above. The papershadow is a bacic
> > Icon-Des
В 20:26 +0100 на 16.03.2009 (пн), Oliver Scholtz 1 написа:
> I give up :)
You give up too easy my friend.
> In both the light comes from above. The papershadow is a bacic
> Icon-Design. The disk means simply: "software". But okay I tried it ...
> if somebody makes it better, so go ahead. :)
Wha
Am Montag, den 16.03.2009, 20:49 +0200 schrieb Anton Kerezov:
> I think that both the debian logo and the update circle are not looking
> good in perspective at all. Also why is the scotch dropping shadow?
> Isn't it supposed to be tightly attached to the paper surface?
>
>
> Anton
>
>
I give
Oliver Scholtz wrote:
>
Ok then. I want consistency. It's a *big* deal. So it comes down to
which one of the 2 we have to use or if a 3rd custom one should be done?
Which, in the end, is what I'd like to have.
So my question is do we use 1 box for the package managers and mimes or
draw the same
I think that both the debian logo and the update circle are not looking
good in perspective at all. Also why is the scotch dropping shadow?
Isn't it supposed to be tightly attached to the paper surface?
Anton
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm
2009/3/16 Oliver Scholtz 1
> > I think that if you used Oliver's box with those sort of arrow glyphs,
> > it would look better and more Breathe-like.
>
> If doing it, so correct :)
> See my attach ... ;)
The up-and-down arrows say to me, "transfer" or "sync". The current "update
manager" icon i
Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote:
>> For system-software-install, I don't think that a down arrow looks
>> appropriate. Down makes me think "download".
You download the packages don't you? :) I would agree totally with your
thinking if we were talking about gDebi for just installing. Which I
think we need t
Am Montag, den 16.03.2009, 12:35 -0300 schrieb spg76:
> 2009/3/16 Oliver Scholtz 1
> > The other thing I noticed is that there are differences with
> the current
> > mime box. (http://tiny.cc/uvQmp) Color and little details
> like the tape.
> > Perspective d
2009/3/16 Oliver Scholtz 1
> > The other thing I noticed is that there are differences with the current
> > mime box. (http://tiny.cc/uvQmp) Color and little details like the tape.
> > Perspective debate aside, I want the box in system-update-install to
> > match in whatever way it can.
>
> This
Am Montag, den 16.03.2009, 08:22 -0400 schrieb Cory K.:
> My biggiest gripe with this is that it's use of the disk is different
> from the set. I want the set to use the same disk throughout the set so
> as to be consistent. Also because of this, themeatically,
> system-update-install doesn't feel
My biggiest gripe with this is that it's use of the disk is different
from the set. I want the set to use the same disk throughout the set so
as to be consistent. Also because of this, themeatically,
system-update-install doesn't feel a part of system-software-update.
The other thing I noticed is
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 15.03.2009, 10:49 +0100 schrieb Thorsten Wilms:
>> On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 03:41 +0100, Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote:
>> > Thorsten,
>> >
>> > One solution is ...
>> >
>> > Letting it down in their perspective and correct it from a
Am Sonntag, den 15.03.2009, 10:49 +0100 schrieb Thorsten Wilms:
> On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 03:41 +0100, Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote:
> > Thorsten,
> >
> > One solution is ...
> >
> > Letting it down in their perspective and correct it from above.
>
> Yes, generally making it so that you have optimal ang
On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 03:41 +0100, Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote:
> Thorsten,
>
> One solution is ...
>
> Letting it down in their perspective and correct it from above.
Yes, generally making it so that you have optimal angles for at least
one edge, rest all in correct perspective, is likely a good ide
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 23:01 +0100, Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote:
> Yes I know and you're right. For this I had a eye since I did my fist
> drawings with 5 years. :D
> The top is absolute correct. The bottom is only a little bit wrong.
> But
> it's really so important? Isn't it better to have a correct l
Thorsten,
One solution is ...
Letting it down in their perspective and correct it from above.
Sincerly O.S.
PS: Like it, but more I look and see the wrong perspective I think I
will correct it. :/
<>--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinf
Thorsten, Smartboy it's now aceptable?
Thorsten I hope I could argument you well why I took this decision for
no changing the perspective.
Sincerly Oliver Scholtz
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.
Keep up the good work,
everyone.
> From: scholli...@yahoo.de
> To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:01:17 +0100
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] system-update-install
>
> Am Samstag, den 14.03.2009, 22:05 +0100 schrieb Thorsten Wilms:
> > On S
Am Samstag, den 14.03.2009, 22:05 +0100 schrieb Thorsten Wilms:
> On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 17:05 +0100, Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote:
> > I uploaded to the wiki a new icon for system-update-install.
> > It's a early version open for discussion ;)
> >
> >
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 17:05 +0100, Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote:
> I uploaded to the wiki a new icon for system-update-install.
> It's a early version open for discussion ;)
>
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions
The box is neither in a vanishing point perspective, nor a stra
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote:
>
> I uploaded to the wiki a new icon for system-update-install.
> It's a early version open for discussion ;)
>
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions
>
> Sincerly Oliver Scholtz
>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
I uploaded to the wiki a new icon for system-update-install.
It's a early version open for discussion ;)
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions
Sincerly Oliver Scholtz
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
25 matches
Mail list logo
