2011/1/25 Thorsten Wilms
> You could remove or separate the leading numbers.
>
Agreed. They don't seem to be useful.
The table might look more interesting, but showing unnecessary information
> while not clearly separating the all important state is by no means
> well-designed.
>
Also agreed.
On 01/24/2011 01:54 PM, Сергей wrote:
The "Specs" page makes that categorizing even more
clear, but it's hard to read the names of the tasks. Besides, the table
looks much more professional and well-designed, which is also important
in our case.
You could remove or separate the leading numbers.
One more little thing to do: I think we should add a link to the projects
list to the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Tasks page, probably as the
first item of the list, or even before the list.
Three days seems to be the average response time in this thread, so if I
don't receive any objection in
2011/1/24 Thorsten Wilms
> The reason I decided against the table is that it's hard to edit and
> didn't make it obvious at a glance what is open or closed.
I know how important the KISS principle is for a wiki, but as long as our
pages aren't based on complex custom templates and we have peopl
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 14:31 +0300, Сергей wrote:
> The artwork page contained such a nice and clear table, and now it's
> gone :(
The reason I decided against the table is that it's hard to edit and
didn't make it obvious at a glance what is open or closed.
> As far as I understand, we just agre
The artwork page contained such a nice and clear table, and now it's gone :(
As far as I understand, we just agreed that something must be done, we
didn't discuss what exactly. As far as I know from my wiki administration
experience, edits of pages with high visibility must be very deliberate, so
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 20:09 +0530, Vishnoo wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 10:35 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Having both
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Tasks
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Specs
> > is bad, as keeping them up to date would be a waste of time.
> >
> > One
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 10:35 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Having both
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Tasks
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Specs
> is bad, as keeping them up to date would be a waste of time.
>
> One should go.
>
> I originally added the Tasks page to list what is n
Hi!
Having both
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Tasks
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Specs
is bad, as keeping them up to date would be a waste of time.
One should go.
I originally added the Tasks page to list what is now at:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/TasksOld
--
Thorsten Wilms
thorwil
