Jonathan Motes wrote:
> I was very confused as to why top-posting would be such an issue until
> I remembered that all email clients don't have this feature.
>
> For this reason, I vote for a forum. I think issues such as this one
> justify it's need.
This is a issue that pertains to the list. A f
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Álvaro Medina Ballester
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2008/4/30 Hylke Bons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I like the sub-teams idea. But I think it's a little unfair to let for
> > example 5 teams work on a full theme, while only one gets chosen.
> > Someone has to
2008/4/30 Hylke Bons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> I like the sub-teams idea. But I think it's a little unfair to let for
> example 5 teams work on a full theme, while only one gets chosen.
> Someone has to give clear direction, and not be afraid to approve or
> discard ideas in an early stage. I thi
Cory K. wrote:
> If people are putting work they would actually like to be considered on
> the wiki (like they are supposed to) nothing will get lost. That's
> usually is how it goes.
>
> This is why we need to get back to the "sub-teams" idea. People who like
> a particular concept work together t
Hylke Bons wrote:
> Damián Vila wrote:
>
>> Sadly, most of what you can read at this list are arguments or well
>> intentioned comments. Sometimes some words of encouragement, but
>> rarely something that really leads to significant progress.
>>
> I think it will. There are lot's of great
