7;t out of
place. I originally asked if anyone was interested helping out with
this. And now, I don't know who next to contact.
- Original Message
From: Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork
Sent: Sunday, April 6, 2008 3:13:34 PM
Subject: Re: [ubunt
Ubuntu artwork
Sent: Sunday, April 6, 2008 3:13:34 PM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] (RED)
I think that this has nothing to do with artwork and therefor this
conversation is totally out of place on this list.
--
Kenneth
On Sunday 06 April 2008 23:58:45 Brian wrote:
> Sorry, bit of a delayed respons
m? And what other lists/people should I
> contact about this?
>
> - Original Message
> From: Damián Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork
> Sent: Wednesday, April 2, 2008 1:48:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] (RED)
>
> Well, you
pril 2, 2008 1:48:10 AM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] (RED)
Well, you'll have to convince Canonical first, since they are the owners of the
Ubuntu brand.
But I wanted to stress that Ubuntu is *already* helping a lot of people in
Africa (and the rest of the world) to have access to technology by
rights abuses and power misuse -
which create many of the problems in the first place.
Just my five cents.
- Thomas L.G
> From: Damián Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 2008-04-02 10:48:10 CEST
> To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] (RED
Well, you'll have to convince Canonical first, since they are the owners of
the Ubuntu brand.
But I wanted to stress that Ubuntu is *already* helping a lot of people in
Africa (and the rest of the world) to have access to technology by offering
an open, clean and easy to use OS for free. Maybe it's
Am Mittwoch, den 02.04.2008, 00:12 -0700 schrieb Sumit Agarwal:
> Philosophically it certainly makes sense.
>
> More difficult is the question of how exactly it would work. (RED) works
> by allocating a portion of sales revenue to the charity. With Ubuntu
> being free, does that mean Canonical w
Philosophically it certainly makes sense.
More difficult is the question of how exactly it would work. (RED) works
by allocating a portion of sales revenue to the charity. With Ubuntu
being free, does that mean Canonical would need to donate a percentage
of their services revenue? Would Canonic
Brian wrote:
> Okay, so I don't know if anyone checks the brainstorm here, but I
> posted one (http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/6200/) about getting
> Ubuntu involved with (RED). Since it seems there's a fair amount of
> interest, I figured I'd go ahead and see if I could get some people
> involve
