I stumbled upon this theme on Gnome-Look. I really like the look of this
theme and I think it is similar to some of the mockups I've seen on this
mailing list.
Some things I like:
- I haven't been a big fan of the implementation of brown in Ubuntu,
but I think this theme pulls it off
Anyways, no having fun...
http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com/2008/01/things-get-silly-on-mailing-list.h
tml
Ha ha. That's the sound that bugs make as you swat them: 'Bzr... Svn! :D
Now back to work, you louts!
\d
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Anyways, no having fun...
http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com/2008/01/things-get-silly-on-mailing-list.ht
ml
Heh, good one :)
I wouldn't mind at all if an adapted version of that one would be chosen
instead of my dry work ;)
Might be a bit of a challenge to transfer that to 75px height, though.
Hi there,
Just made another photoshop-mockup, with some improvements and new
stuff. Probably all of it can't be considered improvements, but I just
wanna hear what you guys think. I have little experience with designing
user interfaces, and none whatsoever with creating linux-themes...
So
is there an icon theme to the creamy classic theme?
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
is there an icon theme to the creamy classic theme?
I don't think so, I use the Mac4Lin Leopard icons which can be found here:
http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Mac4Lin+Leopard+GTK+Icon+Theme?content=68413
Here is what my desktop looks like:
Werry good themes
2008/1/2, Thomas L.G [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi there,
Just made another photoshop-mockup, with some improvements and new
stuff. Probably all of it can't be considered improvements, but I just
wanna hear what you guys think. I have little experience with designing
user
A professional typographer is working on the Ubuntu Title font:
http://betatype.com/node/36
Now, that's a nice new year present... :-)
--
Jan Claeys
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Jan 2, 2008 10:09 PM, Thorsten Wilms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 23:31 +0100, Nicolas Deschildre wrote:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/ubuntu-brainstorm-5/
I prefer the old version. Of course I could try some tweaking.
I agree. In the second one, the arrows
I have seen a few mockups which seen to make use of blur. I was wondering if
anyone knew if it was going to be turned on in Hardy? Just wondering,
because I could add that to my mockups if it was (it would also worry me,
since not all graphics cards can handle it)..
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
I don't think it will be, because there are only a few graphic cards which
support it. Intel and the free ATI driver are not along them. But I'm just a
user and don't know any official decisions.
On Jan 2, 2008 11:28 PM, AA Boy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have seen a few mockups which seen to
well there is voting
one man, one vote
On Jan 2, 2008 6:02 PM, Justin Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whatever, that fact remains that there is no leadership or direction from
the people who can make any decisions. You seem to forget many people, such
as myself, are on here on their own time
tonic skrev:
well there is voting
one man, one vote
To be honest, I don't think that's enough. If anyone were to agitate for
a community-based organization of this work, it would be me (especially
since it politically suits my ideals perfectly... ehem). And I am! But
every organization
This is quite lengthy. If you can't read it all but are interested
then try just to look at the bits with ==?== in front of them -
they're questions that I hope as many people in the art-team as
possible should answer...
Wiki Page:
..on Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:01:26PM +1300, tonic wrote:
well there is voting
one man, one vote
agreed. it indicates /trends/ of interest, something not easily discernable
from
sprawling mailing list discussion.
as someone said earlier, there are many great ideas contributed to this list
julian wrote:
we need to see mockups in one place as opposed to scattered over several sites
and hidden as attachments in nests of threads:
This has been established at least thrice in my knowledge,
and at no point do people bother to tidy things up into
an organized manner.
The people who
tonic wrote:
well there is voting
one man, one vote
Hilarious. And yes, quite right.
sabdfl I suppose _does_ vote.
Sincerely,
TJS
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
By default, I don't believe so, but if the art team makes something that
might be considered worthwhile - the argument could probably be made to
support blur by default on powerful-enough machines. I'm unsure of who would
make that decision in the end - possibly Mark, I don't know.
On Jan 2, 2008
Dude you are just spinning your wheels, because I don't understand how
nything up to this point can be called brilliant. I don't claim to know what
to implement to get this project back on its feet. But the fact is that we
are more then two months into a six month release cycle without
No author of any theme is remotely aware of whether or not their submission
will make it into the final product.
I don't know that, if I turn one of my themes into a full-out GTK with
Emerald and Metacity, my time will have been worth it. While we are all
aware that Mark will decide the final
On Jan 3, 2008 2:29 AM, Ken Vermette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No author of any theme is remotely aware of whether or not their submission
will make it into the final product.
As Cory K just pointed out - this isn't true. No designer knows if
they will make the default. But we can ensure that
Who wrote:
How does a conventional 'vote for the one you like' allow us to see this?
Maybe you could vote 1...5 on each entry then look at the tally graphs
for distribution?
into love it/hate it camps which should be avoided at all cost. Ideally
a default theme should not be even noticed
Who wrote:
Cory, I mentioned ArtPackagingSchool on the wiki page about Theme
Teams - are you familiar with the launchpad theme packaging method in
a way that would mean you can contribute to that?
I notice Troy has added a very sensible comment on the wiki suggesting
we write a document not
julian wrote:
can you list these three attempts here for the benefit of review?
To the best of my ability:
1) Roughly about Warty there was a community effort. The original
Launchpad group was created from what I can recall.
2) Around Edgy there was a pretty decent push to get people to
Andrew Laignel wrote:
Ideally
a default theme should not be even noticed by the public - being neutral
and innofensive as possible should be the goal. A perfect demonstration
of this is Apple, where the current theme for OSX is crips, clean,
stylish and probably as neutral as you can get
Great :)
Now we just need some theme team leaders :P
On Jan 3, 2008 3:04 AM, Cory K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who wrote:
Cory, I mentioned ArtPackagingSchool on the wiki page about Theme
Teams - are you familiar with the launchpad theme packaging method in
a way that would mean you can
Who wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 3:04 AM, Cory K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who wrote:
Cory, I mentioned ArtPackagingSchool on the wiki page about Theme
Teams - are you familiar with the launchpad theme packaging method in
a way that would mean you can contribute to that?
I notice Troy has
As long as I can remember the Ubuntu Theme has been part of the
branding, something that helps make Ubuntu known, something for people
to talk about. From this point of view, it has worked very well - if
you see a screenshot of linux and it is brown, you _know_ it is ubuntu
- if you see a
Ooh, what's that one?
OSX is long held as one of the boldest and most unique designs in the
industry, when Windows was just toying with XP - Apple made the ultra-shiny,
over-glossed look and threw in every effect they could think of and paired
it with a pinstripe. If you look at OSX now, compared
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 02:31:17 + From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Moving things
forwards. On Jan 3, 2008 2:16 AM, Andrew Laignel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: I think votes are valuable. Not for seeing who likes a theme but
rather who
I can lead a team until mid this-month, get a team off to a good start. But
if anybody has bold and unique ideas, I'd be willing to work under them.
All and all, if people are willing to put up with a guy that has a tree up
his [censored for children] for two weeks, and they just need a design
I'm going to try to mimick Ken's mockups as close as I can with a true gtk
theme. If anyone here would like to help out with it email and we can take it
offline. I'll start using the pixmap engine for things I can't get any current
themes to make then attempt to alter some other engines to
Ken Vermette wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008 10:27 PM, Cory K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 3:04 AM, Cory K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who wrote:
Cory, I mentioned ArtPackagingSchool on the
On Jan 2, 2008 11:08 PM, Cory K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken Vermette wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008 10:27 PM, Cory K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 3:04 AM, Cory K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tackled Emerald, I'll be honest and say I suck when it comes to the
live conversion, so it could probably be done better. I'll post what I have
done tomorrow the moment I get at my regular development machine
(traveling). I'll also make a variation with an opaque content arera in case
Cimis'
35 matches
Mail list logo
