Re: Port defaults

2008-11-27 Thread David Ryder
Thank you, Hew, for the insight. I don't, and won't, use ufw as my router's protection has not failed me so far. I note your comments re Azureus/Vuze and ports; I have tried Deluge and it has no problem. I think I might switch. I tried Transmission some time ago and recently to confirm that I just

Re: Port defaults

2008-11-26 Thread Hew McLachlan
I think it's best that no firewall is applied by default. For example, a firewall on each computer of a home network would be an unnecessary complication, as a firewall at the router provides sufficient security for the whole network in most cases. I am not sure about your Azureus / Vuze problem,

Re: Port defaults

2008-11-26 Thread David Ryder
Thanks Hew, Wouldn't it be better if they reverted to being closed - if so, how can one do that apart from complicated rules for mail, firefox etc? The reason I asked originally was because whenever I close Azureus, when I next open it the port I was using is no longer available. Can I write a sc

Re: Port defaults

2008-11-26 Thread Hew McLachlan
Hi David, They are open by default. I have verified this with my use of programs such as Transmission that can test open ports. If you use ufw or some other firewall, ports will of course be closed with default rules (which I also verified). Regards, Hew McLachlan David Ryder wrote: > Hi, > Hard

Port defaults

2008-11-25 Thread David Ryder
Hi, Hardy I have seen conflicting posts on the Ubuntu forums. Could anybody please tell me if ports are closed by default or, as some state, are now open by default? Many thanks, David -- ubuntu-au mailing list ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au