Re: Team Appointment Process - Poll

2010-06-11 Thread karmic
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 02:42:23 +1000 Ubuntu Lists wrote: sorry for the bad form - replying to my own message > If I recall correctly, the number of members in 2010 quoted in the > notification that the AU-LoCo was not "re-endorsed" was something like > 14. The all time high was what? 64? I should

Fwd: Team Appointment Process - Poll

2010-06-10 Thread Andre Mangan
-- Forwarded message -- From: Andre Mangan Date: 11 June 2010 08:42 Subject: Re: Team Appointment Process - Poll To: David Fawcett On 11 June 2010 02:49, David Fawcett wrote: > I read this post a couple of times and it seems to me that you are > complaining that

Re: Team Appointment Process - Poll

2010-06-10 Thread David Fawcett
I read this post a couple of times and it seems to me that you are complaining that there aren't enough people actively involved in the process and then blaming the people who are bothered to get involved in the process for being lazy? You might want to rethink your position. On Thu, Jun 10, 2010

Re: Team Appointment Process - Poll

2010-06-10 Thread Ubuntu Lists
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 04:08:26 -0700 (PDT) bwright wrote: > How long do we want to hold up decisions. Are we just going to sit > here complaining about a voting system into the next year and have 0% > productivity isn't that the standard outcome of the democratic process? (little progress and lot

Re: Team Appointment Process - Poll

2010-06-10 Thread bwright
How long do we want to hold up decisions. Are we just going to sit here complaining about a voting system into the next year and have 0% productivity or are we going to do something. I have noticed the active participants are voting and the active members are the ones that get the choice. If you ar

Re: Team Appointment Process - Poll

2010-06-10 Thread Daniel Sobey
Hello Andrew, We had a long discussion in the meeting on how we should move forward and what we want. If you were not able to attend the meeting the logs are available at http://www.novarata.net/mootbot/ubuntu-au.log.20100608_0600.html There was a fair bit of discussion on how to move forward. We

Re: Team Appointment Process - Poll

2010-06-10 Thread Dale
On 10 June 2010 09:02, andrew wrote: > I have created a poll on the appointment process for team positions. > > http://www.doodle.com/pn7hyxe77wwr8bka > > > HOW TO VOTE CARD > > Meritocracy - Keep the current process. > > Democracy - Everybody has a say in who is appointed to the leadership > team

Re: Team Appointment Process - Poll

2010-06-10 Thread Dale
On 10 June 2010 09:02, andrew wrote: > I have created a poll on the appointment process for team positions. > > http://www.doodle.com/pn7hyxe77wwr8bka > > > HOW TO VOTE CARD > > Meritocracy - Keep the current process. > > Democracy - Everybody has a say in who is appointed to the leadership > team

Re: Team Appointment Process - Poll

2010-06-10 Thread Andre Mangan
All these polls, whether they are for governance structures or IRC meeting times are totally valueless unless the main body of Ubuntu users in Australia come out of their hiding places and declare their wishes. The current poll on governance registers the opinions of 18 Ubuntu users. Hardly a repr

Re: Team Appointment Process - Poll

2010-06-09 Thread Lisa Milne
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:32:29 +1000 andrew wrote: > I have created a poll on the appointment process for team positions. > > http://www.doodle.com/pn7hyxe77wwr8bka > > > HOW TO VOTE CARD > > Meritocracy - Keep the current process. > > Democracy - Everybody has a say in who is appointed to the

Team Appointment Process - Poll

2010-06-09 Thread andrew
I have created a poll on the appointment process for team positions. http://www.doodle.com/pn7hyxe77wwr8bka HOW TO VOTE CARD Meritocracy - Keep the current process. Democracy - Everybody has a say in who is appointed to the leadership team. Andrew G. -- ubuntu-au mailing list ubuntu-au@l