Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/5240
Task: ubuntu clamav
Assignee: MOTU => Ubuntu Backporters
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Martin Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> katapult is approved for backporting to breezy ;)
Done
--
James
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/29442
Changed in: Breezy Backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/29442
Comment:
Not in Dapper ;)
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Public bug reported:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/29442
Affects: breezy-backports (upstream)
Severity: Normal
Priority: (none set)
Status: Unconfirmed
Description:
sdfsd
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailma
no, I understood you the first time. I plan on locking the forum request areas by the end of this week and making the transition to LP support tickets.On 1/23/06,
Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/22/06, John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> That may very well happen in the future.
On 1/22/06, John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That may very well happen in the future. Due to technical limitations with
> the forums, it's difficult to just give a user moderator access to a single
> area without exposing all staff features.
I think you misunderstood me. I'm proposing to not
