[Bug 126951] Re: qt4 4.3.0-2 bug

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 126766 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126766 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 126766 latest qt 4.3 backports produces visual corruption during scrolling and in the systray -- qt4 4.3.0-2 bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126951 You

[Bug 126766] Re: latest qt 4.3 backports produces visual corruption during scrolling and in the systray

fix uploaded, waiting on freeze to finish ** Also affects: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- latest qt 4.3 backports produces visual corruption during scrolling and in the systray

[Bug 96586] Re: Backport Inkscape to 0.45.1-1ubuntu3 to feisty

It seems to me that backporting this now, without the SRU done is exactly what the Backports are for bug fixes policy was meant prevent. Backports is not a way to avoid doing SRUs. The SRU should be easy enough. If you need help with it, I'll help. In the meantime, I'm Won't Fixing this until

[Bug 111966] Re: Please backport git-core 1:1.5.1.3-1

Iguess any git 1.5.* version would be fine. But this bug seems abandoned. Should someone fill a new more generic bug? like just: backport git-core 1.5 -- Please backport git-core 1:1.5.1.3-1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111966 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 127034] please backport java-package (0.31) from Gutsy

Public bug reported: java-package in gutsy adds support for JDK 6u2 (and following updates). consider backport the package, thanks. Package builds cleanly in feisty pbuilder and installs okay. ** Affects: feisty-backports (upstream) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please

Re: [Bug 120485] Re: Backport request-tracker3.6 from feisty

It doesn't work in prevu script, the following error appear: dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/request-tracker3.6/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package `request-tracker3.6': `Depends' field, reference to `rt3.6-clients': error in version: version string is empty The control file is using

[Bug 120485] Re: Backport request-tracker3.6 from feisty

Right. That's a consistent problem with Dapper backports. Just to confirm, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/request- tracker3.6/3.6.1-3 worked fine? If so, it's better to backport from Feisty than to do a source backport which is what's required if you have to change the package. --

[Bug 45551] Re: kismet: UVF exception request for 2006-04-R1

Does someone have a debdiff for the source change? Is there still an interest in this? -- kismet: UVF exception request for 2006-04-R1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45551 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the bug contact for Dapper

[Bug 127014] Re: Please backport git-core 1.5.2.3-1 from Gutsy to Feisty

** Summary changed: - Please backport git-core 1.5 + Please backport git-core 1.5.2.3-1 from Gutsy to Feisty ** Description changed: Originally discussed in bug #111966 but in there I was adviced to create a new more general bug (the original got sort of abandoned). Reason for

Re: [Bug 120485] Re: Backport request-tracker3.6 from feisty

Yes, the request-tracker3.6-3.6.1-3 pakage backported from feisty works fine in our production environment. -- Marco Catunda 2007/7/19, Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Right. That's a consistent problem with Dapper backports. Just to confirm, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/request-

[Bug 120485] Re: Please backport request-tracker3.6 3.6.1-3 from Feisty to Dapper

** Summary changed: - Backport request-tracker3.6 from feisty + Please backport request-tracker3.6 3.6.1-3 from Feisty to Dapper ** Description changed: - I would like to see request-tracker3.6 backported from feisty to dapper + I would like to see request-tracker3.6 backported from feisty to