I am subscribed to this bug, and don't see any need to influence the
process. LTS does not imply backporting of major releases of major
components, it implies long term maintenance of the release.
By all means, you are welcome to contribute energy to the -backports
effort which is
unsubscribing ubuntu-archive as there is nothing for us to do here.
Thanks,
James
--
Please backport gnucash 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 from Karmic to Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383742
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant
Thanks, Mark, for chiming in.
Indeed LTS does not imply that every major piece of newly released
software will be backported, nor is the Backports team interested in
trying to do so if it means sacrificing the stability or supportability
of the OS...
To move this forward, in my mind:
(1) We
On 10/05/2009 10:37 AM, John Dong wrote:
Thanks, Mark, for chiming in.
Indeed LTS does not imply that every major piece of newly released
software will be backported, nor is the Backports team interested in
trying to do so if it means sacrificing the stability or supportability
of the OS...
Mozilla Team dailies are in a PPA because they are experimental in
nature; OpenOffice 3.1 has no reason to be unless the process of
backporting it requires some insane procedure that makes them unsuitable
for Backports' quality standards.
The red tape to get it into Backports is solely
Uploaded and accepted.
** Changed in: jaunty-backports
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
Please backport gnucash 2.2.9-0ubuntu1 from Karmic to Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383742
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the
Eseri does not have the ability to provide technical help, but can provide
modest funding, and would be glad to contribute US$1000 if it would help. We
encourage others to step forward as well. We don't need any paperwork, just a
paypal address or other delivery channel and will send this
2009/10/5 John Dong jd...@johndong.com:
(3) Furthermore, someone needs to step up to the plate in terms of
promising that the (somewhat frequent) security fixes to OpenOffice will
be backported too.
Isn't that what LTS means? That the stability and security of the
distro is assured for a
Yes, the version of OpenOffice shipped with Hardy LTS does have 3 year
guaranteed security updates.
I was saying that if a backport is done of a newer OpenOffice version,
we need to make sure someone is willing to provide the same guarantee.
--
Please backport OpenOffice.org 3 to Hardy
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
Milestone: intrepid-updates = None
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Chris Cheney (ccheney) = (unassigned)
--
Package OpenOffice.org 3.x for Backports
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267376
You received this bug notification because
10 matches
Mail list logo
