** Description changed:
- Python 2.7.8 contains many improvements to the ability of people using
+ Python 2.7.9 contains many improvements to the ability of people using
Python to write security applications, as documented in PEP 466
(https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0466/), including
** Changed in: mediathekview (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088658
Title:
mediathekview V 2.x is unusable /
ricotz bdrung, the stipped gdk lib would grow by ca. 90kb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933641
Title:
Enable broadway (HTML5) backend
To manage notifications
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007908
Title:
[backportpackage] doesn't work if package
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007042
Title:
[backportpackage] errors out on packages with
Wouldn't it be better to tweak dpkg-source to look for ubuntu, but not
for ~ubuntu?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007042
Title:
[backportpackage] fails but worked
Depending on what mirror you are using it could be a day or so.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960489
Title:
Please backport calibre 0.8.38+dfsg-1 from precise
This should be a candidate for backport.
** Package changed: calibre (Ubuntu) = oneiric-backports
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960489
Title:
Please backport
Confirmed bug in 0.9.15-4 and verified fix in 0.9.17-1~oneiric0.1
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
I downgraded the debhelper dependency to the lowest needed one (7.0.50~
for dh_override_* targets) and uploaded it as version 0.1.1. Please
backport that.
** Summary changed:
- Please backport packaging-dev 0.1
+ Please backport packaging-dev 0.1.1
** Description changed:
- Please backport
I can confirm that it works with flashplugin-installer from natty-
security.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802044
Title:
Please backport nspluginwrapper
Public bug reported:
Please backport nspluginwrapper 1.4.2-0ubuntu2 to natty. It compiles
[1], installs, and runs.
[1] https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive/backports
** Affects: natty-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: natty-backports
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 800224 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800224
Public bug reported:
Please backport packaging-dev 0.1 to maverick. It builds without
modification.
** Affects: maverick-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in:
Public bug reported:
Please backport packaging-dev 0.1 to natty, maverick, and lucid. It
builds without modification on natty and maverick and installs.
** Affects: lucid-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
** Affects: maverick-backports
Importance: Undecided
Here's the debdiff for lucid.
** Patch added: lucid.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/800224/+attachment/2177080/+files/lucid.patch
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Marking as confirmed as recommended in bug #786483.
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793709
Title:
Public bug reported:
Please backport indicator-multiload 0.1-0ubuntu1 to natty. It builds
without modification [1], installs and works.
[1] https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive/backports
** Affects: natty-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this
Some scripts were moved from ubuntu-dev-tools to devscripts. One option
would be to backport devscripts 2.11.0 and ubuntu-dev-tools 0.124. The
problem with the versioning is that there will be more SRUs (for e.g.
distro-info).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Public bug reported:
Please backport lintian 2.5.0ubuntu1 to natty. It builds without
modification [1], installs and works.
[1] https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive/backports
** Affects: natty-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
Please backport lintian 2.5.0~rc3ubuntu1 to natty. It builds without
modification [1] and works.
[1] https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive/backports
** Affects: natty-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
- Please backport
As previous mentioned, source changes are required. You have to use the
attached patch for backporting the package to lucid.
** Patch added: vlc_1.1.4-1ubuntu1~lucid1.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/607505/+attachment/1702156/+files/vlc_1.1.4-1ubuntu1%7Elucid1.debdiff
** Summary changed:
- [test-pkg-a] Please backport VLC 1.1.3
+ [test-pkg-a] Please backport VLC 1.1.4-1ubuntu1
--
[test-pkg-a] Please backport VLC 1.1.4-1ubuntu1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607505
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is
I am against the backport of ffmpeg v0.6. It will break the version of
audacity in lucid. The backport of FFmpeg can cause too many issues.
Instead vlc should be adjusted to build with the FFmpeg version of
lucid.
Attached a patch that will work on lucid. There is only one issue to
resolve: Check
uploaded
** Changed in: usbmount (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
[SRU] usbmount in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530972
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing
** Changed in: vlc (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
Please backport vlc to 0.9.8a in Intrepid (important security update)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307239
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy
uploaded
** Changed in: keepalived (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: Triaged = Fix Committed
--
[SRU] keepalived in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530945
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-backports
Unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors; you can upload the patch by yourself.
--
[SRU] usbmount in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530972
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
I see two separate issues raised here.
1 - The fact that ubuntu promised to maintain some old-version of major apps
longer than upstream authors. (Alan post #8)
2 - The fact that - unless related to security - applications will almost never
get patched/corrected/updated
I don't think 1. is a
Public bug reported:
Please backport lintian 2.3.1ubuntu1
It builds on karmic without changes. I used it heavily without problems.
I have uploaded an unchanged version to my backports PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive/backports
** Affects: karmic-backports
Importance: Undecided
** Changed in: libcm (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu Sponsors for universe (ubuntu-universe-sponsors) =
(unassigned)
--
version too old
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54287
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is a direct subscriber.
--
I don't see how anyone is tricked
The user _feels_ tricked, because no common users would imagine that a long
time supported operating system built by a worldwide team of expert
developers which is is an open-source alternative to Windows and Office.
would means that the _applications_ who runs
Hi,
As i was confronted again today to the need to install Office 3 to some users
(who could do it easily on MSWin, but not on Ubuntu), i wondered if there was a
place where the previously-available build could be retrieved ?
Reinstalling a whole OS or manually fixing the common upgrade problem
I think Bill's comment was kindly trying to work-around the silly
Please contribute-style answer - as it is obvious that Normal end-
users can not tweak inside the technical of an operating system, simply
to have an Office suite installed on their Long Time Supported Desktop
OS.
--
Please
Public bug reported:
Hi !
The Ubuntu Download page says :
Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Desktop: Released April 2008 and maintained until
April 2011 – ideal for large deployments
Yet, it happens that LTS is only maintained for some very technical definition
of maintained. As a very obvious example, it is
Pushing the problem forward, i have opened a separate bugreport to what is,
IMHO, the core issue which tricked many users and lead to unfortunate
deployment :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hardy-backports/+bug/445460
That way, this bugreport can concentrate back on the backport technical topic.
--
** Changed in: hardy-backports
Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Website Editors (ubuntu-website)
--
LTS Download Page has misleading content
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445460
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 267376
Package OpenOffice.org 3.x for Backports
--
Please backport OpenOffice.org 3 to Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283137
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to
Hi,
You're right that the other bugreport is about minor (non-LTS) distro, That's
why i de-deplicated it.
Also that this bugreport has already been set to High (i would have set it to
critical if it were up to me...)
--
Please backport OpenOffice.org 3 to Hardy
Hi again,
I could only second the above posts.
How could the fact that the current (LTS, aka non-geek) version of a
general-user oriented distribution is unable to run office software be
anything else than a *showstopper* bug ?
I personnally wouldn't point to the backport-team on that, since
** Summary changed:
- Backport adblock-plus 1.0.1-0ubuntu1 to intrepid
+ Please backport adblock-plus 1.1-0ubuntu1
** Description changed:
Recommended filter subscription for adblock-plus requires adblock-plus
- 1.0.1 to function properly, as seen in screenshot attached. I think it's
- a good
Hi,
Thanks for your hard work.
Not that i want to insist, but what exactly is the status about that ?
Currently there are some good-working Office 3.1 packages for LTS on the PPA.
But, according to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org , Hardy
users are still expected to use an
Hi,
Just upgraded from the ppa today, currently running 1:3.1.0-3ubuntu2~hardy1.
Seems to work correctly, at first sight, including, for example, loading a
presentation with an .avi mpeg (nosound) video in it. Spell-check works
correctly in the correct language. Gnome open dialog works
Hi,
Thanks for your quick answer !
Are you seriously suggesting that customers using Ubuntu (LTS) on their
desktop will not be able to use OpenOffice.org 3 ? And that This is a
really bad idea that Ubuntu customer can't run Office 3 ? What do you
suggest people/companies using Hardy LTS (e.g. on
Hi !
What is the status of backporting Office 3 to Hardy LTS ?
It's already months since it was released, and yet, people using the
current (LTS) Ubuntu Desktop still can't run it while the Microsoft
customers could run it month agos.
Hell, OpenOffice.org is the very software used as an example
You do not need to backport automake1.10. You only have to add automake
to build dependencies. Have a look at my PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive
--
Please backport audacity 1.3.6-2 from Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301429
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: hardy-backports
Status: New = Confirmed
--
please backport python-numpy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243203
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing
Hi,
I second this request. Numpy 1.1 is back-compatible with 1.0.4, and the
Intrepid packages build out-of-the-box on hardy. (Tested with prevu). Already
some scientific packages requires 1.1 (such as the improved matplotlib 0.98).
Thanks !
--
please backport python-numpy
47 matches
Mail list logo
