@lopeonline:
Hi, I think this seems possible for Ubuntu backports.
Can you follow the process here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports and do
the initial testing to ensure this backport works for others.
Thanks!
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You recei
Sponsored for Precise.
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Invalid
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Luis Henriques (henrix) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Importance: High => Critical
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Crit
Hi,
I've been trying to sponsor this for Precise, but I notice that the debdiff
also contains changes to 'debian/patches/debian-changes'. What I'd expect is
just to add Luis' patch without those additional changes; however I think this
is some underlying packaging problem. If I just 'quilt impor
The verification of the Stable Release Update for sosreport has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter
Hello Louis, or anyone else affected,
Accepted sosreport into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/3.1-1ubuntu2.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
Sponsored for Saucy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1296755
Title:
sosreport archive /var/lib/maas by default
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://
I think the overall goal is to get something into precise-backports; so
hopefully that path is still available.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1296755
Title:
sosrepo
Let's ensure sosreport Trusty/Saucy has a critical mass of bugs fixed first,
then we can worry about the backport process to Q then P. Spoke with Louis
about this. Unsubscribing sponsors for now until this is sorted.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
** Changed in: oneiric-backports
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: precise-backports
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943502
Ti
Installation issues on quantal.
$ sudo dpkg -i apt-cacher-ng_0.7.11-1~quantal1~ppa1_amd64.deb
Selecting previously unselected package apt-cacher-ng.
dpkg: regarding apt-cacher-ng_0.7.11-1~quantal1~ppa1_amd64.deb containing
apt-cacher-ng:
apt-cacher-ng conflicts with logrotate (<< 3.8.0)
logro
Both packages have built successfully here:
https://launchpad.net/~arges/+archive/backports
** Description changed:
Please backport apt-cacher-ng 0.7.11-1 (universe) from raring to
precise, quantal.
Reason for the backport:
There have been numerous bug fixes,
Public bug reported:
Please backport apt-cacher-ng 0.7.11-1 (universe) from raring to
precise, quantal.
Reason for the backport:
There have been numerous bug fixes, stability fixes, and features added to
newer releases of apt-cacher-ng that would be useful to those using
I have just verified this works and passes all the test cases.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943
At this point, I've already requested a backport in October, so I can copy and
paste that again.
However, I spoke with infinity about this bug yesterday and he recommended an
SRU, which is why I created that patch.
While I said the patch 'enables' these features, it really fixes the legitimate
A
ed.
Problem Description:
whois in oneiric can't query .hr/.sx/.pe TLDs. In addition the query format
for ARIN is different than in precise.
Version affected:
Current Oneiric Version: 5.0.11ubuntu2
** Changed in: whois (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Chris
Ok backports cleanly to Precise as well. Did the tests, attached the
requestbackport output to the description. Thanks
** Description changed:
+ Summary (one line):
+ Please backport whois 5.0.19 (main) from quantal
+
+ Description:
+ Please backport whois 5.0.19 (main) from quantal to precise.
FWIW: Build is here: https://launchpad.net/~christopherarges/+archive
/ppa-test/+sourcepub/2698908/+listing-archive-extra
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943502
Title:
w
** Description changed:
Please backport whois 5.0.19 (main) from quantal
Description:
Please backport whois 5.0.19 (main) from quantal to oneiric.
Reason for the backport:
This provides some needed updates to users who need to query .hr/.sx/.pe
TLDs, and
** Description changed:
Please backport whois 5.0.19 (main) from quantal
Description:
Please backport whois 5.0.19 (main) from quantal to oneiric.
Reason for the backport:
This provides some needed updates to users who need to query .hr/.sx/.pe
TLDs, and
This now cleanly backports to oneiric from quantal.
Using:
backportpackage -s quantal -d oneiric -B pbuilder-dist -b whois -w .
** Description changed:
- Please backport whois 5.0.17 (main) from quantal
+ Please backport whois 5.0.19 (main) from quantal
Description:
- Please backport whois
Sent a new patch to debian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943502
Title:
whois doesn't properly query .hr/.sx/.pe TLDs and incorrect format for
whois.arin.net
To man
** Also affects: whois via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684526
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943502
So we can't backport because of the version string check in
debian/rules. I proposed just removing it entirely in debian here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684526
If this gets fixed, then backporting will be possible.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #684526
http://bu
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035365
Title:
Please backport libhugetlbfs 2.11-0ubuntu1 (universe) from natty
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
I notice this is still in the upload queue, any way I can help to get this
uploaded?
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+queue
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035365
Ti
I have built this in my PPA here:
https://launchpad.net/~christopherarges/+archive/ppa-test/+sourcepub/2603752/+listing-archive-extra
** Description changed:
Please backport libhugetlbfs 2.11-0ubuntu1 (universe) from natty to
lucid.
Reason for the backport:
T
installs cleanly and runs
[ ] hugepages installs cleanly and runs
[ ] libhugetlbfs-tests installs cleanly and runs
No reverse dependencies
** Affects: lucid-backports
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Chris J Arges (christopherarges)
Status: New
** Changed in: lucid-backports
** Description changed:
-
- Please backport whois 5.0.15ubuntu2 (main) from precise
+ Please backport whois 5.0.17 (main) from quantal
Description:
- Please backport whois 5.0.15ubuntu2 (main) from precise to oneiric.
+ Please backport whois 5.0.17 (main) from quantal to oneiric.
Reason
No change backport. This is slightly different than what backportpackage
came up with because I did need to change the version string from
5.0.17~oneiric1 to 5.0.17ubuntu1~oneiric1. This works now because the
maintainer added the simple patch to correctly detect version backport
strings.
** Patch
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968612
Title:
Please backport openldap 2.4.25-1.1ubuntu4.1 (main) fro
Send a bug to Debian requesting this change:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671097
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #671097
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671097
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, whi
This patch backports the precise whois version to oneiric. There are no
changes, except changing the config.h VERSION constant to match the
changelog version.
** Patch added: "whois-5.0.15ubuntu2~oneiric1.1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whois/+bug/943502/+attachment/309606
different than in precise.
Version affected:
Current Oneiric Version: 5.0.11ubuntu2
** Changed in: whois (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Chris J Arges (christopherarges)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subsc
Ignore #4. Will be sure to test install before posting. I need to remove
multiarch-support as a dependency.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968612
Title:
Please backpor
I have a patch that backports oneric openldap to lucid.
In addition I have built it and published to my PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~christopherarges/+archive/ppa-
test/+sourcepub/2383140/+listing-archive-extra
Will do the testing and start checking off items in the desc.
** Patch added: "openlda
Working on this backport now. Have had to re-try many times and this
build takes a while. Will update when I get a proper build.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968612
Ti
I'd like to request a backport from natty to lucid for openldap.
I've tried to build a no-change backport, but some changes are required.
Attached is the debdiff needed to be applied to the original backport in order
to allow it to build.
So one can use backportpackage, then apply this to the resu
** Description changed:
Please backport openldap 2.4.23-6ubuntu6.1 (main) from natty-updates to
lucid.
Reason for the backport:
The version of openldap in natty has autogroup overlay functionality and
numerous fixes that would be valuable to users of lucid LT
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968612
Title:
Please backport openldap 2.4.23-6ubuntu6.1 (main) from natt
Public bug reported:
Please backport openldap 2.4.23-6ubuntu6.1 (main) from natty-updates to
lucid.
Reason for the backport:
The version of openldap in natty has autogroup overlay functionality and
numerous fixes that would be valuable to users of lucid LTS.
Testing:
==
@james
I'd like to go through the backport process.
** Changed in: whois (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943502
Tit
41 matches
Mail list logo
