Re: REQ: BitTornado 0.3.15

this is a main package and has nothing to do with MOTU apparently. i don't know why you sent me to them and neither do they. You download the source put it in the /opt package I believe then you just type in the console python /opt/yourpackage.py It should work. Also Ubuntu MOTU is Masters of

Re: galeon 2.0.0

no, Sun Java uses a different file... that's Blackdown that's being disabled, hence the then using Sun Java part. Yeah thats how I got it to work. Doing it this way lots of googling and all pointing to the fact of using the Sun's version of Java instead of Blackdown. I just did the jpkg of

tomboy 0.3.3

Request from forums. Builds fine, installs fine, runs fine. Pretty cool software. Regards, Marc -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

Re: setting up a backports environment

On 11/30/05, John Dong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: google ubp-build.py I run ubp-build.py inside a chroot, which is cleaned fairly frequently. As long as you don't do stupid things to the chroot, it'll stay fairly clean... How about using PBuilder? it guarantees a clean chroot, and is

galeon 2.0.0

Build's, installs and runs fine. Regrds, Marc -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

Re: galeon 2.0.0

, making sure they work at least as well in 2.0 as in 1.3. On 11/30/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Build's, installs and runs fine. Regrds, Marc -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

metacity 2.13-3

There was a request in the forums for this. It backported fine. Compiled fine can't test it at the moment due to me not using it. :) Regards, Marc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com

gphpedit 0.9.8

This compiles fine and semi-tested seems to work fine :) Regards Marc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

libvisual and libvisual-dev

Both of these packages are originally not in breezy. I have tested a backport of them and they seem to compile fine. However they are libs. The same person has requested libsdl which I would think would not be backported. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=96548 Regards, Marc

amarok 1.3.6

I've tested this and my results are as follows. This is what I get for amarok [quote] : Build-Depends dependency for amarok cannot be satisfied because no available versions of package kdelibs4-dev can satisfy version requirements I couldn't resolve build dependencies by myself. I'll drop you to a

kaffeine 0.7.1

Hey all These are all my build errors with this. Setting up libqt3-compat-headers (3.3.4-8ubuntu5) ... ***Building... dpkg-buildpackage: source package is kaffeine dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.7.1-1.2ubuntu1~breezy0.1 dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Jonathan Riddell [EMAIL

gnochm 0.9.6

It builds fine. You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: gnochm: Depends: gconf2 (= 2.6.2-1) but it is not installed Depends: python-gtk2 (= 2.2.0) but it is not installed Depends: python-glade2 (= 2.2.0)

baobab 2.2.0

It build, installs and runs fine. Regards, Marc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

Re: kaffeine 0.7.1

I have done and it built fine. The only problem I had was when running it, it generated an error intialised gstreamer but that I think was running it from a chroot. Regards, Marc On 11/29/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all These are all my build errors

Re: gnochm 0.9.6

On 11/29/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It builds fine. You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: gnochm: Depends: gconf2 (= 2.6.2-1) but it is not installed Depends: python-gtk2 (= 2.2.0

Re: kaffeine 0.7.1

It was the chroot. I installed at work on a not chrooted environment. If run from console it generates a lot of console output but works fine. I tried it on an mpg and avi I have and it works fine. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com

x-moto 0.1.8

Hey All, It wasn't in breezy a request on the forums for it. Compiles fine, installs and runs. I can't ride motorbikes to save my life :( Regards, Marc -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

gthumb (2.6.8-0ubuntu2~breezy0.1)

Compiles fine, installs fine and runs fine. 2.6.7 is the version in breezy. Regards, Marc -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

amsn

Theres a new version of amsn in dapper I'm not sure whether people use it a lot or not however it fixes a bug and it is backportable. Regards, Marc -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

gaim-1.5.0+1.5.1cvs20051015

Same with this haven't had any requests thus far and it may be my own personal backport but it works fine. Out of this and amsn I use this one more. Regards, Marc -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

Inkscape 0.43

In dapper now and it compiles, builds and installs fine. I had a bit of play with it I've never used it before it looks nice. Regards, Marc -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

Re: KmyMoney-0.8.1

Wierd it built when using pbuilder. I'm trying it again maybe my drugs have kicked in? Regards, Marc Upstream debian seems to have a similar issue.

Re: grip

On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 21:36 -0500, John Dong wrote: grip approved for breezy-backports. I compiled it earlier today and was going to upload it however I don't know where to upload it to? Apart from that it compiled fine. Can you tell me where to upload it to? Regards, Marc signature.asc

Re: question

wrote: Hello. Marc Wiriadisastra: Also on another point trac-0.9 has been requested it builds fine. However installation. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/trac$ sudo dpkg -i *deb Selecting previously deselected package trac. (Reading database ... 128847 files and directories currently

Re: grip

On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 10:20 -0500, John Dong wrote: On 11/25/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I compiled it earlier today and was going to upload it however I don't know where to upload it to? Apart from that it compiled fine

Re: grip

On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 11:37 -0500, John Dong wrote: On 11/25/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I understand that but at the end of the ubp-build.py script there are options to upload it to backports or extras then there is another option

question

I have a couple of questions. that ubp-build.py I remember someone saying it was updated however I can't find that link can someone point it to me. Also on another point trac-0.9 has been requested it builds fine. However installation. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/trac$ sudo dpkg -i *deb