Public bug reported:
This is causing recurrent complaints from Ubuntu users not having the
latest and greatest Drush release in their stable ubuntu.
See this thread for an example: https://drupal.org/node/1152908
This is a continuation of #755169. I wonder, as a Debian Developer, how
I can help
Ping! What's keeping this from being backported now?
4.5 is coming up next week, I hope this will not be an issue...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755169
Title:
Back
i have finally found time to test the backport in lucid, and I confirm
it works. unfortunately, I can't test in maverick, but I don't see why
it would fail there.
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I have opened a bug report to remove the leaf package from the archive:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-sponsoring/+bug/793567
I will test the backport in a few minutes...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backpor
Can we get an update here and backport this to lucid/maverick please?
** Also affects: irssi-xmpp
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: maverick-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I agree this should be backported to maverick.
I have the test environment only for Lucid however, so I will do that
part.
I am the maintainer of aegir-provision in Debian, and it was removed
from unstable and squeeze, because that version is out of date, unstable
and unsupported upstream. It sho
I have reviewed the requirements and I do not believe the drush backport
will cause any problem to other packages, being a leaf package (for
now). Drush 4.4 is also much more featureful and has bugfixes that are
not present in the 3.3 package, which maybe could warrant a SRU instead,
but those are
Public bug reported:
The version in maverick is *much* more stable than 0.50 and allows the
user to not specify the password in the config file. I request that 0.51
be backported to lucid. I have build a backport on my own in lucid and
it works fine. I can publish it somewhere if necessary, but ju
