** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Lucid Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587064
Title:
Please backport efax-gtk 3.2.2-1
To manage notifica
I've opened a backport request, because I've thought it was a simple way
to test if 3.2.2-1 is working well for Lucid users and because I've
take a look at the changelog between 3.2.2-1 and 3.0.17-1 and I've see
that there are lot of changes (so I think a SRU is a bit complicated);
bug #536639 wa
As far for me, I have suscribed to this bug #587064 because it addressed
my current problem with efax-gtk. I assumed that Alessio asked for a
backport because he thought that it was not possible to correct the
issue with a stable release update. So, if it's possible as you suggest,
of course it wou
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Please backport efax-gtk 3.2.2-1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
Good information - but if it is a bugfix, a Stable Release update will
help a wider range of users while backports only help those who have
backports enabled.
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: Incomplete => New
--
Please backport efax-gtk 3.2.2-1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58706
Hello Steve,
Thank you for your attention.
It's a feature request to follow a new feature of ghostscript. Without a new
feature for efax, efax is broken due to the new feature of ghostscript...
More information here :
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.printing.ghostscript.cvs/9046
efax-gtk 3.2
I just updated the release in Maverick so that we could consider it (we
don't do backports from a higher Debian version)
I have a few questions however:
1) were any changes needed to the source to have it build in lucid?
2) Is this a bugfix or feature request?
Please advise.
Steve
** Changed in
