** Changed in: debian
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to raring-backports.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu Backporters
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
Title:
[needs-packaging]
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Triaged => Invalid
** Changed in: raring-backports
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Feisty Backports.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu Backporters
Yeah, probably safe to close. As janc correctly states, Celtx turned
into a SaaS a couple of years ago, and the previous open source app is
no longer developed. It was also based on XUL which is also no longer a
thing.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Bernhard Reiter (ockham-razor) =>
** No longer affects: ubuntustudio
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Feisty Backports.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu Backporters
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
Title:
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video
Went ahead and closed in Ubuntu Studio.
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Importance: Wishlist => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to raring-backports.
Looks to me like Celtx has become an online service at celtx.com that is
no longer open source?
If nobody corrects me on that, you can probably just close this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to raring-backports.
Is this even still a thing? Last comment on this bug was over 7 years
ago.
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to raring-backports.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu
** Also affects: raring-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Feisty Backports.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu Backporters
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
Title:
I've just packaged version 2.9.1 for natty and uploaded it to my PPA,
https://launchpad.net/~ockham-razor/+archive/ppa/
Please test! You might notice that it's not based on the previous effort found
in this bug report; I wanted to use current packaging techniques like debhelper
7 and source
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Assignee: Alessio Treglia (quadrispro) = (unassigned)
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Status: In Progress = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.
** Also affects: baltix
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed
I'm using celtx_2.7+dfsg1-0inniyah1_amd64.deb from
http://alioth.debian.org/~miriam/celtx/ on maverick. It works, but I get
a
LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library
/home/bernie/.mozilla/plugins/gxineplugin.so
[/home/bernie/.mozilla/plugins/gxineplugin.so: wrong ELF class:
ELFCLASS32]
I've also noticed that I don't get any menu entry, and there is no
celtx.desktop in /usr/share/applications. Perhaps the menu file is
broken?
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification
Does this work on Jaunty ? Thanks
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports.
--
I have prepared celtx 2.5.1 packages for Debian, temporarily available
at http://alioth.debian.org/~miriam/celtx/
I still have to finish them properly, though, but I guess they are in
quite good condition to be usable, in case someone wants to adapt them
to Ubuntu.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx -
** Changed in: gutsy-backports
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
** Changed in: feisty-backports
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because
I've not had time to fix the items in the review, and I kinda doubt that
I'll get it done tonight. It's probably too late, anyway. I promise I'll
have it done for Lucid, though, and I'll certainly have a PPA for
Karmic.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
It's uploaded to REVU. There are a few warnings it generated. I'm going
to try to address these tonight.
http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/celtx
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification
OK, folks. Celtx 2.0.1 has been built for both Jaunty and Karmic in the
associated PPA. Please install it and check it out. I want to propose it
for Karmic as early as Monday night if it's running fine.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
I tested your build on a 32Bit Jaunty and it is working great so far.
Thanks,
2009/8/24 Colin Dean c...@cad.cx
OK, folks. Celtx 2.0.1 has been built for both Jaunty and Karmic in the
associated PPA. Please install it and check it out. I want to propose it
for Karmic as early as Monday night
Edit: 32bit Karmic has issues with splash screen, boxes aren't drawn
right.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Thom Hastings
tghasti...@gmail.comwrote:
Ditto for 64bit Jaunty + 32bit Karmic
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:13 PM, George Wright ex...@agendi.com wrote:
I tested your build on a
Aaaand again, it may just be my resolution, but many boxes seem to be drawn
too large.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Thom Hastings
tghasti...@gmail.comwrote:
Edit: 32bit Karmic has issues with splash screen, boxes aren't drawn right.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Thom Hastings
Ditto for 64bit Jaunty + 32bit Karmic
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:13 PM, George Wright ex...@agendi.com
wrote:
I tested your build on a 32Bit Jaunty and it is working great so far.
Thanks,
2009/8/24 Colin Dean c...@cad.cx
OK, folks. Celtx 2.0.1 has been built for both Jaunty and Karmic in
I saw those when I tried it out, but I chalked it up to oddities with
the theme I was using.
Is the scrollbar present when you open one of the test documents? I
notice that it's missing.
I guess I'll take a look at the differences in the dependencies and see
if there the Jaunty version of gtk+
I can confirm that on 32bit Karmic boxes aren't drawn right. It got a
little better when I turned compiz off, but not by much. However, I
don't honestly believe this minor bug should prevent the package from
entering Karmic. Get the package uploaded to REVU as soon as possible
(feature freeze
I had a successful build just now during lunch. However, I seem to have
accidentally deleted the .orig.tar.gz file, so I'm gonna redo some of it
and and see what else I can refine. Ideally, it'll be in my PPA before
midnight.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production
I'm almost there. I've got celtx building and I'm just having some
stupid errors like typos in my rules file and such. I'll have the
package up by the end of the weekend, or tonight if it succeeds in the
next hour or so.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production
On 08/12/2009 11:31 PM, Colin Dean wrote:
Here's my first attempt at making a package from source. The newest
version of the source available is 2.0.1. I've put in request that the
source for 2.0.2 be released (they're more than a month late posting
it).
This is a BINARY package compiled
Thom, thanks.
John, that's pretty much the plan. I need to take a look at the Firefox
source package and see how it is configured. Celtx and it use the same
build process with one extra configure included from the celtx
directory.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media
Whoops, forgot to attach it.
** Attachment added: celtx 2.0.1 amd64, compiled against ubuntu jaunty
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30261477/celtx-2.0.1_amd64.deb
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received
Downloading it now, will test on Ubuntu!
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Colin Dean c...@cad.cx wrote:
I've completed an initial attempt at the package.
Please note that this version of the package was NOT compiled on Ubuntu!
It's the stock English package from Celtx's web site with
Installed .deb worked perfectly Ubuntu 9.04 amd64 worked perfectly!
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Thom Hastings tghasti...@gmail.com
wrote:
Downloading it now, will test on Ubuntu!
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Colin Dean c...@cad.cx wrote:
I've completed an initial attempt at the
Colin,
Thank you for your effort. However, we upload Debian source packages in
Ubuntu, and not the final installable Debian package as you have
attached to the bug report (which isn't even compiled and linked against
Ubuntu libraries).
For help with packaging, please have a look at the packaging
Thanks for trying out, Thom. Now that I know that the little build
system I set up works (I couldn't get dh_make to work acceptably with
their package), I can proceed trying to build the source package I
planned on building.
Chris, thanks for a reminder of the policy. I am aware of the need for a
I've completed an initial attempt at the package.
Please note that this version of the package was NOT compiled on Ubuntu!
It's the stock English package from Celtx's web site with sufficient
structure and files to make a Debian package.
I may try to recompile it myself at a later date, but
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to
Colin, you mentioned that you'd certainly have this package done for
Karmic, and Karmic's feature freeze is on it's way around the bend.
What's the status of your packaging effort? Need a hand?
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicReleaseSchedule, Feature
Freeze is 27 August.
I'll make every effort to get the package made this week.
IIRC, when I first tried, I couldn't get it to compile (it's been ~two
years since I tried before running into life). I may end up packaging
the
Celtx 2.0 is out!
http://celtx.com/
It would be great to have in ubuntustudio!
** Also affects: ubuntustudio
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug
I agree, this is long overdue.
-Original Message-
Date: Monday, March 02, 2009 10:55:31 am
To: tghasti...@gmail.com
From: sputnik sputniksh...@gmail.com
Subject: [Bug 99965] Re: [needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media
pre-production suite
Celtx 2.0 is out!
http://celtx.com
I'm back to using Celtx regularly, so I'm going to spend some time at some
point trying to get this packaged. I don't know if I'll finish it before
the Jaunty package freeze, but it will certainly be done before Karmic.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production
Don't expect it to get packaged anytime soon. The package freeze is
already in, and the application uses their own home-made license:
http://www.celtx.com/CePL/
Which would require speaking with the FSF or something to figure out the
exact implication.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:04:44 -, Vadim Peretokin vpereto...@gmail.com
wrote:
Don't expect it to get packaged anytime soon. The package freeze is
already in, and the application uses their own home-made license:
http://www.celtx.com/CePL/
Which would require speaking with the FSF or
For inclusion in Debian, it would need to be re-trademarked. However,
even without re-trademarking it should be suitable for inclusion in
Universe. Barring that, there should be no question that it's acceptable
in Multiverse. We've definitely got a place for Celtx if you package it!
--
*If* it were to hit Multiverse, it would not be included *in* Ubuntu
Studio but we could promote it.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports
Would love to see this program included in the repos. Let's get this
things moving!
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team,
** Changed in: feisty-backports
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: gutsy-backports
Status: New = Incomplete
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
You received this bug notification because you are a
47 matches
Mail list logo
