On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 05:35:21PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Today we had a Backporters meeting, and indeed we don't have any
> opposition to this latest proposal, thank you for the prods, and I'm
> happy that this topic is finally coming to a close!
Thanks!
> Please do email us a bit more
So, hello TB!
Today we had a Backporters meeting, and indeed we don't have any
opposition to this latest proposal, thank you for the prods, and I'm
happy that this topic is finally coming to a close!
Please do email us a bit more "formally" once it's done, so that we have
a good authoritative
Hi backporters team,
The TB has still not received any response on the proposal to adopt
Mattia's suggested Charter. As such, in today's TB meeting it was agreed
that the TB would ratify this as the Charter for the Backporters team
after Monday 12th June. Please let us know if you have objections
Hey backporters team,
Just wanted to see if anyone had any thoughts on this? The TB are keen
to move this forward and are just waiting on some kind of ACK from your
side.
Thanks,
Alex
On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 14:59:22 +0930, Alex Murray wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> After the most recent Tech Board
Hi folks,
After the most recent Tech Board meeting, the TB agreed that the best
way forward here would be to go with Mattia's proposal outlined below (I
have reproduced it here):
* Maintain the Ubuntu "backports" pocket.
* Establish and manage an effective process and a set of policies to
On Wed, 2023-03-01 at 21:33:09 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Hello Robie!
>
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 05:21:10PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
>> I wonder if it's worth first discussing what the text would actually be
>> used *for*, since your reply suggests to me that we might not have the
>> same
Hello Robie!
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 05:21:10PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> I wonder if it's worth first discussing what the text would actually be
> used *for*, since your reply suggests to me that we might not have the
> same view on this here.
This seems to be the case indeed.
> I see the
Hi!
Thank you for your time on this.
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 04:22:13PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > So I think we are starting to get to the crux of the difference in
> > > viewpoints from the TB to the backporters team. Due to the past history
> > > of some perceived dysfunction within
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 11:03:02AM +1030, Alex Murray wrote:
> Just wondering if you had a chance to review my feedback? It would be
> great to try and make some progress here.
We have a meeting later today, but I'll give you my own inputs.
The tl;dr: I'm more in-line with Dan comments.
> >>>
Hi Backporters team,
Just wondering if you had a chance to review my feedback? It would be
great to try and make some progress here.
Thanks,
Alex
On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 11:17:46 +1030, Alex Murray wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 09:47:37 -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at
On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 09:47:37 -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:21 AM Alex Murray
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ubuntu Backporters Team,
>>
>> The Tech Board is hoping to progress the ratification of a charter for
>> the Ubuntu Backporters Team as discussed previously on a number of
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:21 AM Alex Murray wrote:
>
> Hi Ubuntu Backporters Team,
>
> The Tech Board is hoping to progress the ratification of a charter for
> the Ubuntu Backporters Team as discussed previously on a number of
> occasions. My understanding is that these previous discussions
Hi Ubuntu Backporters Team,
The Tech Board is hoping to progress the ratification of a charter for
the Ubuntu Backporters Team as discussed previously on a number of
occasions. My understanding is that these previous discussions between
the Backporters Team and the Tech Board have not been able
13 matches
Mail list logo
