On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 3:10 PM Thomas Ward wrote:
>
> The only thing in Lunar's backports are the `cockpit` package, I forget
> did we give that an exception?
well that's what I meant, should we continue with the 'exception only'
policy for backports to non-LTS releases? Or should we allow optio
Same with Mantic.
On 10/30/23 15:09, Thomas Ward wrote:
The only thing in Lunar's backports are the `cockpit` package, I
forget did we give that an exception?
Thomas
On 10/30/23 10:58, Thomas Ward wrote:
I'll take a look at Lunar (didn't that just release though...?) as I
have a server rel
The only thing in Lunar's backports are the `cockpit` package, I forget
did we give that an exception?
Thomas
On 10/30/23 10:58, Thomas Ward wrote:
I'll take a look at Lunar (didn't that just release though...?) as I have a
server related task for that to work on.
Thomas
-Original M
I'll take a look at Lunar (didn't that just release though...?) as I have a
server related task for that to work on.
Thomas
-Original Message-
From: ubuntu-backports On Behalf Of
Dan Streetman
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 10:55 AM
To: Backports Discussion
Subject: allowing backpor
