*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 42178 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42178
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 42178
synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 42178
synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576820
Title:
Synaptic ignores pins in
This was marked as a duplicate of bug #42178, but that is wrong.
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 42178
synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 628818 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628818
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 628818
Synaptic doesn't honor pinning rules in /etc/apt/preferences.d/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
synaptic (0.75) unstable; urgency=low
* common/rpackagecache.cc:
- read pindir as well as the pinfile (LP: #628818)
** Project changed: synaptic = synaptic (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 628818 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628818
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 628818
Synaptic doesn't honor pinning rules in /etc/apt/preferences.d/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Version: 0.80.2
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341451
Title:
Synaptic terminal window does not use system monospace
** Package changed: synaptic (Ubuntu) = dictionaries-common (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881192
Title:
libre and open office conflict over dictionary-common
To manage
mboxcheck-applet is no longer provided. I dont see that a package named
mbox ever was (in recent history).
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This is normal a transient problem that goes away after a short while.
You will have to refresh your software index (or ‘sudo apt-get update’)
and try again.
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
If you still have this problem please consult
http://www.ubuntu.com/support.
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066259
Nothing to do with synaptic, and I dont see any package providing a
program named “afni”. You should refile this under whatever package
that is.
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Summary changed:
- Synaptic doesn't respect gnome preferences
+ Synaptic doesn't respect gnome menu and toolbar preferences
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19053
Title:
SimonP (peeters-simon) wrote:
the problem is here that synaptic automatically installs
ALL (also the dependencies of a selected package) packages
as being manually installed
If that was ever true, it certainly is no longer the case.
BeowulfOF (beowulfof) wrote:
But the whole system is not
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 512481 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512481
The problem is that in the past installing a new system left all many of
the base packages marked manually installed. This number has been
greatly reduced recently (see my comments in bug #512481), but it is
Seems to work on 0.80.2.
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615838
Title:
[maverick] Synaptic no longer ever shows the
Just after installing Ubuntu 10.4.1 (testing version of 10.10 that I've
downloaded yesterday morning: 2010, Oct the 9th).
I'm having abnormal issues when starting Synaptic like:
- critical error at startup: dkpg was interrupted, you must run manually...
- broken packages
Yes, well its a
You will have to elaborate on this.
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711535
Title:
Breaks: libc6
Hello i use some proxy setting in firefox and network proxy setting
from administrator menu,
then i change my location and i use internet with out proxy, any why after i
removie the proxy setting the APT is give me this error
Something wicked happened
resolving 'slc-isa:8080' (-5 - No
after removing my update manager from software center I am not able to
reinstall it.
You will have to provide details of the error message you received.
Probably you want to seek help on a support forum; see
http://www.ubuntu.com/support.
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 13165 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13165
Then in synaptic select Origin and Complete remove bitdefender-scanner it
will ask do u want to remove also bitdefender-scanner-gui . Say yes.
Then apply and see that bitdefender-scanner-gui is still in
Multiarch works well now so such hacks are not necessary.
If you use --force-architecture to install something, that means that apt (and
thus synaptic) does not know about it. There is no need for synaptic to jump
through hoops to support this, instead you should configure multiarch on this
think synaptic is actually much more confusing because of
that change! It confsued me, and I wasted time trying to deal with it
and filing bug #1166568. I agree with what Daniel Hartwig wrote in
comment #27. I too would like to see the 2004 change reverted, so that
synaptic uses the global
On 31 May 2013 15:34, B Bobo 1166...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Thank you for explaining that.
Once setting the holds with dpkg or apt-mark, does
‘do-release-upgrade’ work as expected?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Summary changed:
- apt-get doesn't use the same pinning as synaptic
+ synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold
** Description changed:
+ ‘Lock Version’ in Synaptic uses apt_preferences(5) (“pinning”). This is
+ never recognized by non-Apt tools, e.g. dpkg. Also, as these settings
On 31 May 2013 04:33, Craig Olsen craigaw...@msn.com wrote:
Public bug reported:
It says I have 1 broken package to remove, but when I manually search
for it, it doesnt show.
Provide complete output from:
$ sudo apt-get install -f
status incomplete
These type of thing are most likely a
What do you mean “locked version”? There are multiple programs and
documents using this term to mean different things, please state exactly
how you “locked” these packages.
** Tags removed: apt update-manager-core
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Aptitude has no option ‘--purge’, this command line actually triggers
‘--purge-unused’ whose behaviour is correct. In the future we will
support ‘--purge’ as apt-get does and also fail for unrecognized
options.
This is importance: wishlist and not higher as there is no documented
expectation for
Apt (and therefore aptitude) takes it proxy settings from apt.conf or
environment. It is not possible to externally update aptitudes
environment once it is running, so that can not be fixed. Changes in
apt.conf could be found, but that is not usually how unix programs
operate and so is
Yes aptitude cli has numerous i18n issues.
Exactly yes–no prompts have been fixed in recent versions, but nothing
more.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Russian Ubuntu Translators (ubuntu-l10n-ru) = (unassigned)
**
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296982
Title:
cli aptitude proxy settings don't update until terminal is restarted
To
On 31 May 2013 12:49, B Bobo 1166...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Versions locked using Synaptic per Ubuntu Pinning Howto
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PinningHowto#line-97
and Ubuntu Apt Get Howto
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AptGet/Howto#line-67
[It seems the advise in those
On 31 May 2013 13:15, Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com wrote:
After applying this hold, confirm the changes with e.g.:
$ dpkg -s harpia | grep Status
Status: hold ok installed
At that point ‘apt-get upgrade’ should not remove the packages, and
‘apt-get dist-upgrade’ should give a warning.
I
B Bobo wrote:
You have been subscribed to a public bug:
The last column is called URI, but
this is wrong as it seems to be showing something more like Ubuntu
package location syntax, instead of properly formed URIs.
Please provide an example this data you consider to be mislabelled.
--
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Adam Stokes (adam-stokes) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103541
Title:
Please merge aptitude 0.6.8.2-1(main) from
After a long period of disinterest I am delcaring user-setup ok. It is
in aptitude that the duplicate config should be removed.
** Changed in: user-setup (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
google-mock is now in main, there is no reason for ubuntu builds to
continue ignoring part of the test suite with no-google-mock patch
** Affects: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Public bug reported:
Package: google-mock
Version: 1.6.0-0ubuntu3
This package represents significant and unwarranted deviation from the
Debian package. For example, it does cause FTBFS with aptitude.
Use of precompiled libgmock
---
The Google C++ Mocking Framework
On 15 May 2013 15:43, Marek Pietrucha mark.pietru...@gmail.com wrote:
Adding full stack of apt-get -f install:
Ok. Still no indication of fault in apt.
affects ubuntu/apt
status invalid
Preconfiguring packages ...
exim4-base failed to preconfigure, with exit status 1
(Reading database
In raring, glchess has been renamed to gnome-chess, and the package
glchess is *transitional*. The new command name is ‘gnome-chess’.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I have classified this bug as a bug in apt.
No error messages in that output are from apt and do-release-upgrade is
from ubuntu-release-upgrader-core not apt.
Richard Cheung (richardcheung-hk) wrote on 2013-05-19:
Hi,
I am also having this problem.
…
Can not run the upgrade
The error
On 15 May 2013 15:43, Marek Pietrucha mark.pietru...@gmail.com wrote:
Adding full stack of apt-get -f install:
Ok. Still no indication of fault in apt.
affects ubuntu/apt
status invalid
Preconfiguring packages ...
exim4-base failed to preconfigure, with exit status 1
(Reading database
** Changed in: apt
Importance: Unknown = Undecided
** Changed in: apt
Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #709661 = None
** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #709661
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709661
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
On 24 May 2013 15:31, Thomas Hotz 124...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Daniel have you got enough information about this bug?
Nothing that is not already in the report, which is sufficient to
identify a real issue.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
Again, why?
On 24 May 2013 15:51, Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 May 2013 15:31, Thomas Hotz 124...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Daniel have you got enough information about this bug?
Nothing that is not already in the report, which is sufficient to
identify a real issue.
So for the time
On 23 May 2013 23:05, piotr zimoch ebyt...@gmail.com wrote:
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = New
Why?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124895
Title:
On 15 May 2013 20:02, Daniel 1123...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
wine1.4 : Depends: wine1.4-i386 (= 1.4.1-0ubuntu5) but it is not
installable
So you probably want to enable i386 repositories to use wine:
$ sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386
On 15 May 2013 22:22, Daniel 1123...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386
Is this the way that each Ubuntu user should go? I never saw this
command before and I think it should not be necessary for
packages from the universe repository.
Usually it is not required. The
On 14 May 2013 16:12, Daniel 1123...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
** Attachment added: As of 2013-05-14, this is what I still get when trying
to install wine with current package database (apt-get update)
On 15 May 2013 09:43, Matt Heard m...@mattheard.net wrote:
** Package changed: ubuntu = apt (Ubuntu)
No. This is not sufficient to indicate a fault in apt:
post-removal script returned error code (1)
dpkg error /var/cache/apt/archives/exim4-base_4.76-3ubuntu3.2_amd64.deb
(--unpack)
It
On 11 May 2013 17:18, Jérôme 1178...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Public bug reported:
The random_sleep function is calling sleep. Thus the memory used by
anacron, the /etc/cron.daily/apt script is frozen for minutes when the
random_sleep blocks until the sleep program completes.
I think this
On 12 May 2013 02:37, Jérôme 1178...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Below is the output of ps :
---
j@lt:~$ ps axlf
F UID PID PPID PRI NIVSZ RSS WCHAN STAT TTYTIME COMMAND
(...)
1 0 812 1 20 0 2392 840 rt_sig Ss ? 0:00 anacron
-s
0 0 1615
** Package changed: uget (Ubuntu) = apt (Ubuntu)
No, I do not think so.
affects ubuntu/apt
status invalid
Bug description:
I'm trying to install a package that provides gtk/gtk.h which
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687
duplicate 1135687
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687
GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not
mapped
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 61619 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61619
duplicate 61619
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 61619
ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 61619
ntpdate in -minimal should have
On 11 May 2013 10:58, Steve Langasek steve.langa...@canonical.com wrote:
On Quantal, this does not appear to solve the problem described in bug
#1131512.
If you use update-manager to install updates, there is a remaining issue
with aptdaemon causing all updates to be marked as manually
** Also affects: apt-listchanges (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1137946
Title:
ChangeLog Stops full update on 12:10 Ubuntu
To
cat /etc/apt/listchanges.conf
[apt]
frontend=xterm-pager
email_address=root
confirm=1
save_seen=/var/lib/apt/listchanges.db
which=news headers
That is not a valid value for which.
In any case, it appears that with the versions in this upgrade there is
no new NEWS so there is nothing to
On 7 May 2013 06:11, Fernando Conesa 1069...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
The solution of Jorge worked for me without problem.
The change in the message won't affect forthcoming updates right?
I mean, for the 13.10, the message will be changed again?
You can always use a text editor to remove
** Changed in: distcc (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: distcc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel Hartwig (wigs)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
** Changed in: distcc (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: distcc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel Hartwig (wigs)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
On 6 May 2013 06:54, Jane Atkinson 1097...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
This problem, or something very similar, is still happening in 13.10
with synaptic v. 0.80~exp2
Or something very similar? Is it a crash under the same conditions,
at the same point or not?
Use apport to report a new bug
** Description changed:
This is happening on saucy testing installs, both with openbox and
unity. Both are built up from minimal installs using --no-install-
recommends to keep the system lightweight.
When I go to remove a residual config or an obsolete package, synaptic
locks up.
On 30 April 2013 17:12, Bertie Davel 1174...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Public bug reported:
Did a normal update of Ubuntu 12.04 via Software Updater. Restart
requested. After restart Software Updater does not want to run/open and
red error/stop icon is displayed in the top right toolbar.
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) = ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175895
Title:
do-release-upgrade fails: TypeError: decode() argument 1 must be
On 3 May 2013 20:24, Steve J. 1175...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 01:09:09AM -, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
This is a problem, because it renders the fix in this bug,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/923876 (Limit and
clean-up kernel images and headers
On 3 May 2013 22:11, Steve J. 1175...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Unattended-upgrades does perform
kernel updates, so it's likely installing/dist-upgrade-ing kernel upgrades as
new
packages (which must be why I'm seeing them as being marked 'manual').
Looks like an issue with
On 2 May 2013 22:57, Steve J. 1175...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Public bug reported:
Updates to the linux-image-* packages in Precise are being marked as
manually installed, regardless of the auto/manual flag on the existing
kernel packages. This happens when updating packages with apt,
On 1 May 2013 00:47, Adam Niedling 1174...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Exactly the same thing is happening with gcalctool. Apt-cache policy is
saying that it's installed, but when I try to start it Ubuntu is saying
that it's not installed.
Again, the program has been renamed. The old name no
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174509
Title:
Ubuntu 13.04 is saying that gnibbles is not installed but it is
To
krychek@ultraviolence:~$ gnibbles
The program 'gnibbles' is currently not installed. You can install it by
typing:
sudo apt-get install gnibbles
The database that provides this information is outdated on your system.
There is no package in raring that provides a ‘gnibbles’ binary, the
name
On 30 April 2013 09:49, Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 April 2013 03:56, Adam Niedling 1174...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
krychek@ultraviolence:~$ gnibbles
The program 'gnibbles' is currently not installed. You can install it by
typing:
sudo apt-get install gnibbles
On 30 April 2013 03:56, Adam Niedling 1174...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Public bug reported:
I do have gnibbles installed, I can even start it with the Launcher and
with the gnome-nibbles command in the terminal, but issuing gnibbles
says it's not installed even thou apt-cache policy is
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687
GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not
mapped
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 882825 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882825
duplicate 882825
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 882825
Does not save the configuration file under ~/.config/
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 882825
Does not save the
On 26 April 2013 21:19, dino99 929...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
When marking bugs as fix released, please indicate the version and if
possible quote the changelog entry.
--
You received this bug notification because you
On 26 April 2013 21:21, Adam Dingle a...@yorba.org wrote:
Public bug reported:
To see the problem:
1. Start Synaptic.
2. Resize the window to be larger than the default size.
3. Close Synaptic and run it again.
The window will briefly flash into view at the size which you set in
step 2,
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = New
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = New
** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = New
** Changed in: gegl (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = New
** Changed in: gnome-games (Ubuntu)
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libcwidget3_0.5.12-4ubuntu3_amd64.deb (--unpack):
short read in buffer_copy (backend dpkg-deb during
`./usr/lib/libcwidget.so.3.0.0')
Looks like a transient error. Anyone seeing this in
On 24 April 2013 14:25, Ravuri suresh linuxtestingto...@gmail.com wrote:
Public bug reported:
Installed ubuntu 12.0.4.1 by ISO image.
when i try to add PPa:ubuntu-wine/PPa to repository to congiure outlook
getting below message:
That does not appear to be an error. What is your point?
Restoring previous status, whose info was not delivered to me.
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1172138
On 26 April 2013 08:05, Brian Murray br...@ubuntu.com wrote:
This fix doesn't seem to have made it into raring. Where did you apply
it?
apt (0.9.7.8~exp1) experimental; urgency=low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On 23 April 2013 07:47, Thomas touff...@9online.fr wrote:
Public bug reported:
After applying changes aptitude returns an error :
What changes? Attach the _relevant_ part of /var/log/aptitude and
/var/log/apt/history.log.
ldconfig deferred processing now taking place
Error
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687
GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not
mapped
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687
GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not
mapped
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097532 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097532
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097532
synaptic crashed with SIGSEGV in File() (or in pkgRecords::Lookup()) when
trying to remove residual config files for packages without the fields:
On 22 April 2013 18:38, Stephan Springer launchpa...@lini.de wrote:
I checked by trying to install wine. The dependency resolution only
grumbles about one “recommends” which can't be resolved, which is
probably okay.
gettext?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Project changed: emacs = emacs-defaults (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171117
Title:
Alias emacs to emacs24 during install
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Scott, any chance of an SRU?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
Title:
gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with
gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not
(guessing this is shell related)
** Package changed: emacs-defaults (Ubuntu) = unity (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171252
Title:
A program is still running dialog doesnt
** Package changed: emacs-defaults (Ubuntu) = emacs23 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078116
Title:
Traditional emacs color configuration no longer works since 12.04
To
** Package changed: emacs-defaults (Ubuntu) = emacs24 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077639
Title:
Text repaint problems in Emacs
To manage notifications about this bug go
On 22 April 2013 20:30, Stephan Springer launchpa...@lini.de wrote:
Yes:
See bug #954029. Trivial fix, could be SRU.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687
GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not
mapped
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097532 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097532
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097532
synaptic crashed with SIGSEGV in File() (or in pkgRecords::Lookup()) when
trying to remove residual config files for packages without the fields:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097532 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097532
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1168648
Synaptic crashes when selecting one or several files when using the filter
not installed (residual configuration).
** This bug has been marked a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097532 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097532
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097532
synaptic crashed with SIGSEGV in File() (or in pkgRecords::Lookup()) when
trying to remove residual config files for packages without the fields:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097532 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097532
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097532
synaptic crashed with SIGSEGV in File() (or in pkgRecords::Lookup()) when
trying to remove residual config files for packages without the fields:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097532 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097532
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097532
synaptic crashed with SIGSEGV in File() (or in pkgRecords::Lookup()) when
trying to remove residual config files for packages without the fields:
On 17 April 2013 17:25, Tim t...@feathertop.org wrote:
Laney, pretty sure it was already fixed in Q,via upstream.
Confirm this, with upstream hat on. The fix appears from version
0.6.8.1.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
101 - 200 of 732 matches
Mail list logo
