** Changed in: ball (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/935038
Title:
ball version 1.4.1+20111206-3 FTBFS on armhf
** Changed in: clhep (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Confirmed
** Changed in: clhep (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) = (unassigned)
** Tags added: patch patch-accepted-debian
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Changed in: ball (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/935038
Title:
ball version 1.4.1+20111206-3 FTBFS on armhf
Bug #713377 refers to another failing test. Changing to #713301, that
refers to this same failing test.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #733301
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733301
** Changed in: clhep (Debian)
Status: Fix Released = Unknown
** Changed in:
** Changed in: clhep (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251844
Title:
clhep: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: make -j1 check
I have found a possible fix to this bug. Discussing it with upstream,
and waiting for confirmation before proposing that fix here.
Upstream bug: https://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/index.php?104289
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
-nspostgres (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
Status: New
** Affects: aolserver4-nspostgres (Debian)
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Tags: ftbfs
** Changed in: aolserver4-nspostgres (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned
** Branch linked: lp:~scarneiro/ubuntu/trusty/aolserver4-nspostgres/fix-
for-1303405
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303405
Title:
aolserver4-nspostgres FTBFS on trusty-proposed
To
** Changed in: accessodf (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed
** Changed in: accessodf (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
Public bug reported:
Full build log:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accessodf/0.1-4/+build/5866883/+files
/buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-i386.accessodf_0.1-4_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
Snippet:
-compile-depend:
-do-compile:
[mkdir] Created dir: /build/buildd/accessodf-0.1/build/empty
[javac]
** Changed in: accessodf (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302446
Title:
accessodf FTBFS on i386
To manage
This one has already been fixed. How do I close this bug ?
** Changed in: accessodf (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: accessodf (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Hi, I'm a newbie contributor, and I have a question about this bug:
this seems to have been corrected in Ubuntu since version 3.0-12.
What else needs to be done to close this bug?
Thanks, and apologies as I'm sure this is such a newbie question.
--
You received this bug notification because
According to what is stated in upstream bug, brasero handles /tmp use
differently now, which basically means that this bug report can be
resolved / closed.
Is this the right way to deal with this ? Shall we close this bug report
according to what upstream did ?
Thanks.
--
You received this bug
According to what Pedro said on #3 comment, this has been fixed.
Looking into the corresponding commit in upstream git repository, and
comparing that fix with the current version, it seems that it is fixed
in current version.
Shall we close this bug ?
Thanks.
--
You received this bug
Couldn't reproduce this myself on Ubuntu 12.04. Shall we close it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854155
Title:
Conflicting Alt hotkeys in System monitor
To manage notifications
** Changed in: remotetea (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888995
Title:
remotetea version 1.0.7-2 failed to build
** Changed in: libnb-svnclientadapter-java (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888970
Title:
libnb-svnclientadapter
** Changed in: jbossas4 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888943
Title:
jbossas4 version 4.2.3.GA-6 failed to build
Hi,
I have built this package on a sbuild chroot for Quantal, and it was
successful. Should this bug be closed? Should a no-change rebuild be
proposed referencing in the debin changelog entry ?
Best regards,
Sebastian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Thanks Ilya!
I'm sorry i haven't been able to reply to this sooner. Your remarks and
corrections are very helpful to a newbie like me!
Again, thanks for your work.
Sebastian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Branch unlinked: lp:~scarneiro/ubuntu/oneiric/xoscope/fix-for-755956
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755956
Title:
xoscope version 2.0-3.1 failed to build on i386
To manage
Patch forwarded to Debian. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638395
Thanks.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #638395
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638395
** Also affects: geoip (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638395
** Changed in: phaseshift (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) = (unassigned)
** Changed in: phaseshift (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
** Branch unlinked: lp:~scarneiro/ubuntu/oneiric/phaseshift/fix-
for-755937
--
You received this bug
Submitted to Debian
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756155
Title:
pornview version 0.2pre1-11ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Thank you, Marc!
Best regards.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755934
Title:
stereograph version 0.30a-6 failed to build on i386
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: phaseshift (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: phaseshift (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
** Changed in: setpwc (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: setpwc (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
** Changed in: stereograph (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
** Changed in: stereograph (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Changed in: vdkbuilder2 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756079
Title:
vdkbuilder2 version 2.4.0-4.1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: gupnp-ui (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749152
Title:
gupnp-ui version 0.1.1-3 failed to build on i386
To
** Changed in: pornview (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756155
Title:
pornview version 0.2pre1-11ubuntu1 failed to build on
** Changed in: gupnp-ui (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749152
Title:
gupnp-ui version 0.1.1-3 failed
Hi,
I like to point out that I haven't been able to reproduce this bug.
I tried to build this package on sbuild and pbuilder, and it works fine
for Natty and Oneiric. I attached one of the sbuild logs.
** Attachment added: ftgl_2.1.3~rc5-3-i386-20110721-1613
Public bug reported:
In the .pc file included in libgnet-dev are outdated references to glib
include directories. As glib libraries have changed its location, these
references are causing other packages to ftbfs. Rebuilding this package
seems to fix this issue:
Current cflags of this package
Part of the problem with this bug has to do with outdated references in
libgnet-dev to glib include dirs.
A bug has been filed to solve this issue in gnet:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnet/+bug/814374
Besides that, there are some problems in this package regarding indirect
linking
and a patch has been submitted to fix
this issue.
** Affects: vdk2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
Status: New
** Affects: vdk2 (Debian)
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: vdk2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned
Public bug reported:
To comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch,
packages which contain .la files which need to be stripped of the
dependency_libs variable.
Packages should *NOT* remove the .la file itself at this stage because
other packages still expect to find the
** Description changed:
To comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch,
packages which contain .la files which need to be stripped of the
dependency_libs variable.
Packages should *NOT* remove the .la file itself at this stage because
other packages still expect
** Changed in: vdkbuilder2 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756079
Title:
vdkbuilder2 version 2.4.0-4.1
** Changed in: pornview (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756155
Title:
pornview version 0.2pre1-11ubuntu1
** Changed in: osptoolkit (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756018
Title:
osptoolkit version 3.4.2-1 failed to build on i386
To
Can the status of this report changed to Fix Released?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756030
Title:
opendrim-lmp-battery version 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
To manage
I phrased my question horribly... I wanted to know if I am forgetting to
do something to advance this bug to fixed, since the proposal I
submitted was approved. Is it because it isn't merged although the
proposal was approved?
Sorry about the misunderstanding.
Thanks, Matthias.
--
You
Andreas is right.
I was talking about the proposal I make which has been approved this
week. Since it was approved, I was asking what else has to be done to
promote the bug status to a fixed one.
Thanks Andreas and Matthias.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Seeing in detail my branch merge proposal, I see now that it's review is
still active.
I guess that is why this report is still In Progress.
Sorry for the noise, guys. May be it would have been better for ask
this in #ubuntu-motu instead of adding the noise here.
Again, I'm sorry.-
Thanks
Patch forwarded upstream: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=63
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #63
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=63
** Also affects: libmpeg3 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=63
** Changed in: osptoolkit (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756018
Title:
osptoolkit version 3.4.2-1 failed
Patch forwarded Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633152
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #633152
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633152
** Also affects: gtk-led-askpass (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633152
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-physicalasset (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-physicalasset (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-cpu (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-cpu (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-ssh (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-ssh (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-recordlog (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-recordlog (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-baseserver (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-baseserver (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-ip (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-ip (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-pci (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-pci (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-bios (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-bios (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-ethernetport (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-ethernetport (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-os (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-os (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-dns (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro)
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-dns (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Of course. I will report that to Debian and link the bug report here.
Thank you.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770853
Title:
gtk-led-askpass version 0.10-2ubuntu1 failed to build
** Changed in: mplinuxman (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181372
Title:
Please update mplinuxman to 1.5 version
To manage notifications
Patch forwarded to Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631251
Regards.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #631251
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631251
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I have installed Firefox from natty-proposed on saturday and using it
without any regression since that day.
Best regards.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798484
Title:
Tracking bug
Patch forwarded to Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631141
Best Regards,
Sebastián.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #631141
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631141
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Seems to me like this bug was fixed in 1.0.1-0ubuntu15 related to this
one (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/couchdb/+bug/758895) .
When I test the last development version (1.0.1-0ubuntu17) doing an
sbuild, it woks fine. Can this bug be closed ? Attached is sbuild
corresponding to
Seems to me like this bug has been fixed at Debian
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556335), and then has
been synced in Ubuntu. This is the last change:
samdump2 (1.1.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Link with -lcrypto instead of -lssl. (Closes:
Hi. I have a question regarding this issue.
I have downloaded and built it and seems to build ok. I attached the
build log.
The steps I took to do this is:
1) branch it from bzr: bzr branch lp:ubuntu/samdump2
2) build source package bzr bd -- -S -us -uc
3) Using pbuilder, I built it: sudo
Hi, I have made a patch to correct this issue, and I am submitting it
for your review.
Please let me know if it's okay or what corrections need to be done.
Thanks in advance,
Sebastian.
** Patch added: modglue_1.17-2ubuntu1.debdiff
I have corrected the problem I was having in building the package in
gcc-4.6. Attached is a debdiff of the updated package.
Please review theses changes and let me know anything that needs to be
corrected for these to be ok. It is one of my first contributions and I
need your comments in order
** Patch added: mplinuxman_1.5-0ubuntu1.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mplinuxman/+bug/181372/+attachment/2165750/+files/mplinuxman_1.5-0ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hi,
I have made the abovementioned changes to the package, and yet i am
having problems buildind the package in oneiric under gcc-4.6. This
issue is related to (LP: #770855).
In the meantime, i have put together a PPA package for natty, that does
build correctly. If anyone need to use it, i
** Branch unlinked: lp:~scarneiro/ubuntu/oneiric/mplinuxman/bug-770855
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770855
Title:
mplinuxman version 1.4-0ubuntu2 failed to build on amd64 with
Daniel,
you are right about both comments.
I have made a mistake when modifying the makefile for this package. Even
though I have built the package, i did not check what the package
installed. I will have to be much more careful in the future about
testing packages, to avoid this huge
** Branch linked: lp:~scarneiro/ubuntu/oneiric/mplinuxman/bug-770855
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770855
Title:
mplinuxman version 1.4-0ubuntu2 failed to build on amd64 with
** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250540
Title:
gedit cannot save to sftp location
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Hi,
I don't know if anoyone is working on it. I made a package for version
1.5. Attached is the corresponding debdiff.
Would you please indicate me if this package is correct, and in case this is
correct, what has to be done to upload this package?
Best regards.
** Patch added: debdiff to
Just a newbie question, looking at the upstream bug, it says that this
issue is caused by a bug in gtksourceview, and not in this application.
Shouldn't the bug report be submitted in the aforementioned library,
instead of gedit ?
Sorry if I am totally wrong, just trying to understand what the
Looking at the upstream bug, it appears that this is really a bug in
package gvfs.
Looking at the change made upstream on that package, and comparing with
the package gvfs that was released with natty, it appears that this
change has already been made.
Beside that, I repeat the steps outlined to
79 matches
Mail list logo
