[Bug 1967784] Re: After install reboot was unsuccessful with dark screen.

2022-04-04 Thread lunix
Note: This bug-report was sent from 21.10 running off a USB installation stick! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967784 Title: After install reboot was unsuccessful with dark screen.

[Bug 1967784] [NEW] After install reboot was unsuccessful with dark screen.

2022-04-04 Thread lunix
Public bug reported: Installation of 21.10 beta 4-2-2022 went well. Both screens were normal and active. Reboot did not produce a screen to login, they were both dark following the DELL post screen. I have a DELL XPS I5 with two monitors. One on DVI and the other a Display Video connection.

[Bug 1876506] Re: eoan to focal upgrade hangs when lvm snapshot is present

2020-08-17 Thread lunix
I apologize if this is not relevant to this blocking bug. I am trying to help a friend. Machine is dual boot Windows 10 and Ubuntu 18.04 Has Extended Partition where Ubuntu went into Parition 5. Machine worked fine with 18.04. Tried upgrade offered to Ubuntu 19,04 which failed and won't no

[Bug 1292041] Re: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

2016-08-10 Thread lunix
Please see Bug # 1612010 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292041 Title: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1612010] [NEW] Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

2016-08-10 Thread lunix
Public bug reported: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen (saw it via Bug # 1292041 now closed) Ctrl=Alt+L or Super+L shortcut works and blanks the screen requiring me to type my password again to activate session. However my System-Settings -> Brightness & Lock is set to: Turn screen off when

[Bug 791506] Re: Using an external USB microphone.

2014-11-26 Thread lunix
This bug is still happening in both 12.04 and 12.10. Simple to reproduce. Use laptop with analogue built in Microphone. Plug in a USB Microphone and switch to it. When rebooting Ubuntu the analogue microphone is re-activated and NOT the last Microphone used which was the USB Microphone. In

[Bug 791506] Re: Using an external USB microphone.

2014-11-26 Thread lunix
I am rummy, I meant to say 14.04 and 14.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791506 Title: Using an external USB microphone. To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1251020] [NEW] uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center

2013-11-13 Thread lunix
Public bug reported: I have used uucp over TCP for years. From the Ubuntu Software Center the installation attempt hangs and never completes for Saucy., 13.10. I have been using it for years. The hang takes place on both a 64-bit and 32-bit machine. Please fix the software center so

[Bug 1251020] Re: uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center

2013-11-13 Thread lunix
This can be closed. It turned out that the hang was caused by a window hidden behind the Software Center with a question requiring input via the mouse click. Sorry! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to uucp in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1251020] Re: uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center

2013-11-13 Thread lunix
** Changed in: uucp (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to uucp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251020 Title: uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center To

[Bug 1251020] [NEW] uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center

2013-11-13 Thread lunix
Public bug reported: I have used uucp over TCP for years. From the Ubuntu Software Center the installation attempt hangs and never completes for Saucy., 13.10. I have been using it for years. The hang takes place on both a 64-bit and 32-bit machine. Please fix the software center so

[Bug 1251020] Re: uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center

2013-11-13 Thread lunix
This can be closed. It turned out that the hang was caused by a window hidden behind the Software Center with a question requiring input via the mouse click. Sorry! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1251020] Re: uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center

2013-11-13 Thread lunix
** Changed in: uucp (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251020 Title: uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center To manage notifications

[Bug 1116315] Re: Sound recording with Ubuntu 12 on EeePC 1001PX

2013-11-09 Thread lunix
I was disappointed to find that on both 13.04 and 13.10 that Sound Recorder is still broken. It looks like we don't have a maintainer. Audacity does work so at least we have a work around. My Grandson uses Sound Recorder to practice his Saxaphone and it is used for other purposes as well by

[Bug 1198497] [NEW] Installation fails when fdisk doesn't have enough spare slots

2013-07-06 Thread lunix
Public bug reported: Multiple times now Ubuntu installation fails without any information when the fdisk table is full. I.E. no spare slots to create an extended partition. This has happened on multiple HP machines with WIndows 7 pre-loaded where a restore partition is present along with the

[Bug 1198497] Re: Installation fails when fdisk doesn't have enough spare slots

2013-07-06 Thread lunix
Here is the actual gparted snapshot from the last time I had an installation fail. Keep mind that this has happened on many machines and I think a user friendly message is mandatory rather than no message on failure. ** Attachment added: Screenshot from 2013-07-02 01:36:51.png

Re: [Bug 886975] Re: Lenovo sound chip Conexant CX20549 Venice doesn't work correctly.

2012-11-19 Thread lunix
I really appreciate your working on this. Unfortunately the computer with the problem is owned by a friend in another town. I don't often see him and certainly don't want to upset his stability. If no one else can do this then I would consider driving to him and trying the fix. I was just

[Bug 391227] Re: [FUJITSU SIEMENS LIFEBOOK S6410] hibernate/resume failure

2012-10-26 Thread Lunix
The issue stil exists. It screen is just black but not in hibernate mode and if i wanna come back to the system it dont do anything, the screen remains black, only a hard reset by use the power button solve the problem and start the Lifebook again. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 135088] Re: Resume from hibernate not working

2012-10-26 Thread Lunix
FSC s6410 Ubuntu 12.04 LTS The Bug still exists. The screen is just black but not in hibernate mode and if i wanna come back to the system it dont do anything, the screen remains black, only a hard reset by use the power button solve the problem and start the Lifebook again. -- You received

[Bug 886975] Re: Lenovo sound chip Conexant CX20549 Venice doesn't work correctly.

2012-07-26 Thread lunix
Anyone have a clue when a fix might make it into an update or a release? My friend doesn't want to do a patch but prefers to wait for an official fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1015732] [NEW] Double entry for Skype in Software Center not seen in Synaptic

2012-06-20 Thread lunix
Public bug reported: I am noticing that the Software Center has two entries on my system for Skype. They are both identical although different wording. Mine says: Skype (followed by stars (502)) skype (Notice the lowercase 's' in Skype. Then below is another instance that reads: Skype (followed

[Bug 1015732] Re: Double entry for Skype in Software Center not seen in Synaptic

2012-06-20 Thread lunix
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015732 Title: Double entry for Skype in Software Center not seen in Synaptic To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 891613] Re: Skype Icon shows twice while seaching for it at software-center

2012-06-20 Thread lunix
I am not 100% sure of this comment but I think the double entries only show up when Ubuntu 11.04 has been installed via an upgrade path. Fresh install seems to fix the double entry issue for Skype. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 891613] Re: Skype Icon shows twice while seaching for it at software-center

2012-06-20 Thread lunix
I did some testing and now have some new insight for the lucky person that might help out with this issue. If I do a fresh install of Ubuntu 11.10 and then bring up the Software Center it shows Skype as something I can click on. If I install Skype that way two bad things happen. 1) I get the

[Bug 891613] Re: Skype Icon shows twice while seaching for it at software-center

2012-06-20 Thread lunix
Synaptic shows a single entry so I don't see any issue with it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891613 Title: Skype Icon shows twice while seaching for it at software-center To

[Bug 982357] Re: I can not get proper resolution for my Samsung SyncMaster 226BW monitor

2012-04-18 Thread lunix
Bypassing my KVM as you suggested resolved the issue. I appologize for bugreporting this considering that I should have done this test first. Many thanks for your help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 982357] [NEW] I can not get proper resolution for my Samsunjg SyncMaster 226BW monitor

2012-04-15 Thread lunix
Public bug reported: My monitor is a Samsung SyncMaster 226BW. It has an optimal resolution of 1680x1050 which Ubuntu 12.04 is not finding. All I get is 1024x768. I am able to manually set the optimal resolution with the xrandr command although I am still having trouble making it stick through

[Bug 982357] Re: I can not get proper resolution for my Samsunjg SyncMaster 226BW monitor

2012-04-15 Thread lunix
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982357 Title: I can not get proper resolution for my Samsunjg SyncMaster 226BW monitor To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 982357] Re: I can not get proper resolution for my Samsunjg SyncMaster 226BW monitor

2012-04-15 Thread lunix
This issue has been observed throughout many previous versions of Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982357 Title: I can not get proper resolution for my Samsunjg SyncMaster

[Bug 843431] Re: Logitech camera microphone does not work

2011-09-24 Thread lunix
I did a fresh install of Ubuntu Beta 2 and the microphone now works for me. I'll let the original reporter status this and close it if he no longer has the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 843431] Re: Logitech camera microphone does not work

2011-09-14 Thread lunix
Latest 3.0.0-11.18 kernel didn't help for me either. I am using a Logitech C910. Camera works but not the microphone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/843431 Title: Logitech camera

[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep

2011-01-18 Thread lunix
I finally got up the nerve to add the kernel to my Intel based 64-bit system. The error message is indeed gone. I got out a stop watch and the boot time for me is 25-seconds prior and after the patch so no increase in speed booting but I don't have to look at the error message any longer which is

Re: [Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep

2011-01-15 Thread lunix
Once i figured out to install headers-all before headers, it went smoothly - thanks so much for the patch! -- I have been resisting putting the patch on as I share this machine with others and I didn't want to upset anything or screw up in the order. I suppose I could just boot from one

[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep

2011-01-10 Thread lunix
Its not clear to me that I would call it a cosmetic issue since quite a delay is introduced on each boot. Does the fix eliminate that delay? Also, what is considered cosmetic to a programmer is not cosmetic to grandpa or an ordinary user of the OS in my opinion. Will this patch be

[Bug 366535] Re: Kubuntu registers itself in /boot/grub/menu.lst as Ubuntu

2010-12-05 Thread lunix
Out of curiosity, why do a dual boot at all? Instead I was thinking one could install Ubuntu and then also install the KDE desktop. At login time you are allowed to choose which of many desktops you want to run for the session. This would give you both worlds without having to tie up so much

[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep

2010-12-03 Thread lunix
Perhaps someone can explain to me why Ubuntu hasn't released a patch to fix this issue? Given the number of people having the issue and the dialogue that has taken place one would think something substantive would have happened by now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep

2010-10-26 Thread lunix
sudo update-initramfs -c -k 2.6.35-22-generic worked without an error message but did not solve the problem for me being discussed here. -- Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep

2010-10-24 Thread lunix
I could easily be mis-remembering but after doing an upgrade from 10.04 - 10.10 everything worked fine. This system is an I5 64-bit installation and it has Ugh, windows 7 as a bootable partition. I never boot into Windows 7 but a relative needed something done from Windows 7 so I did allowed it

[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep

2010-10-22 Thread lunix
What bothers me is that the error message is not accurate. modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep: No such file or directory modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep: No such file or directory When I go to this

[Bug 545065] Re: pulseaudio ratelimit.c messages and jittery sound

2010-06-30 Thread lunix
I could stop the ratelimit.c messages bei changing the log-level. To do that edit /etc/pulse/daemon.conf: Change the line: ;log-level = notice into: log-level = error I don't have stottering. -- pulseaudio ratelimit.c messages and jittery sound https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545065 You

Re: [Bug 353126] Re: Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org prior to release 7.5

2010-04-19 Thread lunix
Bryce, If you are on Skype contact me via separate email and we can test this out and have clarify the issue. I am about 96% sure that I tested this with the non-proprietary nvidia driver with a friend and we still had the problem. If that is the case I am not happy about the bug being closed.

Re: [Bug 353126] Re: Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org prior to release 7.5

2010-04-15 Thread lunix
The problem is still here Lucid - Lucid. The only way it works is if all screen enhancements, i.e. Compiz is turned off. No refresh happens if any of the special Compiz features are deployed. With all turned off then screen refreshes to the initiating machine. On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:29 PM,

[Bug 521955] [NEW] second user ends up with white rectangle on desktop that can not be removed without logging off.

2010-02-14 Thread lunix
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.5 Description:Ubuntu 9.10 Release:9.10 How to reproduce. 1) create a second user 2) Use switch user to login to that session and login which typically comes up on the CTRL-ALT-F9 key 3) Switch back via CTRL-ALT-F7 to first user

[Bug 521955] Re: second user ends up with white rectangle on desktop that can not be removed without logging off.

2010-02-14 Thread lunix
** Attachment added: white-rectangle.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39200530/white-rectangle.png ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39200531/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt

[Bug 521955] Re: second user ends up with white rectangle on desktop that can not be removed without logging off.

2010-02-14 Thread lunix
I just learned that if I kill nautilus the white triangle disappears. -- second user ends up with white rectangle on desktop that can not be removed without logging off. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 514997] [NEW] Dell E153Fpf 15 monitor not supported for native resolution

2010-01-30 Thread lunix
Public bug reported: I am on Ubuntu 9.10. This is a feature request. I am using a Dell E153FPf 15 lcd monitor and it is not being recognized, so it defaults to a very low resolution compared to the native resolution. 640 X 480 and 800 X 600. The native resolution is 1024 X 768 @ 60 Hz. I

[Bug 514997] Re: Dell E153Fpf 15 monitor not supported for native resolution

2010-01-30 Thread lunix
** Attachment added: As request. I ran it multiple times but I don't see any ID http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38572640/xrandr_output.txt -- Dell E153Fpf 15 monitor not supported for native resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514997 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 514997] Re: Dell E153Fpf 15 monitor not supported for native resolution

2010-01-30 Thread lunix
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1024 x 768, maximum 2048 x 2048 VGA1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (0xec) normal (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 0mm x 0mm Identifier: 0x3a Timestamp: 41719 Subpixel: unknown Clones: CRTC: 0

[Bug 477978] Re: AT SPI Registry Wrapper not responding when I try to shut down

2009-12-08 Thread lunix
Same problem here. I removed both at-spi entries from startup programs without any effects. -- AT SPI Registry Wrapper not responding when I try to shut down https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477978 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 378918] [NEW] SAMSUNG SyncMaster 930B not recognized using Nvidia GeForce 6200

2009-05-20 Thread lunix
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-nv NVIDIA config doesn't detect my Samsung SyncMaster 930B LCD monitor. It comes up as unknown as a CRT. I am using an NVIDIA GeForce 6200 graphics adapter card. lspci | grep -i nvidia returns: 1:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia

[Bug 378918] Re: SAMSUNG SyncMaster 930B not recognized using Nvidia GeForce 6200

2009-05-20 Thread lunix
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27001917/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: LsHal.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27001918/LsHal.txt ** Attachment added: LsMod.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27001919/LsMod.txt ** Attachment added: LsPci.txt

[Bug 366535] [NEW] Kubuntu registers itself in /boot/grub/menu.lst as Ubuntu

2009-04-24 Thread lunix
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub-choose-default I installed Ubuntu first and then Kubuntu as a dual boot on a 160-GB harddrive. All went well. The only problem is that Kubuntu registers itself in /boot/grub/menu.lst as Ubuntu so I have two Ubuntu's and I can't determine which