Public bug reported:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
affects ubuntu
status new
importance wishlist
subscribe ubuntu-sponsors
done
Please sync mutrace 0.2.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
All changelog entries:
mutrace (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial
Public bug reported:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
affects ubuntu
status new
importance wishlist
subscribe ubuntu-sponsors
done
Please sync latrace 0.5.10.20110523-1 (universe) from Debian unstable
(main)
All changelog entries:
latrace (0.5.10.20110523-1) unstable;
is this related to:
http://heartbeat.skype.com/2011/05/problems_signing_into_skype_an.html
???
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788573
Title:
Skype won't start
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787091
Title:
Unable to use USB device in KVM quest
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
A.Kromic,
It could well be, but with (potential) kernel bugs the best practice is
to never duplicate, as the problem could be architecture specific or
caused by certain drivers. Best to let them be investigated
individually.
It's different with user space bugs as the code will be the same no
I am not sure what changed but I tried starting hostapd yesterday and
everything is working now, thanks for the fix.
** Changed in: hostapd (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
We're closing this bug since it is has been some time with no response from the
original reporter. However, if the issue still exists please feel free to
reopen with the requested information. Also, if you could, please test against
the latest development version of Ubuntu, since this
this was closed by mistake, setting it back to incomplete.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760161
Title:
Very high memory usage
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
karmic is EOL
** Also affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: New = Won't Fix
** Changed in: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apparmor
configured_profile_names() in /lib/apparmor/functions greps for '\^'
which stops the shipped usr.bin.firefox profile from loading during
apparmor restart or apparmor reload.
The firefox profile is named
Sorry, missed the installed apparmor version, it is: 2.6.1-0ubuntu3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788616
Title:
configured_profile_names() in /lib/apparmor/functions breaks eg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
wasn't assigned to the right component when fix uploaded:
unity-place-applications (0.2.46-0ubuntu4) oneiric; urgency=low
* Cherry-pick some fixes:
- Allow the Core category to be included under All Applications (and hence
show up in Dash searches as well). This means that one can
Just to understand the motive of the decision: what do you think makes
breaking a convention so less worse than breaking a standard?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762505
Title:
This bug was fixed in the package software-center - 4.1.4
---
software-center (4.1.4) oneiric; urgency=low
[ Michael Vogt ]
* utils/update-software-center-agent:
- check for SOFTWARE_CENTER_NO_SC_AGENT in the environment
and if found, do not run the
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #512471
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512471
** Also affects: gtimelog (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512471
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
You have been subscribed to a public security bug by Jamie Strandboge
(jdstrand):
WS-Security policy implemented in CLC requires both a Timestamp and
the Body element to be signed. However, because the logic for verifying
signatures for these
Suspend/resume with the proposed kernel works as well, but only tested
twice. Great work, thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788539
Title:
[T520, Lucid, Natty kernel] Resume
OK. The problem was that I had checked the option to copy music to my
library when importing. I unchecked that option and cleared out all
the duplicate files in the file system as well as in my music library.
Now startup is much faster. I guess the base bug is invalid, though
this is still
There seem to be a few things that can cause slowdown here. Having
copy_on_import enabled is one of them, and I think it is also the cause
of all the dupes and other similar problems. I wonder if we should
perhaps patch this option out, as it is one of the worst misfeatures a
music player could
While I'm at it: some improved translation. This patch for po/de.po
includes the previous one.
** Patch added: Improved translation. Includes previous fix for shortcut
problem.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #37629
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37629
** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel via
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37629
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** Changed in: update-manager
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Sorry, I should have requested that this bug be closed.
I used dpkg to remove and purge the python package, then apt-get
installed ubuntu-desktop which, aside from losing a very few custom
settings, worked perfectly.
I don't know if that indicates a package corrupted during download, or
if, by
was filed against wrong component during the upload, copying manually
there:
unity-place-applications (0.2.46-0ubuntu4) oneiric; urgency=low
* Cherry-pick some fixes:
- Allow the Core category to be included under All Applications (and hence
show up in Dash searches as well). This
We're closing this bug since it is has been some time with no response from the
original reporter. However, if the issue still exists please feel free to
reopen with the requested information. Also, if you could, please test against
the latest development version of Ubuntu, since this
** Branch unlinked: lp:ubuntu/natty-proposed/im-switch
** Branch unlinked: lp:ubuntu/natty-proposed/language-selector
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663776
Title:
[dash] Search
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 276518 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276518
Same here.
[mi] EQ overflowing. The server is probably stuck in an infinite loop.
Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x28) [0x45fcc8]
1: /usr/bin/X (mieqEnqueue+0x1f4) [0x45b344]
2: /usr/bin/X
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox
First sorry for my englisch! Iḿ working with a AVR Microcontrollerboard
and Ethersexsoftware and basic http authorisation on my website . The
program works not correct. At the first time when i have entered the
user and password the website of
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788619
Title:
Website with authorisation ask again and again for the password
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Using the Cloned MAC Address feature in Network Manager (with a generic
MAC address), the connection failed to establish for a public wireless
network with no security in Ubuntu Natty 11.04 on my Dell Inspiron R14.
I tried the same thing on a hp EliteBook 6930p with Ubuntu Maverick
10.10 (not up
Excellent! Thank you for taking the time to make those reproduction
steps. Much appreciated!
Can you file new reports for those 2 bugs? The bug about the install
problem should be filed against 'ubiquity (ubuntu)', and the bug about
the problem with the modem should be filed against 'linux
Oh, and feel free to copy and paste the reproduction steps you made into
the new reports.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782338
Title:
error update to ubuntu 10.10
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: telepathy-logger (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/785178
Title:
telepathy-logger takes 99% CPU
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, your crash report is either missing or
challenging to deal with as a .crash file. Please follow these
instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can
be dealt with by the automatic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, your crash report is either missing or
challenging to deal with as a .crash file. Please follow these
instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can
be dealt with by the automatic
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, your crash report is either missing or
challenging to deal with as a .crash file. Please follow these
instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can
be dealt with by the automatic
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, your crash report is either missing or
challenging to deal with as a .crash file. Please follow these
instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can
be dealt with by the automatic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
We're closing this bug since it is has been some time with no response from the
original reporter. However, if the issue still exists please feel free to
reopen with the requested information. Also, if you could, please test against
the latest development version of Ubuntu, since this
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
We're closing this bug since it is has been some time with no response from the
original reporter. However, if the issue still exists please feel free to
reopen with the requested information. Also, if you could, please test against
the latest development version of Ubuntu, since this
We're closing this bug since it is has been some time with no response from the
original reporter. However, if the issue still exists please feel free to
reopen with the requested information. Also, if you could, please test against
the latest development version of Ubuntu, since this
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
We're closing this bug since it is has been some time with no response from the
original reporter. However, if the issue still exists please feel free to
reopen with the requested information. Also, if you could, please test against
the latest development version of Ubuntu, since this
We're closing this bug since it is has been some time with no response from the
original reporter. However, if the issue still exists please feel free to
reopen with the requested information. Also, if you could, please test against
the latest development version of Ubuntu, since this
We're closing this bug since it is has been some time with no response from the
original reporter. However, if the issue still exists please feel free to
reopen with the requested information. Also, if you could, please test against
the latest development version of Ubuntu, since this
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
We're closing this bug since it is has been some time with no response from the
original reporter. However, if the issue still exists please feel free to
reopen with the requested information. Also, if you could, please test against
the latest development version of Ubuntu, since this
We're closing this bug since it is has been some time with no response from the
original reporter. However, if the issue still exists please feel free to
reopen with the requested information. Also, if you could, please test against
the latest development version of Ubuntu, since this
We're closing this bug since it is has been some time with no response from the
original reporter. However, if the issue still exists please feel free to
reopen with the requested information. Also, if you could, please test against
the latest development version of Ubuntu, since this
We're closing this bug since it is has been some time with no response from the
original reporter. However, if the issue still exists please feel free to
reopen with the requested information. Also, if you could, please test against
the latest development version of Ubuntu, since this
Still segfaults all the way up to kernel .32 (from .25), on fully
updated virtual machines.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659422
Title:
Boot failure after upgrading kernel to
We're closing this bug since it is has been some time with no response from the
original reporter. However, if the issue still exists please feel free to
reopen with the requested information. Also, if you could, please test against
the latest development version of Ubuntu, since this
Same here.
Ubuntu 10.04.
Graphic card: EN210 SILENT/DI/1GD2(LP)
[mi] EQ overflowing. The server is probably stuck in an infinite loop.
Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x28) [0x45fcc8]
1: /usr/bin/X (mieqEnqueue+0x1f4) [0x45b344]
2: /usr/bin/X (xf86PostMotionEventP+0xc4) [0x487564]
3:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: initramfs-tools
initramfs-tools failed to install
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: initramfs-tools 0.92bubuntu78
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-23.75-generic
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-23-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788622
Title:
package initramfs-tools 0.92bubuntu78 failed to install/upgrade:
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
All information given.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788181
Title:
Keyboard freeze after random amount of time
--
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, your crash report is either missing or
challenging to deal with as a .crash file. Please follow these
instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can
be dealt with by the automatic
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, your crash report is either missing or
challenging to deal with as a .crash file. Please follow these
instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can
be dealt with by the automatic
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, your crash report is either missing or
challenging to deal with as a .crash file. Please follow these
instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can
be dealt with by the automatic
with which version of Ubuntu? does the same happens with Metacity ?
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, your crash report is either missing or
challenging to deal with as a .crash file. Please follow these
instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can
be dealt with by the automatic
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, your crash report is either missing or
challenging to deal with as a .crash file. Please follow these
instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can
be dealt with by the automatic
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, your crash report is either missing or
challenging to deal with as a .crash file. Please follow these
instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can
be dealt with by the automatic
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, your crash report is either missing or
challenging to deal with as a .crash file. Please follow these
instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can
be dealt with by the automatic
Another me too; I upgraded from 10.10 to 11.04 and my card is : nVidia
Corporation NV44A [GeForce 6200] (rev a1)
Additional Drivers offers me two options; both exhibit the same
activated but not currently in use behaviour:
NVIDIA accelerated graphics driver (version 173)
NVIDIA accelerated
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, your crash report is either missing or
challenging to deal with as a .crash file. Please follow these
instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can
be dealt with by the automatic
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, your crash report is either missing or
challenging to deal with as a .crash file. Please follow these
instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can
be dealt with by the automatic
** Changed in: unity
Milestone: 3.8.14 = None
** Changed in: nux
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: unity
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: nux (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status:
http://open.eucalyptus.com/wiki/esa-02
** Visibility changed to: Public
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: New = Fix Released
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu Maverick)
Status: In Progress = Fix
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
karmic is EOL
** Also affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Maverick)
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Success!!!
I've just tested the kernels provided by Stefan and they solve the
problem :)
The test I made was:
* Installed a new Ubuntu 10.04.2 VM (net install) with two vCPUs
* Tried to migrate the VM to another Xenserver and confirmed it crashed
* Downloaded and installed the generic-pae
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663776
Title:
[dash] Search field in Unity can not support iBus
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 410131
E:Encountered a section with no Package: header, E:Problem with MergeList
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 410131
E:Encountered a section with no Package: header, E:Problem with MergeList
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346386 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346386
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346386
Update fails with invalid package files with Encountered a section with no
Package: header
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
801 - 900 of 2522 matches
Mail list logo
