[Bug 1352255] Re: Impossible to configure network interface with only IPv6 address

2014-08-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
The workaround for now is to configure an IPv4 address: auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 169.254.199.199 netmask 255.255.0.0 iface eth0 inet6 static address 2001:610:188:444::55 netmask 64 gateway 2001:610:188:444::1 autoconf 0 prive

[Bug 1352255] [NEW] Impossible to configure network interface with only IPv6 address

2014-08-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: As it says on the tin. I'm unable to configure my Ubuntu 14.04 VM to have only an IPv6 address on boot-up. Dual stack works fine. My /etc/networking/interfaces looks like this: # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate them.

[Bug 1252027] Re: package openjdk-7-jre-headless 7u25-2.3.10-1ubuntu0.12.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/java-7-openjdk/swing.properties' is not in sync with other instances of the sam

2014-01-30 Thread /usr/local/dick
I removed all of the opendk-7 stuff and installed the openjdk-6 equivalents. My app (Wowza streaming media server) was able to use that fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1252027 Titl

[Bug 1252027] Re: package openjdk-7-jre-headless 7u25-2.3.10-1ubuntu0.12.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/java-7-openjdk/swing.properties' is not in sync with other instances of the sam

2014-01-27 Thread /usr/local/dick
My java install is also b0rked by this, see attached upgrade log. ** Attachment added: "unattended-upgrades-dpkg_2014-01-24_06%3A48%3A07.197392.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-7/+bug/1252027/+attachment/3958784/+files/unattended-upgrades-dpkg_2014-01-24_06%253A48%253A0

[Bug 1094073] Re: Tinyproxy won't listen to IPv6 and IPv4 at the same time

2013-01-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
It seems tinyproxy does listen to both protocols, I didn't test properly. I assumed that this result: netstat -tlnpvw | grep tinyproxy tcp6 0 0 ::: :::*LISTEN 3946/tinyproxy meant that it didn't listen on v4... but I was wrong. Listen ::

[Bug 1094073] Re: Tinyproxy won't listen to IPv6 and IPv4 at the same time

2013-01-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
** Changed in: tinyproxy (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094073 Title: Tinyproxy won't listen to IPv6 and IPv4 at the same time To manage notif

[Bug 1094073] [NEW] Tinyproxy won't listen to IPv6 and IPv4 at the same time

2012-12-27 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: I'm trying to set up Tinyproxy on a 64-bit Ubuntu 12.04 server system, and I'm using the packaged version 1.8.3. The system has fully working dual stack network connectivity. According to the inline docs in the configuration file /etc/tinyproxy.conf: # Listen: If you have mu

[Bug 1029361] [NEW] 'attempts' DNS option has no effect

2012-07-26 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: >From man(8) resolvconf: /etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/tail File to be appended to the dynamically generated resolver con‐ figuration file. To append nothing, make this an empty file. This file is a good place to put a r

[Bug 998223] Re: Turns on IPv6 privacy extensions regardless of settings in 10-ipv6-privacy.conf

2012-06-11 Thread /usr/local/dick
The same applies to Ubuntu 12.04 server. Despite what interfaces(5) says: privext int Privacy extensions (RFC3041) (0=off, 1=assign, 2=prefer) That statement does not seem to get honoured. This entry in /etc/nework/interfaces worked fine at least in beta2, but n

[Bug 978037] Re: Impossible to configure static IPv6 address

2012-04-10 Thread /usr/local/dick
Wasn't a bug, but merely a RTFM. ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978037 Title: Impossible to configure sta

[Bug 978037] Re: Impossible to configure static IPv6 address

2012-04-10 Thread /usr/local/dick
This indeed was a case of RTFM. However, according to the default /etc/network/interfaces: # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). But interfaces(5) does not tell you the whole story. The part ab

[Bug 978037] [NEW] Impossible to configure static IPv6 address

2012-04-10 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Our 10.04 machines have this in /etc/network/interfaces: auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.87.30.54 netmask 255.255.255.192 gateway 192.87.30.1 iface eth0 inet6 static pre-up echo 0 >

[Bug 567821] Re: data directory (distros.ini) is missing

2011-08-30 Thread /usr/local/dick
Great to have it fixed in natty, but the package in lucid is still b0rked... Any reason why it was never fixed? Thanks!! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567821 Title: data directory (d

[Bug 776642] Re: segfaults from 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.15

2011-05-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
I just went back the the previous version. Since I remove packages from /var/cache/apt after update, I had to dig them up online, from: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+archive/ppa/+buildjob/2165886 I downloaded these and installed them manually with dpkg: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-s

[Bug 776642] Re: segfaults from 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.15

2011-05-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
Hi I just ran into this bug. In hindsight a serious issue that started 3 days ago with one of our web apps seems to also be caused by this. Just tested Steve's patched packages (5.2.4-2ubuntu5.17~lp776642) on our dev server and I can confirm they fix the problems for us. Eagerly awaiting officia

[Bug 715152] Re: [SRU] ntp wont run on IPv6 only host unless lo has 127.0.0.1 address

2011-04-20 Thread /usr/local/dick
Just installed "ntp 1:4.2.4p8+dfsg-1ubuntu2.1" from lucid-proposed, and that seems to do the trick. Thanks for fixing this guys! And well in advance of 6-6, IPv6 day ;-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

[Bug 713002] Re: Impossible to disable IPv4

2011-03-08 Thread /usr/local/dick
new version in hardy-proposed 1:4.7p1-8ubuntu3 also works FINE. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002 Title: Impossible to disable IPv4 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.

[Bug 729181] Re: Can't connect to IPv6 LDAP servers

2011-03-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
** Description changed: Binary package hint: smbldap-tools - Connecting to IPv6 LDAP servers gives "erreur LDAP: Can't contact master - ldap server for writing (IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connection refused) - at /usr/share/perl5/smbldap_tools.pm line 322." + Connecting to IPv6-only LDAP serv

[Bug 729181] Re: Can't connect to IPv6 LDAP servers

2011-03-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
** Description changed: Binary package hint: smbldap-tools Connecting to IPv6 LDAP servers gives "erreur LDAP: Can't contact master ldap server for writing (IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connection refused) at /usr/share/perl5/smbldap_tools.pm line 322." Net::LDAP in Lucid does suppor

[Bug 729181] [NEW] Can't connect to IPv6 LDAP servers

2011-03-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: smbldap-tools Connecting to IPv6 LDAP servers gives "erreur LDAP: Can't contact master ldap server for writing (IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connection refused) at /usr/share/perl5/smbldap_tools.pm line 322." Net::LDAP in Lucid does support IPv6. However t

[Bug 713002] Re: Impossible to disable IPv4

2011-03-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
Should I test again? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002 Title: Impossible to disable IPv4 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman

[Bug 727114] [NEW] nmap only recognizes IPv6 resolvers by specifying "--system-dns"

2011-03-01 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nmap I recently configured our 10.04 LTS systems to use only IPv6 resolvers: root@cajones:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf nameserver 2001:610:148:dead::4 nameserver 2001:610:158:98d::42 domain terena.org nmap complains since: root@cajones:~# nmap -sP putin.ter

[Bug 713002] Re: Impossible to disable IPv4

2011-02-11 Thread /usr/local/dick
Pakcage from hardy-proposed works FINE. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002 Title: Impossible to disable IPv4 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com http

[Bug 715152] Re: ntp wont run on IPv6 only host unless lo has 127.0.0.1 address

2011-02-11 Thread /usr/local/dick
Ehm, well exactly like you did, I manually removed it, although it's done automatically from interfaces with 'pre-up'. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715152 Title: ntp wont run on IPv

[Bug 715152] [NEW] ntp wont run on IPv6 only host unless lo has 127.0.0.1 address

2011-02-08 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ntp Lucid host running IPv6 only, with network configured like this: root@svn:~# ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:56:86:00:15 inet6 addr: 2001:610:148:dead:cafe:babe:0:29/64 Scope:Global inet6 addr: fe80::250:56ff:

[Bug 715141] [NEW] ntp.ubuntu.com does not have AAAA record

2011-02-08 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ntp When installing ntp on an IPv6 only host, the kindly provided ntp.ubuntu.com does not work, because it does not have a record. Please provide IPv6 connectivity for this host. This affects all releases. ** Affects: ntp (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Bug 241305] Re: security.ubuntu.com not accessible in IPv6 (AAAA record missing in the DNS)

2011-02-07 Thread /usr/local/dick
It is now February 2011 and still no IPv6 connectivity for security.ubuntu.com. For instance my code repository system svn.terena.org is complaining. I am planning to remove IPv4 from more systems, so +1 for some IPv6 connectivity. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Bug 713002] Re: Impossible to disable IPv4

2011-02-05 Thread /usr/local/dick
Confirmed, the patched version works as expected, both options actually work! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002 Title: Impossible to disable IPv4 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubun

[Bug 697545] [NEW] Backslashes from check_disk_smb output are removed in web interface

2011-01-05 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nagios3 One of my hosts has this check running against it, with result: nag...@expat:~$ /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_disk_smb -a grizzly.terena.org -H 'SAMBA' -s profile_backup -u nagios3 -p hackme -w 95 -c 99 Disk ok - 2.32G (14%) free on \\SAMBA\prof

[Bug 694707] [NEW] database doesn't get purged during purge

2010-12-27 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: When documenting the installation of slapd on Lucid, I often need to go back to a clean default install. I do this by: apt-get -y purge slapd && apt-get install slapd It seems that purging does not remove /var/lib/ldap, so after re- installation old database stuff is hanging

[Bug 611644] Re: Snapshot with quiesce option fails and kills VM on ESXi 4.1

2010-08-16 Thread /usr/local/dick
Correction: copying modules does not work anymore on the latest kernel. -- Snapshot with quiesce option fails and kills VM on ESXi 4.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611644 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 611644] Re: Snapshot with quiesce option fails and kills VM on ESXi 4.1

2010-07-30 Thread /usr/local/dick
FYI, it might be totally bad practise, but I just copied the kernel modules from the host that has the official tar installer, to the host with Ubuntu open-vm-tools (essentially replacing /lib/modules/2.6.32-24-server/updates/dkms/*.ko ), and after rebooting everything seems to work fine, i.e. I wa

[Bug 611644] [NEW] Snapshot with quiesce option fails and kills VM on ESXi 4.1

2010-07-30 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: open-vm-tools I recently upgraded from ESX4u2 to ESX4.1, and since then snapshots of Lucid VMs go wrong. This surfaced because we use VCB to make backups of our VMs, and this process includes making a quiesced snapshot. Done manually from the ESX console

[Bug 418527] Re: Unnecessary dependencies in open-vm-tools

2010-04-02 Thread /usr/local/dick
Thanks, I already found out this was the case. I was a bit confused because the default did not work right away. On a clean system apt-get install --no-install-recommends linux-headers-`uname -r` open- vm-dkms open-vm-tools does the trick and everything seems to work just fine - the linux- header

[Bug 418527] Re: Unnecessary dependencies in open-vm-tools

2010-04-01 Thread /usr/local/dick
Dependencies are still there in 2010.02.23-236320-1+ubuntu1. This will severely impact usability on all ESX systems...please fix so that this LTS will have non-crappy tools.. thanks -- Unnecessary dependencies in open-vm-tools https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418527 You received this bug notifica

[Bug 553336] [NEW] server installer installs x11

2010-04-01 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debian-installer Installing Lucid beta1 server, I selected only OpenSSH-server as feature. After installation it has installed all the X11 stuff as well. Tried again without selecting anything, still leads to X11 being installed... ** Affects: debian-ins

[Bug 418527] Re: Unnecessary dependencies in open-vm-tools

2010-03-20 Thread /usr/local/dick
Installing lucid beta1 today, 2009.11.16-210370-1+ubuntu2 seems to still want to install the entire X forest: r...@lucid-beta1:~# apt-get install open-vm-tools Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following extra packages will be installed:

[Bug 468566] [NEW] Plugins in subdirectories are not loaded

2009-11-01 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: open-vm-tools On a new Karmic server, after compiling modules with m-a, open-vm-tools works (i.e. Tools are "OK" in VMware VirtualCenter), but fails to report the IP address and host name. I turned on logging, and I see this: r...@karmic-test:/etc/vmwar

[Bug 278711] Re: open-vm-source doesn't build

2008-11-01 Thread /usr/local/dick
cd /us/src tar xvfj open-vm.tar.bz2 perl -pi -e 's/#include\ //g' $(find /usr/src/modules/open-vm) rm open-vm.tar.bz2 tar cvfj open-vm.tar.bz2 modules Now the module do compile -- open-vm-source doesn't build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278711 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 244272] [NEW] ipv6 netfilter modules not available

2008-06-30 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: After installation of Ubuntu Hardy JeOS and using the linux-image-virtual kernel, the ipv6 netfilter modules are not installed. On other Hardy systems (for instance that run linux-image-2.6.24-19-powerpc, and linux-image-2.6.24-16-server) I have the directory: /lib/modules

[Bug 209410] [NEW] installer goes to sleep / activates screen saver

2008-03-30 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gfxboot-theme-ubuntu When using the graphical installer of Hardy beta, the screensaver kicks in when it's halfway installing all the packages. If you didn't notice this and look back at the screen you might think that the installer had crashed because t

Re: [Bug 73665] Re: Edgy installer on iBook G3/500 crashes when date is 1904

2006-11-28 Thread /usr/local/dick
sam tygier wrote: > related to Bug #23426 > > maybe both could be fixed if when the hardware clock is read, the date > is forced to be after 1970. > looks like a relation indeed. sorry for not checking for past bugs, i just followed the advice in the text that was onscreen while the crash happ

[Bug 73665] Edgy installer on iBook G3/500 crashes when date is 1904

2006-11-28 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: After maintenance and incidently resetting the bios clock to zero, which appreantly is the year 1904 on an iBook, the Xubuntu Edgy installer crashes. After setting the date to a proper value (28 Nov 2006) the install works fine. Here is the captured output of syslog on the cr