The workaround for now is to configure an IPv4 address:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 169.254.199.199
netmask 255.255.0.0
iface eth0 inet6 static
address 2001:610:188:444::55
netmask 64
gateway 2001:610:188:444::1
autoconf 0
prive
Public bug reported:
As it says on the tin.
I'm unable to configure my Ubuntu 14.04 VM to have only an IPv6 address on
boot-up.
Dual stack works fine.
My /etc/networking/interfaces looks like this:
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# and how to activate them.
I removed all of the opendk-7 stuff and installed the openjdk-6 equivalents.
My app (Wowza streaming media server) was able to use that fine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1252027
Titl
My java install is also b0rked by this, see attached upgrade log.
** Attachment added:
"unattended-upgrades-dpkg_2014-01-24_06%3A48%3A07.197392.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-7/+bug/1252027/+attachment/3958784/+files/unattended-upgrades-dpkg_2014-01-24_06%253A48%253A0
It seems tinyproxy does listen to both protocols, I didn't test properly.
I assumed that this result:
netstat -tlnpvw | grep tinyproxy
tcp6 0 0 ::: :::*LISTEN
3946/tinyproxy
meant that it didn't listen on v4... but I was wrong.
Listen ::
** Changed in: tinyproxy (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094073
Title:
Tinyproxy won't listen to IPv6 and IPv4 at the same time
To manage notif
Public bug reported:
I'm trying to set up Tinyproxy on a 64-bit Ubuntu 12.04 server system, and I'm
using the packaged version 1.8.3.
The system has fully working dual stack network connectivity.
According to the inline docs in the configuration file /etc/tinyproxy.conf:
# Listen: If you have mu
Public bug reported:
>From man(8) resolvconf:
/etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/tail
File to be appended to the dynamically generated resolver con‐
figuration file. To append nothing, make this an empty file.
This file is a good place to put a r
The same applies to Ubuntu 12.04 server.
Despite what interfaces(5) says:
privext int
Privacy extensions (RFC3041) (0=off, 1=assign, 2=prefer)
That statement does not seem to get honoured.
This entry in /etc/nework/interfaces worked fine at least in beta2, but n
Wasn't a bug, but merely a RTFM.
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978037
Title:
Impossible to configure sta
This indeed was a case of RTFM.
However, according to the default /etc/network/interfaces:
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5).
But interfaces(5) does not tell you the whole story.
The part ab
Public bug reported:
Our 10.04 machines have this in /etc/network/interfaces:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
# The primary network interface
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.87.30.54
netmask 255.255.255.192
gateway 192.87.30.1
iface eth0 inet6 static
pre-up echo 0 >
Great to have it fixed in natty, but the package in lucid is still b0rked...
Any reason why it was never fixed?
Thanks!!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567821
Title:
data directory (d
I just went back the the previous version.
Since I remove packages from /var/cache/apt after update, I had to dig them up
online, from:
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+archive/ppa/+buildjob/2165886
I downloaded these and installed them manually with dpkg:
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-s
Hi
I just ran into this bug. In hindsight a serious issue that started 3 days ago
with one of our web apps seems to also be caused by this.
Just tested Steve's patched packages (5.2.4-2ubuntu5.17~lp776642) on our dev
server and I can confirm they fix the problems for us.
Eagerly awaiting officia
Just installed "ntp 1:4.2.4p8+dfsg-1ubuntu2.1" from lucid-proposed, and that
seems to do the trick.
Thanks for fixing this guys!
And well in advance of 6-6, IPv6 day ;-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
new version in hardy-proposed 1:4.7p1-8ubuntu3 also works FINE.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002
Title:
Impossible to disable IPv4
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: smbldap-tools
- Connecting to IPv6 LDAP servers gives "erreur LDAP: Can't contact master
- ldap server for writing (IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connection refused)
- at /usr/share/perl5/smbldap_tools.pm line 322."
+ Connecting to IPv6-only LDAP serv
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: smbldap-tools
Connecting to IPv6 LDAP servers gives "erreur LDAP: Can't contact master
ldap server for writing (IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connection refused)
at /usr/share/perl5/smbldap_tools.pm line 322."
Net::LDAP in Lucid does suppor
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: smbldap-tools
Connecting to IPv6 LDAP servers gives "erreur LDAP: Can't contact master
ldap server for writing (IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connection refused)
at /usr/share/perl5/smbldap_tools.pm line 322."
Net::LDAP in Lucid does support IPv6. However t
Should I test again?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002
Title:
Impossible to disable IPv4
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nmap
I recently configured our 10.04 LTS systems to use only IPv6 resolvers:
root@cajones:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 2001:610:148:dead::4
nameserver 2001:610:158:98d::42
domain terena.org
nmap complains since:
root@cajones:~# nmap -sP putin.ter
Pakcage from hardy-proposed works FINE.
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002
Title:
Impossible to disable IPv4
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
Ehm, well exactly like you did, I manually removed it, although it's
done automatically from interfaces with 'pre-up'.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715152
Title:
ntp wont run on IPv
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ntp
Lucid host running IPv6 only, with network configured like this:
root@svn:~# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:56:86:00:15
inet6 addr: 2001:610:148:dead:cafe:babe:0:29/64 Scope:Global
inet6 addr: fe80::250:56ff:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ntp
When installing ntp on an IPv6 only host, the kindly provided ntp.ubuntu.com
does not work, because it does not have a record.
Please provide IPv6 connectivity for this host.
This affects all releases.
** Affects: ntp (Ubuntu)
Importance:
It is now February 2011 and still no IPv6 connectivity for security.ubuntu.com.
For instance my code repository system svn.terena.org is complaining.
I am planning to remove IPv4 from more systems, so +1 for some IPv6
connectivity.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
Confirmed, the patched version works as expected, both options actually
work!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002
Title:
Impossible to disable IPv4
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nagios3
One of my hosts has this check running against it, with result:
nag...@expat:~$ /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_disk_smb -a grizzly.terena.org -H
'SAMBA' -s profile_backup -u nagios3 -p hackme -w 95 -c 99
Disk ok - 2.32G (14%) free on \\SAMBA\prof
Public bug reported:
When documenting the installation of slapd on Lucid, I often need to go back to
a clean default install. I do this by:
apt-get -y purge slapd && apt-get install slapd
It seems that purging does not remove /var/lib/ldap, so after re-
installation old database stuff is hanging
Correction: copying modules does not work anymore on the latest kernel.
--
Snapshot with quiesce option fails and kills VM on ESXi 4.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611644
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
FYI, it might be totally bad practise, but I just copied the kernel
modules from the host that has the official tar installer, to the host
with Ubuntu open-vm-tools (essentially replacing
/lib/modules/2.6.32-24-server/updates/dkms/*.ko ), and after rebooting
everything seems to work fine, i.e. I wa
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: open-vm-tools
I recently upgraded from ESX4u2 to ESX4.1, and since then snapshots of
Lucid VMs go wrong. This surfaced because we use VCB to make backups of
our VMs, and this process includes making a quiesced snapshot. Done
manually from the ESX console
Thanks, I already found out this was the case.
I was a bit confused because the default did not work right away.
On a clean system
apt-get install --no-install-recommends linux-headers-`uname -r` open-
vm-dkms open-vm-tools
does the trick and everything seems to work just fine - the linux-
header
Dependencies are still there in 2010.02.23-236320-1+ubuntu1.
This will severely impact usability on all ESX systems...please fix so that
this LTS will have non-crappy tools.. thanks
--
Unnecessary dependencies in open-vm-tools
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418527
You received this bug notifica
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: debian-installer
Installing Lucid beta1 server, I selected only OpenSSH-server as feature.
After installation it has installed all the X11 stuff as well.
Tried again without selecting anything, still leads to X11 being installed...
** Affects: debian-ins
Installing lucid beta1 today, 2009.11.16-210370-1+ubuntu2 seems to still
want to install the entire X forest:
r...@lucid-beta1:~# apt-get install open-vm-tools
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: open-vm-tools
On a new Karmic server, after compiling modules with m-a, open-vm-tools
works (i.e. Tools are "OK" in VMware VirtualCenter), but fails to report
the IP address and host name.
I turned on logging, and I see this:
r...@karmic-test:/etc/vmwar
cd /us/src
tar xvfj open-vm.tar.bz2
perl -pi -e 's/#include\ //g' $(find /usr/src/modules/open-vm)
rm open-vm.tar.bz2
tar cvfj open-vm.tar.bz2 modules
Now the module do compile
--
open-vm-source doesn't build
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278711
You received this bug notification because you
Public bug reported:
After installation of Ubuntu Hardy JeOS and using the linux-image-virtual
kernel, the ipv6 netfilter modules are not installed.
On other Hardy systems (for instance that run linux-image-2.6.24-19-powerpc,
and linux-image-2.6.24-16-server) I have the directory:
/lib/modules
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gfxboot-theme-ubuntu
When using the graphical installer of Hardy beta, the screensaver kicks in when
it's halfway installing all the packages. If you didn't notice this and look
back at the screen you might think that the installer had crashed because t
sam tygier wrote:
> related to Bug #23426
>
> maybe both could be fixed if when the hardware clock is read, the date
> is forced to be after 1970.
>
looks like a relation indeed.
sorry for not checking for past bugs, i just followed the advice in the text
that was
onscreen while the crash happ
Public bug reported:
After maintenance and incidently resetting the bios clock to zero, which
appreantly is the year 1904 on an iBook, the Xubuntu Edgy installer crashes.
After setting the date to a proper value (28 Nov 2006) the install works fine.
Here is the captured output of syslog on the cr
43 matches
Mail list logo