[Bug 545854] Re: Pulseaudio should be easier to disable

Just like the many people who tried to uninstall PA, I too consider PA as a trouble maker. Examples are as gross as opening a second session and having no sound in it. Pulseaudio should be optional, made for those who run one session and one sound program at a time and require sound features pert

Re: [Bug 228988] Re: Firefox can display a page with the wrong encoding

On 2010-10-31 12:58, papukaija wrote : > Is this upstream bug enough similar to this bug?: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253575 > > If, not there are few more encoding related bugs at > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=254868 but none of those > really is the same tha

[Bug 228988] Re: Firefox can display a page with the wrong default encoding

Thanks for your response. On 2010-10-31 12:26, papukaija wrote : > According to LP, this bug is affecting 1 person (as seen on the top of > this bug report). That's one reason for this bug for not being marked as > confirmed. Please understand the meaning of the word shudder. You seem not to ha

[Bug 669141] Re: Check spelling in more than one language, or rather dictionaries

** Summary changed: - Spelling in more than one language, or rather dictionaries + Check spelling in more than one language, or rather dictionaries -- Check spelling in more than one language, or rather dictionaries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669141 You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 662840] Re: Spell checking more than one language in Firefox

I flagged your report as "affecting me". I had a similar report of mine ready to post but it's different enough for being a separate Bug #669141. Yours affects only Firefox and mine all spelling-checking applications. It may bring you some light. I have a question for you. What is/was the procedu

[Bug 669141] Re: Spelling in more than one language, or rather dictionaries

See also Bug #662840, similar but different. -- Spelling in more than one language, or rather dictionaries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@li

[Bug 669141] [NEW] Spelling in more than one language, or rather dictionaries

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: hunspell Ubuntu 10.04 up to date. This problem also concerns programs using hunspell, but there may be a solution within hunspell alone, see below. 1. What you expect to happen The same as what happens, but without the stated inconveniences 2. What a

[Bug 228988] Re: Firefox can display a page with the wrong default encoding

** Description changed: - Since I'm using it, I see Firefox (2.X and 3.0bX) sometimes display - pages using the wrong character encoding. Sometime a page will display + Since I'm using it, I see Firefox (2.X and 3.X) sometimes display pages + using the wrong character encoding. Sometime a page wil

[Bug 228988] Re: Firefox can display a page with the wrong default encoding

** Summary changed: - Firefox can display a page with the wrong encoding + Firefox can display a page with the wrong default encoding -- Firefox can display a page with the wrong default encoding https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228988 You received this bug notification because you are a member o

Re: [Bug 228988] Re: Firefox can display a page with the wrong encoding

> In addition, this bug is only affecting one person. That's why you > should give another URL to test. How do you know? How many persons did you ask? I asked 10 friends to test that URL. 6 shuddered. I told you that's what people usually do (only those who see characters to shudder at). 4 answ

Re: [Bug 228988] Re: Firefox can display a page with the wrong encoding

On 2010-10-01 21:01, papukaija wrote : > The URL in comment 53 goes to blank and black page which is useless to > triage this bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22898 The complete procedure to have a chance to reproduce this case is to visit http://www.operaliege.be, start buying a ticket and

Re: [Bug 228988] Bad pages

папская, if your hobby is checking Web pages, look at this one from Ubuntu: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/dapper/man4/hunspell.4.html Do you understand what's wrong? I told you most people are shuddering about character set issues. -- Firefox can display a page with the wrong encoding ht

Re: [Bug 538600] Re: Various bad Monitor resolutions after installation r monitor change

This is a well-known issue with monitors that do not notify their size through cable signals. Either the installed resolution is set to 800×600 and the user does not know how to get it higher because System/Preferences/Monitor.../Resolution has no appropriate setting, Or, as in the case I describe

[Bug 202456] Re: Gnome wine runs programs without minimize button and with type-through

After 2½ year waiting, nothing happened, except being set to low priority, to a bug that prevented my packaging applications to Wine. This is what I just wrote to http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2841 - Now running Ubuntu 10.04 (Gnome) and Wine 1.2 with "decorate" and "control" windows s

[Bug 434351] Re: gnome-language selector is labyrinthine

** Description changed: Binary package hint: language-selector As of 09.10 Karmic ... An ample list of installed languages is awkward to determine in gnome-language-selector. (browsing through a long list, missing, and risking to forget the beginning as you reach the end ) If

Re: [Bug 434351] Re: gnome-language selector is labyrinthine

I just thought that, more easily than I sketched it, one could use the well-known two-columns installed/available language lists between which you switch them. The code to do that may be readily available in a lib. -- gnome-language selector is labyrinthine https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434351

Re: [Bug 429102] Re: [i945gm] Huge font size in KDE and GDM. Makes KDE unusable

On 2010-10-01 12:01, papukaija wrote : > Please bear in mind that bug's statuses and general control is described > at wiki.ubuntu.com and this bug is fully in accordance with those > guidelines. > I don't have time to read wiki.ubuntu.com. But please tell the person who wrote it that if the re

Re: [Bug 228988] Re: Firefox can display a page with the wrong encoding

On 2010-10-01 12:06, papukaija wrote : > The URL goes to blank and black page... Did you use wget to download the > file from the server? If yes, then it means that the file is encoded > with iso-8859-1 and therefore should be displayed in FF with that > encoding. I saved the page, which is the be

Re: [Bug 228988] Another case

Occurred while buying concert tickets, well, trying to. https://www.rodrigue.fr/transact/venteenligne.asp?WCI=Panier_Reserver Screenshot and page's source attached. The codepage used MUST be ISO8859-1 and is UTF-8. After I stored this page in a file, IT WAS ISO8859-1 correctly displayed Such a stor

Re: [Bug 429102] Re: [i945gm] Huge font size in KDE and GDM. Makes KDE unusable

> We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need > to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments. > You shouldn't wait until the information is no longer available to "investigate the problem". Else, you're making our bug reporting very inefficient a

Re: [Bug 228988] Re: Firefox can display a page with the wrong encoding

On 2010-09-16 18:43, papukaija wrote : > The files (of the atil site) are stored on the server with ISO-8859-1 > encoding (tested with wget) which is not recommended in Linux servers. That is no reason for FF displaying the default character set (ISO-8859-1) incorrectly. FYI, the atlif's server is

Re: [Bug 55270] Java double click

I'm very surprised - to have just met a double click not working / speed problem making Java unusable - to discover that that this problem was reported 4 years ago - to read comment 1 saying that the bug has already been reported but without saying where - to read comment 2 denying comment 1 and la

[Bug 30201] Re: Return Receipt's prompt before allowing the mail to be read.

> The milestone reflects the upstream bug that it's set for. The > current upstream bug was fixed for 3.1. Your description that you > updated can serve as that documentation. > May I repeat that that "upstream bug fix" is not a fix of Bug 30201 because a fix that doesn't fix a problem is not

[Bug 30201] Re: Return Receipt's prompt before allowing the mail to be read.

151244 fix is wrong and unusable (endlessly requests already sent receipts) -- Return Receipt's prompt before allowing the mail to be read. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-b

Re: [Bug 228988] Another URL

On 2010-09-16 18:43, papukaija wrote : > As I and John in comment 28 asked, an other URL (to another site > reproducing this issue) is necessary to fix this issue. That is why in comment 30 I was glad to mention a procedure I could repeat at will. It was not repeatable before and when I tried to

Re: [Bug 228988] Windows test

I happened to launch VirtualBox to run Windows XP. FYI, Here are the windowshots of the test case. Windows_XP-Firefox_3.6.10 Windows_XP-Internet_Explorer_6.0.2900.5512.xpsp.080413-2111.png As I know I will be accused to have tweaked those systems, I reply in advance that it is not true. I use the

Re: [Bug 30201] Re: Return Receipt's prompt before allowing the mail to be read.

Thanks for your quick reply. > Please report any other issues you may find I did: please update the milestone to 1.1.1 one way or another so that it be not misleading. The purpose of Launchpad should be not only that Ubuntu users help Canonical to make good packaging choices and to praise the bene

Re: [Bug 30201] Re: Return Receipt's prompt before allowing the mail to be read.

Please update the milestone to 3.1.1 (possibly adding the second Mozilla bug) There is a second Mozilla bug preventing this solution. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151244#c42 See my Description update. -- Return Receipt's prompt before allowing the mail to be read. https://bugs

[Bug 30201] Re: Return Receipt's prompt before allowing the mail to be read.

** Description changed: In Dapper Current $ apt-cache policy mozilla-thunderbird mozilla-thunderbird:   Installed: 1.5-0ubuntu3 Thunderbird will prompt a user to acknowledge an email as read when it contains a "Return-Receipt-To" header, before the message is visible in the previe

[Bug 30201] Re: Return Receipt's prompt before allowing the mail to be read.

** Description changed: In Dapper Current $ apt-cache policy mozilla-thunderbird mozilla-thunderbird: - Installed: 1.5-0ubuntu3 +   Installed: 1.5-0ubuntu3 Thunderbird will prompt a user to acknowledge an email as read when it contains a "Return-Receipt-To" header, before the messag

Re: [Bug 429102] Re: [i945gm] Huge font size in KDE and GDM. Makes KDE unusable

On 2010-09-16 18:53, papukaija wrote : > There's a contact user link in everybody's LP overview page (the link > points to https://launchpad.net/~username/+contactuser ), so there's not > even a need to post anything publicly but as stated on the contact page, > the message's receiver will get the

Re: [Bug 228988] Re: Firefox can display a page with the wrong encoding

On 2010-09-16 13:24, papukaija wrote : > You wrote "I'm sorry I don't run Maverick. Nor Lucid yet. Please note > that these problems are browser issue, not system issues." Of course > this bug is a browser issue but Lucid and Maverick have newer versions > of Firefox than Hardy or Jaunty has. Anyw

Re: [Bug 429102] Re: [i945gm] Huge font size in KDE and GDM. Makes KDE unusable

On 2010-09-16 13:44, papukaija wrote : > That's quite difficult without the owner's contact details... > ... which I obviously cannot post on this public list. Constructively, if you tell me you do read 429102 at bugs ... I can send a contact-making private e-mail to both. -- [i945gm] Huge font

Re: [Bug 228988] Re: Firefox can display a page with the wrong encoding

On 2010-09-16 13:39, papukaija wrote : > "I described it before and 1 more h making the same report for Lucid > as I did before" > -> Does that mean that you reported a new bug? No, it means that comment 40 is the same as comment 24 but in (much) greater detail. Regarding the comment in 24 about

Re: [Bug 228988] Re: Firefox can display a page with the wrong encoding

On 2010-09-16 02:30, André Pirard wrote : > ... but the tooltip continues to hide the list and that's a 2½ year old > problem too. I see that you have been tracking this Bug #67 ... Is it a result of this remark that the priority of this 2½ year old bug has just been set to low?

Re: [Bug 228988] Re: Firefox can display a page with the wrong encoding

On 2010-09-15 22:38, papukaija wrote : > I'm a bit confused, you wrote "In particular, I explained > that the character set should be described within the HTML file > exclusively." while your given URL doesn't have any meta tags in its > header Please understand that "exclusively" in the phrase yo

Re: [Bug 228988] Re: Firefox can display a page with the wrong encoding

On 2010-09-15 22:38, papukaija wrote : > You were asked in comment 32 to reproduce this bug in the current > development release of Ubuntu which is Maverick. I can't reproduce this > bug in Lucid wit the given URL with UTF-8 encoding. That's why I asked > you in comment 34 to give another URL to t

Re: [Bug 228988] Re: Firefox can display a page with the wrong encoding

** Attachment added: "Screenshot-Mozilla Firefox.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228988/+attachment/1591307/+files/Screenshot-Mozilla%20Firefox.png ** Attachment added: "Screenshot-2.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228988/+attachment/1591308/+files/Screenshot-2.png -- Firefox

Re: [Bug 429102] Re: [i945gm] Huge font size in KDE and GDM. Makes KDE unusable

Please contact the PC's owner directly. -- [i945gm] Huge font size in KDE and GDM. Makes KDE unusable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429102 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.u

Re: [Bug 30201] Re: Return Receipt's prompt before allowing the mail to be read.

Much much better indeed, thanks for this news and to the authors of the patch. Unfortunately, TB 3.1 no longer remembers whether the RR was sent. It requests sending another one each time the e-mail is opened. In general, for many good ideas about e-mail design, look at good old Eudora. Eudora pro

Re: [Bug 30201] Re: Return Receipt's prompt before allowing the mail to be read.

On 2010-09-15 10:21, papukaija wrote : > We'd like to figure out what's causing this bug for you, but we haven't > heard back from you in a while. Could you please provide the requested > information? Thanks! > Who is "you"? What do you mean with "what's causing this bug"? Thunderbird, of cour

Re: [Bug 228988] Re: Firefox can display a page with the wrong encoding

On 2010-09-15 10:31, papukaija wrote : > We'd like to figure out what's causing this bug for you, but we haven't > heard back from you in a while. Could you please provide the requested > information? Thanks! > This bug has been discussed in great length and details and all information was give

Re: [Bug 429102] Re: [i945gm] Huge font size in KDE and GDM. Makes KDE unusable

On 2010-09-15 10:29, papukaija wrote : > We'd like to figure out what's causing this bug for you, but we haven't > heard back from you in a while. Could you please provide the requested > information? Thanks! > > Ps. "You" refers to bug's reporter. > Yes, my reply, about one month ago, is right

Re: [Bug 556933] Re: "Update standard folders" should add language links to folders, not rename them

I wrote I'll do my best to file this to Gnome asap. -- "Update standard folders" should add language links to folders, not rename them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 556933] Re: "Update standard folders" should add language links to folders, not rename them

On 2010-08-27 16:26, papukaija wrote : > I'm sorry if the upstream was missing from comment 10 but in comment 11 > I already was more clear ("Bear in mind that this package is just synced > from Debian. Debian gets the package from upstream."). Anyway, as stated > in comment 13 that the upstream f

Re: [Bug 556933] Re: "Update standard folders" should add language links to folders, not rename them

> If your proposed fix is so easy to make then you might provide us a > patch. That patch needs of course be forwarded to upstream because > this package is imported from Debian * unless you (or someone else) > are ready to provide a patch for every new upstream release. > * As you can see at > htt

Re: [Bug 556933] Re: "Update standard folders" should add language links to folders, not rename them

On 2010-08-25 15:51, papukaija wrote : > "Let us try to be clear. What are you calling a "folder renaming > *issue*"?" > -> You wrote about it in this bug's description "Among other folders, > ~/Desktop is renamed ~/Bureau, but only if it is empty." I was asking what are you calling an *issue*, wh

[Bug 556933] Debian-Bug#594427

It seems I succeeded filing what seems to be Debian-Bug#594427 for this one. -- "Update standard folders" should add language links to folders, not rename them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

Re: [Bug 556933] Re: "Update standard folders" should add language links to folders, not rename them

On 2010-08-25 15:53, papukaija wrote : > "The equivalent of this very simple fix has been tested for 3 years." > Could you please be more specific? Who has tested and where? Am I asking who is your girlfriend (подруга?) and where she lives? ;-) 8 persons for which I installed 8.04 in English and w

Re: [Bug 556933] Re: "Update standard folders" should add language links to folders, not rename them

On 2010-08-25 15:51, papukaija wrote : > -> No, the decision is already made and has to be followed at > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#A%20bug%20that%20should%20be%20handled%20upstream > Can you explain why there are 2 Debian bugs for I'll be trying to file a bug with Debian, but I'

Re: [Bug 357172] Re: pidgin opens unsolicited MSN conversations

It looks like I have lost my time with this. No, sorry, I have no time to make 10.10 tests. I'm doing my best to report bugs as I'm asked to. -- pidgin opens unsolicited MSN conversations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

Re: [Bug 290087] Re: romanian language weird installation

What I saw was unbelievable and hard to understand. I can neither explain more nor repeatthe problem. Moreover, there might have been depot server problems on top. The best you could do is erase this report entirely to avoid user confusion. -- romanian language weird installation https://bugs.lau

Re: [Bug 556933] Re: "Update standard folders" should add language links to folders, not rename them

It seems we're off again to very long discussions to prove the obvious. On 2010-08-23 12:40, papukaija wrote : > There are two issues in this bug report. The first one: folder renaming > issue. Let us try to be clear. What are you calling a "folder renaming *issue*"? There is a "folder having be

[Bug 556933] Re: "Update standard folders" should add language links to folders, not rename them

On 2010-08-22 22:55, papukaija wrote : > As you wish but then the renaming failure will _not be_ fixed because > this bug becomes a feature request/wishlist. Let us recall that you asked if I consider this a bug. I replied YES (I want it to be a bug). That is because the system behaves abnormally.

Re: [Bug 556933] Re: "Update standard folders" should add language links to folders, not rename them

Thanks for taking care. Yes I know that the directory names can be retrieved but also that it neither easy nor done. Symbolic links REALLY ARE the SAFE solution. -- XDG_DESKTOP_DIR (ex. ~/Desktop) isn't renamed to the new language if it isn't empty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556933 You rece

Re: [Bug 556933] Re: XDG_DESKTOP_DIR (ex. ~/Desktop) isn't renamed to the new language if it isn't empty

On 2010-08-22 21:09, papukaija wrote : > ** Summary changed: > > - "Update standard folders" should add language links to folders, not rename > them > + XDG_DESKTOP_DIR (ex. ~/Desktop) isn't renamed to the new language if it > isn't empty > > ** Description changed: > > Binary package hint: xd

Re: [Bug 429102] Re: [i945gm] Huge font size in KDE and GDM. Makes KDE unusable 8.04-9.10.

On 2010-08-22 16:42, papukaija wrote : > If you could test the current Ubuntu development ... Thank you for coming back. I'd do that gladly but I'm afraid the IBMPC I helped returned home one year ago. I may however try to call the owner and see if he remembers and still uses the same PC. If that'

Re: [Bug 556933] Re: "Update standard folders" should add language links to folders, not rename them

On 2010-08-22 16:37, papukaija wrote : > However, you suggest that "Update standard folders" > should add language links to folders, not rename them while the real > issue is that (in your case) ~/Desktop is renamed to ~/Bureau, but only > if it is empty. Do you want to keep this bug as a feature/

Re: [Bug 228988] Re: Firefox can display a page with the wrong encoding

On 2010-08-22 16:08, papukaija wrote : > Thank you for your bug report. To maintain a respectful atmosphere, > please follow the code of conduct - > http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct/ . Your useless comment is not maintaining a respectful atmosphere. Please add to http://www.ubuntu.com/comm

[Bug 533781] Re: [bind9 packaging] DNS no longer works after uninstall

Oops, I just came across a Synaptic Packet Manager : Not installed (residual config) for bind9. Not my habit, that's why I didn't imagine it, but that must explain what happened to me. Setting to invalid. This story can be used as a nice hownotto, though :-) ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu)

[Bug 288461] Re: gimp menus always on top of images

This bug says that GIMP is embarrassing itself by placing the toolbox on top of the image. So bad for itself. Assuming that "the duplicate" is Bug #283115, it tells a slightly different story. It means that GIMP is embarrassing the screen with an unused toobox windows you can't minimize. And this

Re: [Bug 556933] attachments (hopefully)

Here are the screenshot attachments. ** Attachment added: "Desktop-1.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43307484/Desktop-1.png ** Attachment added: "Desktop-2.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43307485/Desktop-2.png ** Attachment added: "Desktop-3.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43

[Bug 556933] [NEW] "Update standard folders" should add language links to folders, not rename them

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xdg-user-dirs This applies to all Ubuntu (Gnome) versions up to 10.04. Note: understand "Bureau" below as the name of any "standard" folder in any language. When a user changes the language of its profile she/he is asked a "funny" question in Desktop-1

Re: [Bug 352689] Re: jaunty beta liveCD resume freezes X on HP 6720 laptop w Intel GM965/GL960

On 2010-03-19 02:27, David Tombs wrote : > André, > > Your reply was not helpful. If you'd like to help, please attach the > requested information or let us know you no longer have the hardware so > we can close the report. Apport will let you examine the report > information before sending so you

[Bug 535297] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000028

Whatever the kernel (2.6.32-16 or 2.6.31-20) my 10.04 i86 beta 1 is running, Sun's VB 3.1.4 with contained Guest additions : - does not integrate the mouse - sets the screen to 1152×864 but it no longer resize to window's size -- BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00

[Bug 536929] Re: VirtualBox Guest Additions stopped working with the 2.6.32-16 kernel

Whatever the kernel (2.6.32-16 or 2.6.31-20) my 10.04 i86 beta 1 is running, Sun's VB 3.1.4 with contained Guest additions : - does not integrate the mouse - sets the screen to 1152×864 but it no longer resize to window's size ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- Virtu

[Bug 542374] Re: Close buttons are on the right, not consistent with Lucid themes

** Description changed: Binary package hint: openoffice.org What I expected to happen: - boot a consistent Lucid beta1LiveCD. +   boot a consistent Lucid beta1LiveCD. What really happened: - The current themes for Lucid Lynx have the window control buttons on the left, while open.o

[Bug 542374] [NEW] Close buttons are on the right, not consistent with Lucid themes

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org What I expected to happen: boot a consistent Lucid beta1LiveCD. What really happened: The current themes for Lucid Lynx have the window control buttons on the left, while open.office shows the document close button on the right. This i

Re: [Bug 352689] Re: jaunty beta liveCD resume freezes X on HP 6720 laptop w Intel GM965/GL960

Thanks for all the marvelous things coming with Ubuntu. > If you could test the current Ubuntu development version, this would help us > a lot. > When reporting bugs in the future please use apport, either via the > appropriate application's "Help -> Report a Problem" menu or using > 'ubuntu-bug'

Re: [Bug 434351] Re: gnome-language selector is labyrinthine

On 2010-03-17 17:05, Arne Goetje wrote : > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434351 > I agree, it needs to be fixed. Targeted for Lucid+1. > Thanks for an incentive to make more useful reports. ** -- gnome-language selector is labyrinthine https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434351 You received this

[Bug 538600] [NEW] Various bad Monitor resolutions after installation or monitor change

Public bug reported: In this case: Computer : Compaq Presario CQ5101BE. Video: nVidia GT200 (GeForce G210). Monitor: 1024×768 capable, no more. System: Ubuntu 9.10 What I expected to happen : install a system with correct screen resolution What happened instead: Rebooted just after the system wa

Re: [Bug 533781] Re: [bind9 packaging] DNS no longer works after uninstall

> How did you uninstall the bind9 package? > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SynapticHowto#Adding or Removing Software A complete removal is my habit. -- [bind9 packaging] DNS no longer works after unins

[Bug 533781] Re: [bind9 packaging] DNS no longer works after uninstall

** Description changed: Binary package hint: bind9 Using Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid). I installed bind9 as a caching nameserver. (BTW, kudos for the simplest BIND installation ever seen !!!) But BIND could overload my router's NAT table with UDP DNS requests. So, ... I uninstalled bin

[Bug 533781] [NEW] [bind9 packaging] DNS no longer works after uninstall

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bind9 Using Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid). I installed bind9 as a caching nameserver. (BTW, kudos for the simplest BIND installation ever seen !!!) But BIND could overload my router's NAT table with UDP DNS requests. So, ... I uninstalled bind9. BIND did not st

[Bug 220628] Re: [MASTER] firefox-3.0b5 received an X Window System error: 'BadIDChoice'

I'm surprised that I'm only the 6th person to tick the "me too". I'm really pested with exactly the same problem. Every half an hour or so, Firefox disappears when active with many windows and tabs. I also experienced Thunderbird disappearing, but far less often. Even Pidgin disappeared a couple o

[Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

name. + André Pirard: Update: + As I mentioned it before, in addition to requesting people to make spelling mistakes, this so-called WORKAROUND only works for sent e-mail and only when the error comes from the From: line, so that the person you send the e-mail to did not encounter the error if ev

Re: [Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

On 2009-12-15 16:39, C de-Avillez wrote : > ** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #534885 > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=534885 Thanks a lot. I have added a more affordable "Alternative, steps to reproduce" to launchpad description. I have also added 4 msdnmsgN(f+s).eml sample

[Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

** Attachment added: "mdnmsgN3.eml" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36867197/mdnmsgN3.eml -- Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/233990 You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

** Attachment added: "mdnmsgN2.eml" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36867187/mdnmsgN2.eml -- Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/233990 You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

** Attachment added: "mdnmsgN1.eml" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36867179/mdnmsgN1.eml -- Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/233990 You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

** Description changed: TESTED: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Karmic) - Thunderbird Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7pre) Gecko/20091214 Shredder/3.0.1pre (MozillaTeam PPA) +   Thunderbird Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7pre) Gecko/2009

Re: [Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

On 2009-12-15 00:36, C de-Avillez wrote : > > Some pout-pourri on previous comments: > >> There should *never* be a bare linefeed in SMTP transmission. >> Hence, if there is one, it *must* be a bug. >> > > I do not remember stating anything else. And, yes, I do know the > requirements in

Re: [Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

version html_answer.eml. Thanks. André. > 3.1. Can you repeat every time this error? > > 3.2. Just for grins, could you try again, after changing your email name > so that it will not have an accented 'e'? This is an area where I have > seen a lot of issues in the past, a

Re: [Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

-- Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/233990 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lis

[Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

** Attachment added: "html_answer.eml" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36757455/html_answer.eml -- Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/233990 You received this bug notification because you are a me

[Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

** Attachment added: "mdnmsg5.eml" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36739422/mdnmsg5.eml -- Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/233990 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

** Attachment added: "mdnmsg4.eml" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36739412/mdnmsg4.eml -- Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/233990 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

** Attachment added: "mdnmsg3.eml" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36739403/mdnmsg3.eml -- Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/233990 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

** Attachment added: "mdnmsg2.eml" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36739399/mdnmsg2.eml -- Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/233990 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

** Attachment added: "mdnmsg1.eml" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36739384/mdnmsg1.eml -- Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/233990 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

** Attachment added: "mdnmsg0.eml" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36739353/mdnmsg0.eml -- Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/233990 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

My goodness. I attached numbered files to my message. To be clear. As follows. Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="mdnmsg0.eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline; filename="mdnmsg0.eml" And it didn't find the name !!! And most probably shuffled them. Please someone

Re: [Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

Thanks to Aaron for setting this bug to /confirmed/ at last. On 2009-12-03 02:54, C de-Avillez wrote : > Well. I got here via André's email to BugSquad. Some comments and > requests: Thanks for coming, C. > 0. Being aggressive does not help. I'm not aggressive at all. I'm very calmly coming back

[Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

** Description changed: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 sends the attached Receipt message. (file as stolen from /tmp) qmail-ldap-1.03 complains that it contains a "bare lf". See attached dialog box & http://cr.yp.to/docs/smtplf.html Dialog box is acknowledged. Thunderbird just disappears. Rece

[Bug 9284] Re: Duplicate entries when synching calendar with evolution

Just in case it could be related. These two URLs explain how duplicate entries can easily occur with OpenSync. Be it calendar or contact or anything. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/151688/comments/5 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=399601&aid=2905875&grou

[Bug 151688] Re: Evolution cannot merge a second email

Evolution 2.24.3 on Ubuntu 8.10. Because of lack of doc and warning, "try if it works" philosophy, help us, and no group deletion enforcement when deleting partnerships, I found myself with my contacts hexadecaplicated (yes, that's 16 for 1, glorious). I followed someone's advice that if I moved

[Bug 233990] Re: Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail

** Summary changed: - Bare lf in mdn message from crashing thunderbird + Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail ** Description changed: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 sends the attached Receipt message. (file as stolen from /tmp) qmail-l

Re: [Bug 30201] Re: Return Receipt's prompt before allowing the mail to be read.

On 2009-10-23 00:04, Dimitrios Symeonidis wrote : > In all this arguing, has anyone checked if this is still an issue in > thunderbird 2.x ? > I tried checking, but for some reason it never asks me.. Yes (2.0.12). For those claiming that it's not a bug and/or needing more rationale... You must k

[Bug 429102] Re: [i945GM] display garbled only with Kubuntu Karmic

Another description and Title update. Problem is a font size. Title updated. Problem appears in GDM too and in all 8.04-9.10 releases. The problem appears to be yet another huge font size problem. Problem appears in GDM too and in all 8.04-9.10 releases. Gnome itself escapes the problem. KDE and

[Bug 434351] [NEW] gnome-language selector is labyrinthine

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: language-selector As of 09.10 Karmic ... An ample list of installed languages is awkward to determine in gnome-language-selector. (browsing through a long list, missing, and risking to forget the beginning as you reach the end ) If installed languages

<    1   2   3   4   5   >