[Bug 831230] Re: diff-ext version 0.3.2-2 failed to build in oneiric

2011-10-26 Thread Andrea Veri
I just had a look at nautilus-compare and it does its work pretty much well. Diff-ext's upstream is currently unavailable and converting it to GTK3 is definitely not an easy task. Will you maintain your software in the future in case of bugs or issues? I can eventually upload it to Debian and ask f

[Bug 831230] Re: diff-ext version 0.3.2-2 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-29 Thread Andrea Veri
I've also updated Debian's bug (#637314) accordingly, it actually went out of my TODO list. Matthias, should we set this bug report as confirmed again or should we keep it as it is until a new upstream release will be pushed to Debian? -- You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 831230] Re: diff-ext version 0.3.2-2 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-29 Thread Andrea Veri
I personally pinged upstream about this and Sergey (main upstream developer) is actually working on porting diff-ext to GTK3. I will upload an updated package into Debian as soon as a new upstream release will be published. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 493320] Re: Please merge gnuchess (5.07-6) from Debian Testing

2009-12-22 Thread Andrea Veri
there's no point in merging this anymore, it took too much time to perform the merge and in the meantime the latest revision migrated to testing. The right thing to do would be moving this bug report into a sync request again. Thanks. -- Please merge gnuchess (5.07-6) from Debian Testing https:

[Bug 459697] Re: [SRU] Nicotine fails to start due to GeoIP error

2009-11-07 Thread Andrea Veri
works fine here. -- [SRU] Nicotine fails to start due to GeoIP error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.co

[Bug 459697] Re: [SRU] Nicotine fails to start due to GeoIP error

2009-11-06 Thread Andrea Veri
I've uploaded it to Lucid yesterday already. -- [SRU] Nicotine fails to start due to GeoIP error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu

[Bug 459697] Re: [SRU] Nicotine fails to start due to GeoIP error

2009-11-05 Thread Andrea Veri
attaching debdiff for a fast review of the ubuntu-sru team. debdiffed nicotine_1.2.12+dfsg-1ubuntu1 and nicotine_1.2.12+dfsg- 1ubuntu1.1 ** Attachment added: "nicotine-sru.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35198270/nicotine-sru.debdiff -- [SRU] Nicotine fails to start due to GeoIP error

[Bug 459697] Re: [SRU] Nicotine fails to start due to GeoIP error

2009-11-05 Thread Andrea Veri
) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nicotine (Ubuntu Karmic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: nicotine (Ubuntu Karmic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrea Veri (av) ** Changed in: nicotine (Ubuntu) Assignee: Andrea Veri (av) => (unassigned)

[Bug 459697] Re: [SRU] Nicotine fails to start due to GeoIP error

2009-11-05 Thread Andrea Veri
thanks for your report, I think this fix needs to go into Karmic, moving this into an SRU request. ** Changed in: nicotine (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: nicotine (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrea Veri (av) -- [SRU] Nicotine fails to start due to

[Bug 459697] Re: [SRU] Nicotine fails to start due to GeoIP error

2009-11-05 Thread Andrea Veri
** Summary changed: - [karmic] Nicotine fails to start due to GeoIP error + [SRU] Nicotine fails to start due to GeoIP error -- [SRU] Nicotine fails to start due to GeoIP error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 474072] Re: Merge with Debian 2.28.0-1

2009-11-04 Thread Andrea Veri
I gonna commit part of the delta to the Debian's svn later, so we can sync from the next revision's row. ** Attachment added: "zenity.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35091930/zenity.debdiff -- Merge with Debian 2.28.0-1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474072 You received this bug notif

[Bug 474072] [NEW] Merge with Debian 2.28.0-1

2009-11-04 Thread Andrea Veri
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: zenity Merge frm Debian unstable, remaining changes: - debian/control.in: - don't B-D on scrollkeeper - debian/watch: - look for unstable versions too ** Affects: zenity (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: Confirmed ** Tags: deskto

[Bug 469900] Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Dependency Error

2009-11-02 Thread Andrea Veri
yes, a rebuild on a karmic pbuilder / PPA would have fixed that, without having the need to manually install the new dep. Anyway this package has some license issue plus upstream is no more active, but no one prevents you to run your own copy of the package on your PPA. -- Ubuntu 9.10 Dependency

[Bug 469900] Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Dependency Error

2009-11-02 Thread Andrea Veri
actually this package has been removed from the archive and installing a jaunty binary file into karmic won't work cause broken depends. If you really want to use this package you could just apt-get source it and build it on your own via a PPA or a local pbuilder running karmic. I'm marking this bu

[Bug 457577] Re: [FFe] Sync lordsawar 0.1.6-1 from Debian unstable

2009-10-22 Thread Andrea Veri
subscribing ubuntu-archive to process the sync since the FFe is now granted. -- [FFe] Sync lordsawar 0.1.6-1 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457577 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mail

[Bug 457577] [NEW] [FFe] Sync lordsawar 0.1.6-1 from Debian unstable

2009-10-21 Thread Andrea Veri
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: lordsawar Please sync lordsawar 0.1.6-1 from Debian unstable. This latest release fixes tons of bugs and the new features added seems to work fine on my karmic box. The package seems to work the right way and I didnt find out any issue while running it

[Bug 455836] [NEW] imagezoom should be removed from the archive

2009-10-19 Thread Andrea Veri
Public bug reported: Please remove imagezoom package from the archive, it's broken (it doesnt work in both ffox3.0 and ffox3.5) and upstream seems to be inactive from around 2 years. Waiting Alexander's ack, plus subscribing ubuntu-archive to process the removal request. ** Affects: imagezoom (U

[Bug 455497] Re: aMule is creating gmon.out file in home directory

2009-10-19 Thread Andrea Veri
I'm not able to reproduce this issue. I've installed the latest amule release available into the archive, and no gmon.out file is created. Plus as I told you before the --enable-profile flag is not given at build time. ** Changed in: amule (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: a

[Bug 455497] Re: aMule is creating gmon.out file in home directory

2009-10-19 Thread Andrea Veri
if you look at the rules file you will notice that --enable-profile is not called at all. -- aMule is creating gmon.out file in home directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455497 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 453040] Re: xpath expressions fail to properly deal with some namespace variants

2009-10-16 Thread Andrea Veri
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #551182 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551182 ** Also affects: mozilla-devscripts (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551182 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- xpath expressions fail to properl

[Bug 453040] [NEW] xpath expressions fail to properly deal with some namespace variants

2009-10-16 Thread Andrea Veri
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mozilla-devscripts Forwarding Debian Bug about xpath expressions fail to properly deal with some namespace variants. IRC logs: TARGET_VERSION = $(shell xpath -q -e '//em:targetApplication/Description[em:id="$(1)" or @em:id="$(1)"]/em:$(2)/text() | //

[Bug 449814] Re: winbind not installable

2009-10-13 Thread Andrea Veri
coreutils 6.10-6ubuntu1 [modified: bin/chmod] you are using a broken chmod. Marking this bug as invalid cause the bug is not there as the package installs fine on jaunty. -- winbind not installable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449814 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 449814] Re: winbind not installable

2009-10-13 Thread Andrea Veri
coreutils 6.10-6ubuntu1 [modified: bin/chmod] you are using a broken chmod. Marking this bug as invalid cause the bug is not there as the package installs fine on jaunty. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- winbind not installable https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Bug 449814] Re: winbind uninstallable

2009-10-13 Thread Andrea Veri
** Summary changed: - amule + winbind uninstallable ** Summary changed: - winbind uninstallable + winbind not installable -- winbind not installable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

[Bug 449814] Re: amule

2009-10-13 Thread Andrea Veri
latest windbind package version is 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5, (and you are installing 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.2) would you mind giving an apt-get update and try again? ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- amule https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449814 You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 449814] Re: amule

2009-10-13 Thread Andrea Veri
changing package from amule to winbind. ** Package changed: amule (Ubuntu) => samba (Ubuntu) -- amule https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.u

[Bug 449814] Re: amule

2009-10-13 Thread Andrea Veri
sorry, but why did you report the bug against amule if package is: winbind 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.2 I gonna close this if you don't provide a good rationale to keep this open. (I can't understand spanish, sorry) -- amule https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449814 You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 448706] Re: FTBFS, Needs to build with automake1.11

2009-10-11 Thread Andrea Veri
Uploaded. The debdiff didnt apply but I managed to fix it myself. Thanks for your work. ** Changed in: pam-shield (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: pam-shield (Ubuntu) Assignee: Andrea Veri (av) => (unassigned) -- FTBFS, Needs to build with automa

[Bug 448706] Re: FTBFS, Needs to build with automake1.11

2009-10-11 Thread Andrea Veri
** Changed in: pam-shield (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: pam-shield (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: pam-shield (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrea Veri (av) -- FTBFS, Needs to build with automake1.11 https://bugs.laun

[Bug 448669] Re: FTBFS, GLIBC2.10 scandir() changes

2009-10-11 Thread Andrea Veri
Uploaded. ** Changed in: fakechroot (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: fakechroot (Ubuntu) Assignee: Andrea Veri (av) => (unassigned) -- FTBFS, GLIBC2.10 scandir() changes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448669 You received this bug notification b

[Bug 448669] Re: FTBFS, GLIBC2.10 scandir() changes

2009-10-11 Thread Andrea Veri
** Changed in: fakechroot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: fakechroot (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: fakechroot (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrea Veri (av) -- FTBFS, GLIBC2.10 scandir() changes https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 430155] Re: [FFe] update speeddial to latest release 0.9.1.1

2009-10-11 Thread Andrea Veri
Vikram, I guess I won't be able to review anything this evening / night, so I need to do the update for you, Alexander needs it for monday and it's pretty late now. -- [FFe] update speeddial to latest release 0.9.1.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430155 You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 431979] Re: [security and bugfix release] amule 2.2.6

2009-10-09 Thread Andrea Veri
the patch is from debian and the code it's still there: if test -n "$GDLIB_VERSION"; then CAS_DEFS="-D__GD__" GDLIB_LIBS="-lgd $GDLIB_LIBS" if not the patch would have failed to apply. Closing the bug report as far as there is nothing to do. ** Changed in

[Bug 431979] Re: [security and bugfix release] amule 2.2.6

2009-10-09 Thread Andrea Veri
and anyway I don't need to look at any diff.gz file, I won't diverge the package from debian introducing new stuff when it's not required to. Thanks. -- [security and bugfix release] amule 2.2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431979 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 430155] Re: [FFe] update speeddial to latest release 0.9.1.1

2009-10-09 Thread Andrea Veri
** Summary changed: - [FFe] update speeddial to latest release 0.9.0.8 + [FFe] update speeddial to latest release 0.9.1.1 ** Description changed: - please update speeddial to latest 0.9.0.8 release. + please update speeddial to latest 0.9.1.1 release. Changelog is available at: http://spe

[Bug 430155] Re: speeddial uses wrong version of mozilla-devscripts

2009-10-09 Thread Andrea Veri
The package does *not* work on ffox3.5, cause: 2.0 3.0b2 you should package the latest upstream release, which is 0.9.0.8, that has a working ffox3.5 support. ** Summary changed: - speeddial uses wrong version of mozilla-devscripts + [FFe] update speeddial to latest release 0.9

[Bug 430155] Re: [FFe] update speeddial to latest release 0.9.0.8

2009-10-09 Thread Andrea Veri
Alexander should approve the task for us as far as we need an FFe now that we are past FF. Vikram, please read [1] to know what I'm talking about. [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess ** Description changed: - Use new features of mozilla-devscripts 0.14/0.15 + please update speedd

[Bug 430155] Re: speeddial uses wrong version of mozilla-devscripts

2009-10-09 Thread Andrea Veri
Still some issues: * no xpi:provides, xpi:enhances fields, they are both listed into the wiki page, so I assume you didnt read it carefully enough * there is no ${misc:Depends} field into depends. * debian/rules has still MOZ_EXTENSION_PKG := speeddial, which is deprecated. Listed on the wiki to

[Bug 431979] Re: [security and bugfix release] amule 2.2.6

2009-10-09 Thread Andrea Veri
Uploaded. ** Changed in: amule (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: amule (Ubuntu Karmic) Assignee: Andrea Veri (av) => (unassigned) -- [security and bugfix release] amule 2.2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431979 You received this bug notifi

[Bug 431979] Re: [security and bugfix release] amule 2.2.6

2009-10-09 Thread Andrea Veri
I can't grab data for untrusted repositories plus I think the current package has everything needed already. -- [security and bugfix release] amule 2.2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431979 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt

[Bug 430155] Re: speeddial uses wrong version of mozilla-devscripts

2009-10-08 Thread Andrea Veri
Assigned to Vikram, I gonna mentor him through this. ** Changed in: speeddial (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: speeddial (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: speeddial (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Vikram (dhillon-v10) -- speeddial uses wrong

[Bug 431979] Re: [security and bugfix release] amule 2.2.6

2009-10-08 Thread Andrea Veri
The package is ready, gonna test it a bit again tomorrow and then it should be ready for the upload. -- [security and bugfix release] amule 2.2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431979 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 431979] Re: [security and bugfix release] amule 2.2.6

2009-10-08 Thread Andrea Veri
Karmic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrea Veri (av) -- [security and bugfix release] amule 2.2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431979 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.

[Bug 431979] Re: [security and bugfix release] amule 2.2.6

2009-10-08 Thread Andrea Veri
an FFe is not required if there are no new features and as far as I can see this is a bug fix + security release, so we can start working on having it packaged asap. If for you guys is ok, I gonna take care of packaging / uploading this latest release. -- [security and bugfix release] amule 2.2.6

[Bug 430353] Re: Sync gnome-btdownload 0.0.32-2 from Debian unstable

2009-09-15 Thread Andrea Veri
subscribing ubuntu-archive to process the sync -- Sync gnome-btdownload 0.0.32-2 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.u

[Bug 430353] [NEW] Sync gnome-btdownload 0.0.32-2 from Debian unstable

2009-09-15 Thread Andrea Veri
ch's patch system. This refers to Debian Policy ยง 4.14. -- Andrea Veri Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:13:18 +0200 this release is a bug fix plus translations update only release, so it dont require an FFe ** Affects: gnome-btdownload (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: C

[Bug 425612] Re: mozilla-livehttpheaders not using the recommended version of mozilla-devscripts

2009-09-15 Thread Andrea Veri
Looks fine now. Uploaded. -- mozilla-livehttpheaders not using the recommended version of mozilla-devscripts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@

[Bug 425612] Re: mozilla-livehttpheaders not using the recommended version of mozilla-devscripts

2009-09-15 Thread Andrea Veri
still some issues: 1) document things better into the changelog 2) what's this: -Depends: firefox | abrowser +Depends: +Recommends: ${xpi:Depends} simply remove that empty depends line. -- mozilla-livehttpheaders not using the recommended version of mozilla-devscripts https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 425612] Re: mozilla-livehttpheaders not using the recommended version of mozilla-devscripts

2009-09-15 Thread Andrea Veri
you made one little error: -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5~) this is wrong and not required, I told you to add the ~ to mozilla- devscripts only, not to all build depends. you made one big error: +Recommends: ${xpi:Depends} added on the source target and not t

[Bug 428494] Re: long-url-pleases uses the wrong version of mozilla-devscripts

2009-09-13 Thread Andrea Veri
Fixed plus updated wiki page accordingly. ** Changed in: long-url-please (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- long-url-pleases uses the wrong version of mozilla-devscripts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, wh

[Bug 425612] Re: mozilla-livehttpheaders not using the recommended version of mozilla-devscripts

2009-09-12 Thread Andrea Veri
Assigning to vikram that will review / update this extension with my help. ** Changed in: livehttpheaders (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Vikram (dhillon-v10) -- mozilla-livehttpheaders not using the recommended version of mozilla-devscripts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425612 You rec

[Bug 409979] Re: Please backport nicotine+ 1.2.12 from Karmic to Jaunty

2009-09-11 Thread Andrea Veri
Ack from ubuntu-backporters. Subscribing ubuntu-archive to process the backport. Version to backport is: karmic / nicotine_1.2.12+dfsg-1ubuntu1 -- Please backport nicotine+ 1.2.12 from Karmic to Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409979 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 427790] Re: should be updated to a version compatible with firefox 3.5

2009-09-11 Thread Andrea Veri
thanks for your report, this gonna be fixed really soon, assigning to John, that will take care of having it fixed. -- should be updated to a version compatible with firefox 3.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427790 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 427790] Re: should be updated to a version compatible with firefox 3.5

2009-09-11 Thread Andrea Veri
** Changed in: greasemonkey (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: greasemonkey (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => John Vivirito (gnomefreak) -- should be updated to a version compatible with firefox 3.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427790 You received this bug notificat

[Bug 409979] Re: Please backport nicotine+ 1.2.12 from Karmic to Jaunty

2009-09-11 Thread Andrea Veri
Fix uploaded. As soon as the package gets built, I gonna subscribe ubuntu-archive to process the backport. Thanks for your work on triaging this out. ** Changed in: nicotine (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: nicotine (Ubuntu) Assignee: Andrea Veri (bluek

[Bug 409979] Re: Please backport nicotine+ 1.2.12 from Karmic to Jaunty

2009-09-11 Thread Andrea Veri
ntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: nicotine (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrea Veri (bluekuja) -- Please backport nicotine+ 1.2.12 from Karmic to Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409979 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 409979] Re: Please backport nicotine+ 1.2.12 from Karmic to Jaunty

2009-09-11 Thread Andrea Veri
I've opened the bug and gonna fix it really soon, so we won't need any debdiff for the backport, it should work fine without adjusting any depends. ** Also affects: nicotine (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please backport nicotine+ 1.2.12 from Karmic to Jaunty https://bug

[Bug 427796] [NEW] nicotine fails to startup cause a python-glade2 missing dependency

2009-09-11 Thread Andrea Veri
t;, line 251, in run from pynicotine.gtkgui import frame File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/pynicotine/gtkgui/frame.py", line 22, in import gtk, gtk.glade ImportError: No module named glade ** Affects: nicotine (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Andrea V

[Bug 391279] Re: [FFe][karmic] Please update verlihub to 0.9.8e-r2 version

2009-09-10 Thread Andrea Veri
problems is there all multiple builds flags / options that could be used and you know, we cannot build a package with different build options in it. So, it's up to you, but my suggestion is to not re-introduce it into the archive. -- [FFe][karmic] Please update verlihub to 0.9.8e-r2 version https

[Bug 391279] Re: [FFe][karmic] Please update verlihub to 0.9.8e-r2 version

2009-09-10 Thread Andrea Veri
@Stefan, this package shouldnt be re-uploaded into Debian again, it would make no sense. Looks like users prefers to build / install it manually to enable any eventual feature. The popcon reported 30 installations in Debian, so I would suggest to not re-introduce this package again into the archiv

[Bug 425784] Re: firefox-ubuntu-it-menu uses wrong version of mozilla-devscripts

2009-09-09 Thread Andrea Veri
Done. -- firefox-ubuntu-it-menu uses wrong version of mozilla-devscripts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425784 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubunt

[Bug 425784] Re: firefox-ubuntu-it-menu uses wrong version of mozilla-devscripts

2009-09-08 Thread Andrea Veri
Gonna add a fix for that extra license file lintian complains about and then the package should be ready to get uploaded. Will do it tomorrow. Thanks John for your work on this. ** Changed in: ubuntu-it-menu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: ubuntu-it-menu (Ubuntu)

[Bug 425631] Re: bindwood not using the correct version of mozilla-devscripts

2009-09-07 Thread Andrea Veri
re-assigning to the right source package plus marking bindwood (project) and firefox-extentions targets as invalid as far as I've moved the bug against the right source package in question. ** Also affects: bindwood (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: firefox-exten

[Bug 425612] Re: mozilla-livehttpheaders not using the recommended version of mozilla-devscripts

2009-09-07 Thread Andrea Veri
re-assigning to the right package, which is livehttpheaders source package. Marking firefox-extension target as invalid as far as it's not needed here. ** Also affects: livehttpheaders (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: firefox-extensions Status: New => Inv

[Bug 423159] Re: [FFE] Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-09-06 Thread Andrea Veri
subscribing ubuntu-archive to process the sync. -- [FFE] Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list u

[Bug 422182] Re: New version (0.5.0) of QARecord released

2009-09-05 Thread Andrea Veri
when writing a changelog you should document every change you made on the package and therefore if any of your changes fixes a bug, you have to specify the bug ID to be closed with this syntax: (LP: #xx), so if your package fixes two bugs, both of them should be listed. -- New version (0.5.

[Bug 423801] Re: Sync audacity 1.3.9-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-09-03 Thread Andrea Veri
This requires an FFe. Please have a look at this wiki page and update the bug accordingly: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess unsubscribing u-u-s for now. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) =

[Bug 400605] Re: [FFe] Sync alarm-clock 1.2.3-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2009-09-03 Thread Andrea Veri
Which kind of tests have you done with this package? was it completely working on karmic? unsubscribing u-u-s, motu-release will process your request. -- [FFe] Sync alarm-clock 1.2.3-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400605 You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 405816] Re: Please update web.py to version 0.32

2009-09-03 Thread Andrea Veri
When requesting an FFe, the status should be set to *new*. Which kind of tests have you done with this package? Did you check if the new features are really working on karmic? unsubscribing u-u-s, motu-release will process your request. ** Changed in: webpy (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Ne

[Bug 423284] Re: Please sync velocity from debian (1.6.2) to universe (at the moment 1.4)

2009-09-03 Thread Andrea Veri
As I told you on IRC before, this requires an FFE. For more informations about FF, please have a look at this link and update the bug accordingly: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess ** Changed in: velocity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: velocity (Ubuntu)

[Bug 423683] Re: Sync bitlbee-skype 0.7.2-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (contrib)

2009-09-03 Thread Andrea Veri
This requires an FFe as we are past FF. Please read the following wiki and eventually update your bug report: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess Unsubscribing u-u-s for now, until you update the bug plus assigning the task to you. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Incomplet

[Bug 423159] Re: [FFE] Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-09-03 Thread Andrea Veri
Under 3.0.1.6 changelog's entry (dated 2007) I see: # UI | Option to auto-download and install updates So, again, this is not a new feature at all. I remember using it in past versions of azureus (vuze) without having any problem. (e.g they were not disabled) -- [FFE] Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (u

[Bug 423159] Re: [FFE] Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-09-03 Thread Andrea Veri
@Scott, yes, there is a feature inside that allows you to update azureus plugins (azureus is having this behaviour since a lot of releases, so this is not a *new* feature). But as Onkar said those core-updates are disabled in both Debian / Ubuntu packaging. (anyway they install everything into

[Bug 423159] Re: [FFE] Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-09-02 Thread Andrea Veri
** Changed in: azureus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- [FFE] Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bu

[Bug 423159] Re: [FFE] Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-09-02 Thread Andrea Veri
I've tested the package on karmic and everything seems to work properly: 1. speed test (just fixed in this release) works fine 2. check for updates plus updates installations are doing their work 3. in general, the whole bittorrent client is having the right behaviour while downloading / uploadin

[Bug 423159] Re: [FFE] Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-09-02 Thread Andrea Veri
connected peers) [Parg] + BUGFIX: Core | Fixed deadlock during UI initialisation [Parg] + + I think this should be synced, therefore I'm subscribing motu-release to + process this. ** Changed in: azureus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Changed in: azureus (Ubuntu) Assignee

[Bug 423159] Re: [FFE] Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-09-02 Thread Andrea Veri
** Summary changed: - Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). + [FFE] Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). -- [FFE] Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423159 You received this bug notific

[Bug 414410] Re: Sync scilab 5.1.1-8 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2009-09-02 Thread Andrea Veri
Looks fine now. Sync request Acked. ** Changed in: scilab (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed ** Changed in: scilab (Ubuntu) Assignee: Andrea Veri (bluekuja) => (unassigned) -- Sync scilab 5.1.1-8 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Bug 423159] Re: Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-09-02 Thread Andrea Veri
requestsync does its work properly. But from what I see: 1. you subscribed ubuntu-archive which is wrong 2. we are under FF, so the bug title (you choose) is wrong 3. you didnt wait for an ~ubuntu-dev member to process the sync Would you mind moving this to a FFe? if not, I gonna take care of havi

[Bug 423159] Re: Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-09-02 Thread Andrea Veri
Also please do *not* subscribe ubuntu-archive before having your request acked. -- Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 423159] Re: Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-09-02 Thread Andrea Veri
Please don't mark the bug as confirmed before an Ubuntu Developer process it. Please follow the FFe procedure then set the bug to *new* status. ** Changed in: azureus (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.la

[Bug 423159] Re: Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-09-02 Thread Andrea Veri
This sync requires an FFe. Please take a look at this link for more informations: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess -- Sync azureus 4.2.0.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 420426] Re: sun-java6 6b16 update for karmic, hardy and jaunty

2009-09-02 Thread Andrea Veri
Latest remaining task is karmic. This new upstream release can be considered as a 'bug fix' only release according to this link: http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/6u16.html So we should *not* need an FFe for it. Marking the karmic task as confirmed plus waiting a feedback from Matthias about

[Bug 414410] Re: Sync scilab 5.1.1-8 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2009-09-02 Thread Andrea Veri
Looks like scilab_5.1.1-8 still FTBFS. Logs available here: https://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=scilab&ver=5.1.1-8&arch=amd64&file=log Something went wrong again? ** Changed in: scilab (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Summary changed: - Sync scilab 5.1.1-8 (universe) from Debi

[Bug 421852] Re: [FFE] Sync fische-3.0.3-1 from Debian unstable

2009-09-02 Thread Andrea Veri
subscribing ubuntu-archive to process the sync. -- [FFE] Sync fische-3.0.3-1 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421852 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt

[Bug 421852] [NEW] [FFE] Sync fische-3.0.3-1 from Debian unstable

2009-08-31 Thread Andrea Veri
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: fische Please sync fische-3.0.3-1 from Debian unstable. This new upstream release includes some new features plus the possibility to build the package on all (any) archs. (before archs were restricted to x86 / x86_64 cause some SIMD(MMX/SSE) bits on the c

[Bug 420221] Re: [FFE] Sync cgmail-0.6-1 from Debian unstable

2009-08-28 Thread Andrea Veri
Subscribing ubuntu-archive to process the sync. -- [FFE] Sync cgmail-0.6-1 from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.

[Bug 420221] [NEW] [FFE] Sync cgmail-0.6-1 from Debian unstable

2009-08-27 Thread Andrea Veri
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cgmail Please sync cgmail-0.6-1 from Debian unstable. This latest release includes new features and a lot of bug fixes (mostly crashes) such as: Bug #379840 Bug #196901 (that has 8 duplicates) Bug #215990 Bug #208683 And any other you can find on the li

[Bug 368855] Re: formatwarning() definition from cherrypy3 incompatible with Python 2.6

2009-08-21 Thread Andrea Veri
and yeah, it really seems that version 3.1.1-3 got synced instead of the 3.1.2-1 you suggested to sync on the bug title. Just ask for a new sync then. -- formatwarning() definition from cherrypy3 incompatible with Python 2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368855 You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 368855] Re: formatwarning() definition from cherrypy3 incompatible with Python 2.6

2009-08-21 Thread Andrea Veri
Maybe you mean this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cherrypy3/+bug/414501 It seems to be the latest sync processed on karmic. -- formatwarning() definition from cherrypy3 incompatible with Python 2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368855 You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 337126] Re: Please sync flup (1.0.2-1) from Debian unstable

2009-08-16 Thread Andrea Veri
Removing u-u-s as subscriber. No sponsorship action is needed here. -- Please sync flup (1.0.2-1) from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ub

[Bug 414410] Re: scilab 5.1.1-7 seems to FTBFS (sync request invalid for now)

2009-08-16 Thread Andrea Veri
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #541670 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541670 ** Also affects: scilab (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541670 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- scilab 5.1.1-7 seems to FTBFS (sync request i

[Bug 414410] Re: scilab 5.1.1-7 seems to FTBFS (sync request invalid for now)

2009-08-16 Thread Andrea Veri
** Summary changed: - Sync scilab 5.1.1-7 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). + scilab 5.1.1-7 seems to FTBFS (sync request invalid for now) ** Description changed: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 affects ubuntu/scilab status new importance wishlist subscribe

[Bug 414410] Re: Sync scilab 5.1.1-7 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-08-16 Thread Andrea Veri
the package FTBFS on Debian too, so it seems to be *not* an Ubuntu- related issue. Debian logs here: https://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=scilab -- scilab 5.1.1-7 seems to FTBFS (sync request invalid for now) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414410 You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 414410] Re: Sync scilab 5.1.1-7 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-08-16 Thread Andrea Veri
The package seems to FTBFS on karmic: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30390411/buildlog_ubuntu- karmic-i386.scilab_5.1.1-7~ppa3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz Update this bug report right after you have some news about this. Thanks for your work. ** Changed in: scilab (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomple

[Bug 414382] Re: Please sync eb 4.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-08-16 Thread Andrea Veri
Before I forgot that automated sync request are no more active since DIF, so if you need some other packages to be synced just do as you did before. Thanks for your work. -- Please sync eb 4.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414382 You received this bug

[Bug 414382] Re: Please sync eb 4.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-08-16 Thread Andrea Veri
I've built it for you and seems to build correctly into a karmic pbuilder. Sync request Acked. ** Changed in: eb (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Please sync eb 4.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414382 You received this bug notification be

[Bug 414410] Re: Sync scilab 5.1.1-7 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-08-16 Thread Andrea Veri
please provide a build log taken building latest debian revision on a karmic pbuilder. Removing u-u-s as subscriber gonna take care of this sync request. -- Sync scilab 5.1.1-7 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414410 You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 414382] Re: Please sync eb 4.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-08-16 Thread Andrea Veri
latest debian revision got uploaded on 26 jul, and since then no automated sync runs of this package happened. Let's sync it manually then. Please provide a build log as usually. -- Please sync eb 4.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414382 You received

[Bug 414382] Re: Please sync eb 4.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2009-08-16 Thread Andrea Veri
yes, I've understood, but as I said before, this package will be auto- synced on the next sync run, (don't know on which day it runs) so I guess we can just wait an automated sync without bothering archive admins with a manual sync. What do you think? (it will be sure synced *before* feature freeze

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >