[Bug 976534] Re: Rhythmbox cummulates memory in precise - probably memory leak

2012-07-10 Thread Benjamin Herbert
I am affected with 11.10. I just discovered that my Rhythmbox used 1.8 GB of memory. I then killed it and started it again. I notice that skipping to or playing a new song eats up memory. If I skip to a next song, about 25 MB of memory are consumed and not properly released anymore. So if I clic

[Bug 976534] Re: Rhythmbox cummulates memory in precise - probably memory leak

2012-07-10 Thread Benjamin Herbert
Sorry, accidentally clicked the post button. It seems that the memory consumption has something to do with the cover art plugin, which is enabled. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/976534

[Bug 646807] Re: Nautilus shows non-existing folder in breadcrump bar

2011-05-27 Thread Benjamin Herbert
It seems that now the folder is correctly removed from the breadcrumb bar after it is deleted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646807 Title: Nautilus shows non-existing folder in bread

[Bug 786505] Re: Window management - Super + W does not zoom out on all windows in all workspaces - minimized windows are ignored

2011-05-23 Thread Benjamin Herbert
Could you briefly explain why this will create further instability in the stack? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786505 Title: Window management - Super + W does not zoom out on all wi

[Bug 727721] [NEW] Closing a grouped Window in the Window List changes the order of the remaining windows

2011-03-02 Thread Benjamin Herbert
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel Using Window List 2.30.2 I find that if you have multiple windows grouped and start closing the windows by clicking with the right mouse button and close several but one of the windows, the position of the entry is changed. I do not know if t

[Bug 646807] Re: Nautilus shows non-existing folder in breadcrump bar

2010-09-24 Thread Benjamin Herbert
** Attachment added: "Screenshot showing the wrong behaving breadcrump bar" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646807/+attachment/1631112/+files/bug-nautilus.png -- Nautilus shows non-existing folder in breadcrump bar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646807 You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 646807] [NEW] Nautilus shows non-existing folder in breadcrump bar

2010-09-24 Thread Benjamin Herbert
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus 1) lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 2) apt-cache policy nautilus nautilus: Installed: 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.1 Candidate: 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.1 Version table: *** 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.1 0 500 http://de

[Bug 157478] Re: Brasero reports incorrect medium size & status

2010-08-31 Thread Benjamin Herbert
** Attachment added: "Screenshot of the Brasero Image Burning Setup Window showing a wrong capacity" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/157478/+attachment/1531754/+files/Screenshot-Image%20Burning%20Setup.png -- Brasero reports incorrect medium size & status https://bugs

[Bug 157478] Re: Brasero reports incorrect medium size & status

2010-08-31 Thread Benjamin Herbert
However, in my case it shows 10.8 MB of data for an empty 700 MB CD-R disk. -- Brasero reports incorrect medium size & status https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 157478] Re: Brasero reports incorrect medium size & status

2010-08-31 Thread Benjamin Herbert
I can confirm this on several Ubuntu 10.04 LTS installations on different PCs with different CD-Rs. -- Brasero reports incorrect medium size & status https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 575159] Re: Rhythmbox eats a HUGE amount of memory on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (even if no music is running)

2010-08-31 Thread Benjamin Herbert
No, I can not confirm this. "Can not" in the sense that I am now running a freshly installed Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. As far as I remember correctly, I did not install any plugins or changed the configuration when the problem existed. The only additional information is, that I did an update from 9.10 to

[Bug 575159] Re: Rhythmbox eats a HUGE amount of memory on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (even if no music is running)

2010-07-08 Thread Benjamin Herbert
In the meanwhile I reinstalled Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and the problem does not occur anymore. I think this can be closed then. -- Rhythmbox eats a HUGE amount of memory on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (even if no music is running) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575159 You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 575159] Re: Rhythmbox eats a HUGE amount of memory on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (even if no music is running)

2010-05-06 Thread Benjamin Herbert
I don't think this is of low importance, as it practically renders rhythmbox useless for me on the 64-bit system. It runs fine on a 32-bit machine. -- Rhythmbox eats a HUGE amount of memory on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (even if no music is running) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575159 You received this

[Bug 575159] Re: Rhythmbox eats a HUGE amount of memory on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (even if no music is running)

2010-05-04 Thread Benjamin Herbert
I installed and ran Valgrind, and tried to follow your instructions. Rhythmbox does not crash, so I just let it run for a while and then closed the program. I also started a song and stopped it. The log grew to 2.5 GB... I then killed rhythmbox and restarted it, just letting it "idle" over night

[Bug 575159] [NEW] Rhythmbox eats a HUGE amount of memory on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (even if no music is running)

2010-05-04 Thread Benjamin Herbert
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox Expected behaviour: Starting the program, it should open up and should consume a reasonable low amount of RAM ( < 100 MB). Actual behaviour Starting the program, it opens up slowly and consumes a HUGE amount of RAM ( > 1000 MB). It does not s

[Bug 151072] Re: WPA not working after suspend to disk

2008-10-29 Thread Benjamin Herbert
This has nothing to with acpi-support but with device naming of udev. ** Changed in: acpi-support (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- WPA not working after suspend to disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whi

[Bug 151522] Re: network device changes from eth1 to eth0

2007-11-28 Thread Benjamin Herbert
I deinstalled network-manager and still have this problem... I guess perhaps udev causes this? -- network device changes from eth1 to eth0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151522 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- u

[Bug 151522] Re: network device changes from eth1 to eth0

2007-10-18 Thread Benjamin Herbert
** Attachment added: "The logs demanded https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingHardwareDetection"; http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10059506/logs.tar -- network device changes from eth1 to eth0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151522 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

[Bug 151522] Re: network device changes from eth1 to eth0

2007-10-18 Thread Benjamin Herbert
Oct 18 20:11:05 xubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 23.358339] zd1211rw 3-3:1.0: firmware version 4605 Oct 18 20:11:05 xubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 23.400325] zd1211rw 3-3:1.0: zd1211 chip 0ace:1211 v4330 high 00-11-f6 RF2959_RF pa0 - Oct 18 20:11:05 xubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 23.403050] zd1211rw 3-3

[Bug 151522] network device changes from eth1 to eth0

2007-10-11 Thread Benjamin Herbert
Public bug reported: After reboot or suspend to disk the eth1 wireless card changes to eth0. This renders the configuration for the wifi card useless. There was no change to the system. Only a reboot. I think it is the order the system assigns to the two network cards present.. Sometimes it i

[Bug 151072] Re: WPA not working after suspend to disk

2007-10-11 Thread Benjamin Herbert
I encountered that this issue has something to do with the ordering of network devices. Sometimes the order of the network devices is not the same as for what my configuration is written for. In this case eth1 becomes eth0 and this is why my network does not work anymore. -- WPA not working aft

[Bug 151072] Re: WPA not working after suspend to disk

2007-10-11 Thread Benjamin Herbert
The error message is: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth1: link is not ready I did encounter this now also on a clean boot. If I do a suspend to disk, it seems to "fix" this. -- WPA not working after suspend to disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151072 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 151072] WPA not working after suspend to disk

2007-10-09 Thread Benjamin Herbert
Public bug reported: With xubuntu 7.10 (beta) and a working USB WiFi Stick (zydas1211 chipset) and WPA connection throught wpa_supplicant to an access-point the connection is broken after going to Suspend-to-Disk (Hibernate) It does not resume connection and in dmesg there is a message that the d