Not really. I never tried reproducing the bug, and I don't remember
exactly what I was working on at the moment. I just sent the backtrace
because the error reporter asked me to. Sorry. Anyway, it was a one time
thing, I continued working OK after restarting the browser.
However, I'm not really
Hi! I'm getting this same problem with Edgy right now. If I deciphered
this page right, it's about apt in general, and it should be fixed...
Any pointers?
--
apt-get update failing with bad signature.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24234
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Oh, and by the way, it's not intermittent, it's been happening for a
couple of weeks now. My outputs is:
W: GPG error: http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy-proposed Release: The following
signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic
Signing Key [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: GPG
Public bug reported:
Using Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1b1) Gecko/20060601
BonEcho/2.0b1 (Ubuntu-edgy)
I was working on a large document at www.writely.com and, during spell-
checking, Firefox crashed.
** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged
Status:
** Attachment added: crash dump
http://librarian.launchpad.net/4216025/_usr_lib_firefox_firefox-bin.1000.crash
--
Crash while spell-checking in Writely
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59873
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
I recently started using Ubuntu Dapper, and there's one single issue
that made it hard to use: it's relatively hard to find information
specific for the version I use.
There are now five Ubuntu versions (one current, one in development, two
supported, one obsolete). On the
Public bug reported:
After installing ubuntu, I was repeatedly forced to add new
repositories to have access to some applications. (Examples: cinelerra,
amarok 1.4.1, automatix.) This is sub-optimal.
1) It should be easier for any developer to enter his packages in an
Ubuntu repository (isn't
Well, I agree it's not a bug, I intended it in the same way as
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+bug/1 :)
It's true that we have no control over the internet. But I think making
a sort of marketing effort to make the several versions of Ubuntu
visible would help a lot with that.
See how
Oh, and about the wiki (or, in general, our documentation), I think
there the effort could be more sustained. This report is very general,
perhaps a more specific request for enhancement could be posted for a
specific team. But I don't know Ubuntu well enough, yet, to know where
to address it.
--
1) That's two problems then :)
(a) I had no idea it was discouraged, despite the fact that I tend to read
documentation a lot. (When I can find it, see [Bug 57116] :)
(b) I don't know if we have anything in the repositories that's analogue to
the Automatix thing. (Like a common-universe
Oh, I forgot to thank you for the link :). But (AFAIK) it's not about
the drivers, it's about a little program that can change the resolutions
preprogrammed in the BIOS, whichI don't need yet because it already has
all those I need.
--
It's hard to find relevant Ubuntu documentation because of
1101 - 1111 of 1111 matches
Mail list logo
