[Bug 1927777] [NEW] Ubuntu 18.04 clamav-freshclam default configuration has too short a timeout

2021-05-07 Thread Mark Bourne
Public bug reported: The postinst script for the Ubuntu 18.04 clamav-freshclam 0.103.2 package creates a default freshclam.conf file with "ReceiveTimeout=30". At least for me, this was too short to be able to download the initial virus definition files. With the recent rate limiting on ClamAV's

[Bug 1752215] Re: Server - LAMP installation no longer asks for a mysql password

2018-12-29 Thread bourne
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes Assignee: (unassigned) => bourne (lahpo) ** Changed in: ubuntu-manual-tests Assignee: Kev Bowring (flocculant) => bourne (lahpo) ** Changed in: serverguide Assignee: Doug Smythies (dsmythies) => bourne (lahpo) ** Changed in: mysql-5.7 (

[Bug 1798059] [NEW] package isc-dhcp-server 4.3.5-3ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: installed isc-dhcp-server package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2018-10-16 Thread Jason Bourne
Public bug reported: I don't know anything about the issue.# Operating system said there is an issue and do you want to report it. I said yes :) ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: isc-dhcp-server 4.3.5-3ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-34.37-generic 4.15.18

[Bug 1426474] [NEW] package libcups2:i386 1.7.2-0ubuntu1.5 failed to install/upgrade: package libcups2:i386 is already installed and configured

2015-02-27 Thread Julian Bourne
Public bug reported: Was informed of this by Updater 14.04 LTS x64 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: libcups2:i386 1.7.2-0ubuntu1.5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-45.74-generic 3.13.11-ckt13 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-45-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl

[Bug 170049] Re: Inverted ruler co-ordinate system

2014-03-09 Thread Jayson Bourne
Having read all that is written here over several years I came to the following conclusion: Surely somewhere someone must be sitting laughing at us, because they know something we don't. Every time someone tries to address this issue it gets shot down. Without explanation! The developers don't

Re: [Bug 1086675] Re: When I install ubuntu on my desktop it comes a bug.

2012-12-05 Thread Jason Bourne
Thanks for your timely email ,I'm so grateful for your work , I know Linux will become more and more popular by the great work you do ! I have guessed you'll say that's backtrack ,not ubuntu ,but backtrack is based on ubuntu 10.10LTS , but it is the bug told me to contact with the website

[Bug 1086675] [NEW] When I install ubuntu on my desktop it comes a bug.

2012-12-04 Thread Jason Bourne
Public bug reported: I boot up my backtrack linux 5 r3 livecd using editing the grub's menu.lst like that: title BackTrack5 Text - Default Boot Text Mode root (hd0,0) kernel /casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/custom.seed boot=casper text splash vga=791-- initrd /casper/initrd.gz boot

[Bug 902586] [NEW] package firefox 10.0~a2~hg20111206r80733-0ubuntu1~umd1~lucid failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-12-10 Thread bourne
AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: bourne 1661 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: bourne 1661 F...m pulseaudio BuildID: 20111207084226 CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xf6fdc000 irq 21' Mixer

[Bug 902586] Re: package firefox 10.0~a2~hg20111206r80733-0ubuntu1~umd1~lucid failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-12-10 Thread bourne
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/902586 Title: package firefox 10.0~a2~hg20111206r80733-0ubuntu1~umd1~lucid failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script

[Bug 874104] [NEW] sudo nvidia-xconfig

2011-10-14 Thread bourne
Public bug reported: Could not apply the stored configuration for monitors none of the selected modes were compatible with the possible modes: Trying modes for CRTC 351 CRTC 351: trying mode 1280x800@50Hz with output at 3200x1080@51Hz (pass 0) CRTC 351: trying mode 1280x800@51Hz with output at

[Bug 874104] Re: sudo nvidia-xconfig

2011-10-14 Thread bourne
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874104 Title: sudo nvidia-xconfig To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/874104/+subscriptions --

[Bug 304778] [NEW] Flash videos do not play General Error Displayed

2008-12-03 Thread Les Bourne
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 8.10 Flash videos such as on www.cnn.com do not play instead General Error message displayed. On other sites prompted to installed latest flash player. Adobe flash 10 reinstalled four times which I believe in the latest. Any help on fixing this problem would be

[Bug 304778] Re: Flash videos do not play General Error Displayed

2008-12-03 Thread Les Bourne
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20178293/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20178294/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20178295/ProcStatus.txt -- Flash

Re: [Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?

2008-01-21 Thread Bourne
Conrad Knauer Is it advisable to download a random .deb file? I know there are scripts that download flash, and install it. Also at least the user can read the script, and see what it is doing,however. With a prepackage deb that some unknown user made there is the potential for other issues is

[Bug 184914] Fan is set to run at 100%

2008-01-21 Thread Bourne
Public bug reported: The current drivers included in 8.04 set the fan to 100% after installing. ** Affects: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Fan is set to run at 100% https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184914 You received this bug

Re: [Bug 184914] Re: Fan is set to run at 100%

2008-01-21 Thread Bourne
Yes that is correct. When installing the nividia glx-new drivers, and after restarting the machine the GPU fan is set to run a 100%. Currently the only way to adjust this is through the use of nvclock. On Jan 21, 2008 7:19 PM, Murat Güneş [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for your report. Is the

[Bug 184914] Re: [Hardy] NVIDIA GPU fan is set to run at 100%

2008-01-21 Thread Bourne
Seems a fix has been released http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_display_ia32_169.09.html -- [Hardy] NVIDIA GPU fan is set to run at 100% https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184914 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. --

Re: [Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?

2008-01-18 Thread Bourne
@Matt Darcy The conclusion from what I am gathering here is users wanting flash will either have to use the workarounds, install flash direct from adobe or wait until Hardy's release correct? On Jan 18, 2008 11:03 AM, Matt Darcy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well said, the ammount of update the

Re: [Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?

2008-01-11 Thread Bourne
There is also the matter of the below bug which seems to affect the current version of flash that is installable in the hardy repo https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/180439 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/182013 Wouldn't the above

Re: [Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?

2008-01-04 Thread Bourne
Cyrus are you saying there is no current plan to fix this problem with regard to previous versions of Ubuntu, and the only way to get flash properly is to wait for 8.04? On Jan 4, 2008 6:27 PM, Cyrus Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: April 24th https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardyReleaseSchedule --

Re: [Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?

2007-12-24 Thread Bourne
Another option that may be of use is posted here http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=476924 This will install flash on 64bit, and should hold you over till a fix is posted. On Dec 24, 2007 5:04 AM, curtlee2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fabián Rodríguez Workaround: install the Flash plugin

Re: [Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?

2007-12-19 Thread Bourne
GICodeWarrior Couldn't a complete backup of the previous known working version be keep on a Canonical/Ubuntu server. This way if there is any problems with this particular package again the user could simply use aptitude to pull the package from a dedicated Ubuntu server/repo, and not pull it

Re: [Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?

2007-12-11 Thread Bourne
Matt it's my understanding that currently users of Ubuntu 64bit are still affected, and are currently waiting for the package in question to be built, and uploaded to repos for Gutsy 7.10. This issue may still affect 32bit 7.10users as well, however. I'm not sure on that. On Dec 11, 2007 8:34 AM,

Re: [Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?

2007-12-08 Thread Bourne
Thanks for the update Jan, and for the fix. On Dec 9, 2007 6:22 AM, Jan Claeys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @battles33: You shouldn't use Debian's CDBS package, it could break on your Ubuntu system. Use ubuntu's CDDB package instead. Also, @everyone, Brandon more or less promised me to ask for

Re: [Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?

2007-12-07 Thread Bourne
Has this been fixed regarding users of Ubuntu 64bit versions? As currently the issue of flash not installing is there. On Dec 7, 2007 11:07 AM, Mathieu Laurent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This bug is fixed, try to download the new package or wait the update.

[Bug 174438] md5sum mismatch install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz on Ubuntu 7.10 64bit

2007-12-06 Thread Bourne
Public bug reported: This md5sum mismatch still persists on a fresh Gutsy 71.0 Ubuntu 64bit install. When installing via synaptic on is lead to believe the package has installed,however. upon testing a website with flash content it becomes obvious the flash plugin did not install. Running this