[Bug 1926298] Re: Segfault added in the recent changes

2021-04-30 Thread Dan Bungert
.2.debdiff ** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: New => Confirmed ** Tags added: patch ** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu Hirsute) Assignee: Dan Bungert (dbungert) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whi

[Bug 1926298] Re: Segfault added in the recent changes

2021-04-30 Thread Dan Bungert
** Description changed: [Impact] On hirsute/impish, update-notifier can crash when attempting to run hooks. This issue is the #2 crash on update-notifier in hirsute, presently (and maybe some of the others). I would call this a severe regression. + + In the crash cases, cleanup steps

[Bug 1926298] Re: Segfault added in the recent changes

2021-04-30 Thread Dan Bungert
** Description changed: [Impact] - On Hirsute/Impish, update-notifier can crash when attempting to run - hooks. + On hirsute/impish, update-notifier can crash when attempting to run hooks. + This issue is the #2 crash on update-notifier in hirsute, presently (and + maybe some of the others).

[Bug 1926298] Re: Segfault added in the recent changes

2021-04-30 Thread Dan Bungert
Test hooks to cover the cases introduced by the original change. ** Attachment added: "tests.tgz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/1926298/+attachment/5493991/+files/tests.tgz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1926298] Re: Segfault added in the recent changes

2021-04-29 Thread Dan Bungert
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + On Hirsute/Impish, update-notifier can crash when attempting to run + hooks. + + [Test Case] + + Create a file 'bug' + + 'Name: bug + Priority: Low + Command: "/bin/true" + DisplayIf: /bin/true + Description: update notifier bug' + + and copy it to

[Bug 1926298] Re: Segfault added in the recent changes

2021-04-27 Thread Dan Bungert
** Attachment added: "_usr_bin_update-notifier.1000.crash" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/1926298/+attachment/5492933/+files/_usr_bin_update-notifier.1000.crash -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1926298] Re: Segfault added in the recent changes

2021-04-27 Thread Dan Bungert
It is a patch but I'm not looking for a sponsor at this time, since it's going thru the MP. ** Tags removed: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926298 Title: Segfault added in

[Bug 1926298] Re: Segfault added in the recent changes

2021-04-27 Thread Dan Bungert
MP: https://code.launchpad.net/~dbungert/update-notifier/+git/update- notifier/+merge/401901 ** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926298] Re: Segfault added in the recent changes

2021-04-27 Thread Dan Bungert
Root cause: The goto out for cleanup can skip a variable initialization, so in some cases we crash on if(pathdirs) g_strfreev(pathdirs); because

[Bug 1926298] Re: Segfault added in the recent changes

2021-04-27 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926298 Title: Segfault added in the recent changes To manage

[Bug 1926298] Re: Segfault added in the recent changes

2021-04-27 Thread Dan Bungert
Marking confirmed as I can see a segfault, but mine looks a little different: Thread 1 "update-notifier" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. show_next_hook (hooks=0x55778340 = {...}, ta=, ta=) at hooks.c:376 376 gtk_widget_hide(priv->button_next); (gdb) bt #0

[Bug 1926298] Re: Segfault added in the recent changes

2021-04-27 Thread Dan Bungert
** Tags added: fr-1314 ** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926298 Title: Segfault ad

[Bug 1923110] Re: autopkgtests may fail on slow machines

2021-04-12 Thread Dan Bungert
Thanks Sebastien, great suggestion. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986844 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #986844 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986844 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1923110] Re: autopkgtests may fail on slow machines

2021-04-08 Thread Dan Bungert
Lengthen the "sleep 1" ** Patch added: "ranger-1-1.9.3-3ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ranger/+bug/1923110/+attachment/5485727/+files/ranger-1-1.9.3-3ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1923110] Re: autopkgtests may fail on slow machines

2021-04-08 Thread Dan Bungert
Also observed in Debian, again on armhf: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/ranger.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923110 Title: autopkgtests may

[Bug 1923110] Re: autopkgtests may fail on slow machines

2021-04-08 Thread Dan Bungert
** Tags added: ftbfs update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923110 Title: autopkgtests may fail on slow machines To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1923110] [NEW] autopkgtests may fail on slow machines

2021-04-08 Thread Dan Bungert
Public bug reported: The autopkgtests contain a "sleep 1" prior to the actual checks. However, ranger may not start immediately which can mean that the tests may run too soon. ** Affects: ranger (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: fr-1277 ** Tags added:

[Bug 1912075] Re: Ranger fails to start due to screen dependency

2021-04-08 Thread Dan Bungert
Appears to be fixed upstream in https://github.com/ranger/ranger/commit/1cdcce0a44d031be13009a70e25cc4cf75789eac -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912075 Title: Ranger fails to start

[Bug 1912075] Re: Ranger fails to start due to screen dependency

2021-04-08 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: ranger (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912075 Title: Ranger fails to start due to screen dependency To manage notifications

[Bug 1923066] Re: greenbone-security-assistant ftbfs, trying to access the network

2021-04-08 Thread Dan Bungert
the same. http://bugs.debian.org/986531 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #986531 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986531 ** Changed in: greenbone-security-assistant (Ubuntu) Assignee: Dan Bungert (dbungert) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 1923066] Re: greenbone-security-assistant ftbfs, trying to access the network

2021-04-08 Thread Dan Bungert
My first sbuild of this also fails, but for a different reason. So I can confirm the bug as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923066 Title: greenbone-security-assistant ftbfs,

[Bug 1923066] Re: greenbone-security-assistant ftbfs, trying to access the network

2021-04-08 Thread Dan Bungert
** Tags added: fr-1274 ** Changed in: greenbone-security-assistant (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923066 Ti

[Bug 1920825] Re: FTBFS and autopkgtest failure in Hirsute (badly generated symbols files)

2021-03-30 Thread Dan Bungert
I have run some 40-odd packages that build-depend on dh-exec thru autopkgtest with my modified dh-exec and everything seems fine, including talloc using the version prior to my workaround. If my approach is agreeable I suggest uploading. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1920825] Re: FTBFS and autopkgtest failure in Hirsute (badly generated symbols files)

2021-03-30 Thread Dan Bungert
Here is my proposal: * dh-exec today desires to remove whitespace after a profile, so preserve that * dh-exec also removes trailing whitespace, which might be OK and is current behavior, so preserve that * remove leading whitespace for lines that don't have the profile My perl is rusty (to say

[Bug 1920825] Re: FTBFS and autopkgtest failure in Hirsute (badly generated symbols files)

2021-03-29 Thread Dan Bungert
I appreciate the feedback Matthias. Please see my new patch. I have seen some unexpected behavior from dh-exec, and this patch provides a workaround. Tomorrow I plan to play with dh-exec more and expect to be filing a bug. ** Patch added: "2-2.3.1-2ubuntu1.debdiff"

[Bug 1920825] Re: FTBFS and autopkgtest failure in Hirsute (badly generated symbols files)

2021-03-29 Thread Dan Bungert
Change the generated filename. ** Patch added: "1-2.3.1-2ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/talloc/+bug/1920825/+attachment/5482162/+files/1-2.3.1-2ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1920825] Re: FTBFS and autopkgtest failure in Hirsute (badly generated symbols files)

2021-03-29 Thread Dan Bungert
** Tags added: fr-1247 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920825 Title: FTBFS and autopkgtest failure in Hirsute (badly generated symbols files) To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1821412] Re: "System program problem" report button does nothing

2021-03-23 Thread Dan Bungert
Hi Bryan, I advise against SRUing the current patch to focal,

[Bug 1918456] Re: test failure - invalid conversion on armhf

2021-03-17 Thread Dan Bungert
Thanks for the sponsorship Christian! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918456 Title: test failure - invalid conversion on armhf To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1918456] Re: test failure - invalid conversion on armhf

2021-03-16 Thread Dan Bungert
iniparser (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed ** Changed in: iniparser (Ubuntu) Assignee: Dan Bungert (dbungert) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Bug 1918848] Re: regular users can't run tuptime (regression, autopkgtest failure)

2021-03-12 Thread Dan Bungert
** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918848 Title: regular users can't run tuptime (regression, autopkgtest failure) To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1918848] Re: regular users can't run tuptime (regression, autopkgtest failure)

2021-03-12 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: tuptime (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918848 Title: regular users can't run tuptime (regression, autopkgtest

[Bug 1918848] Re: regular users can't run tuptime (regression, autopkgtest failure)

2021-03-12 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: tuptime (Ubuntu) Assignee: Dan Bungert (dbungert) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918848 Title: regular users can't run tuptime (regress

[Bug 1918848] Re: regular users can't run tuptime (regression, autopkgtest failure)

2021-03-12 Thread Dan Bungert
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918848 Title: regular users can't run tuptime (regression, autopkgtest failure) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1918848] Re: regular users can't run tuptime (regression, autopkgtest failure)

2021-03-12 Thread Dan Bungert
** Patch removed: "lp-1918848.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tuptime/+bug/1918848/+attachment/5476152/+files/lp-1918848.diff ** Patch added: "lp-1918848-v2.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tuptime/+bug/1918848/+attachment/5476156/+files/lp-1918848-v2.diff

[Bug 1918848] Re: regular users can't run tuptime (regression, autopkgtest failure)

2021-03-12 Thread Dan Bungert
tuptime creates the directory for its default db location using adduser. The adduser changes to DIR_MODE=0750 result in the directory not having world readable mode, and then normal users are unable to read the db inside. Attached patch does a chmod 755. ** Patch added: "lp-1918848.diff"

[Bug 1918456] Re: test failure - invalid conversion on armhf

2021-03-12 Thread Dan Bungert
** Tags added: ftbfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918456 Title: test failure - invalid conversion on armhf To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1918848] [NEW] regular users can't run tuptime (regression, autopkgtest failure)

2021-03-11 Thread Dan Bungert
n database file ** Affects: tuptime (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dan Bungert (dbungert) Status: In Progress ** Tags: fr-1207 ** Changed in: tuptime (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) ** Tags added: fr-1207 ** Changed in: tu

[Bug 1918456] Re: test failure - invalid conversion on armhf

2021-03-10 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: iniparser (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918456 Title: test failure - invalid conversion on armhf To manage notifications

[Bug 1918456] [NEW] test failure - invalid conversion on armhf

2021-03-10 Thread Dan Bungert
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/527109834/buildlog_ubuntu-hirsute- armhf.iniparser_4.1-4ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz ** Affects: iniparser (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dan Bungert (dbungert) Status: New ** Tags: fr-1199 ** Changed in: iniparser (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unas

[Bug 1917943] Re: autopkgtest failure - public key file not found (~2% reproduction rate)

2021-03-05 Thread Dan Bungert
** Attachment added: "buster.1.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/monkeysphere/+bug/1917943/+attachment/5473624/+files/buster.1.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1917943] Re: autopkgtest failure - public key file not found (~2% reproduction rate)

2021-03-05 Thread Dan Bungert
** Attachment added: "buster.2.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/monkeysphere/+bug/1917943/+attachment/5473625/+files/buster.2.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1917943] Re: autopkgtest failure - public key file not found (~2% reproduction rate)

2021-03-05 Thread Dan Bungert
** Attachment added: "hirsute.2.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/monkeysphere/+bug/1917943/+attachment/5473623/+files/hirsute.2.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1917943] [NEW] autopkgtest failure - public key file not found (~2% reproduction rate)

2021-03-05 Thread Dan Bungert
Public bug reported: I looped autopkgtest targeting current hirsute and buster, and was occasionally able to see failures like this: debug1: trying public key file /tmp/autopkgtest.Kh7svp/build.gYC/src/tests/tmp/ms.Rte/authorized_keys/ubuntu debug1: Could not open authorized keys

[Bug 1915866] Re: non-blocking items from MIR of iniparser: tests, 1 byte stack overflow

2021-03-02 Thread Dan Bungert
This patch addresses both items. ** Summary changed: - build does not run tests in test/ directory + non-blocking items from MIR of iniparser: tests, 1 byte stack overflow ** Description changed: + The following changes were requested as part of the MIR of libiniparser: + + 1) build does not

[Bug 1913321] Re: [MIR] iniparser (dependency of mtd-utils)

2021-03-01 Thread Dan Bungert
Here is a v2 version which doesn't rely on debian/rules override. ** Patch added: "lp1915866+lp1913321-v2.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iniparser/+bug/1913321/+attachment/5471523/+files/lp1915866+lp1913321-v2.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1913321] Re: [MIR] iniparser (dependency of mtd-utils)

2021-02-26 Thread Dan Bungert
Here is a debdiff incorporating https://github.com/ndevilla/iniparser/commit/2412f165bcfde4ad8e3426fd59f2a920492b8c19 and the previous LP: #1915866 test build patch. ** Patch added: "lp1915866+lp1913321.patch"

[Bug 1915866] Re: build does not run tests in test/ directory

2021-02-26 Thread Dan Bungert
Security team has provided feedback, indeed there is a patch to merge. Let's not merge this one yet, and instead get this + the security patch in one go. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1913321] Re: [MIR] iniparser (dependency of mtd-utils)

2021-02-18 Thread Dan Bungert
Patch attached to LP:#1915866 to address issue with package tests. I'm holding off on an attempt to merge that patch on LP:#1915866 just yet as I expect that the security team will have suggestions that we will want to implement. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1915866] Re: build does not run tests in test/ directory

2021-02-18 Thread Dan Bungert
On analysis of this issue, I found that the upstream tests are being run - it's just that failures go unnoticed due to the test runner unconditionally returning exit code 0, pass or fail. By enhancing this runner to return exit code 1 upon test failure, we see the test failure log without having

[Bug 1915558] Re: Please merge 1.2.2-2

2021-02-18 Thread Dan Bungert
Thanks for linking to the MR and reviewing it, Julian. Is there anything else that is needed? ** Changed in: irssi (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) ** Changed in: irssi (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 1915866] Re: build does not run tests in test/ directory

2021-02-17 Thread Dan Bungert
** Tags added: fr-1142 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915866 Title: build does not run tests in test/ directory To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1915866] Re: build does not run tests in test/ directory

2021-02-16 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: iniparser (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915866 Title: build does not run tests in test/ direct

[Bug 1915558] [NEW] Please merge 1.2.2-2

2021-02-12 Thread Dan Bungert
Public bug reported: tracking bug ** Affects: irssi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: fr-1125 ** Tags added: fr-1125 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1913321] Re: [MIR] iniparser (dependency of mtd-utils)

2021-02-11 Thread Dan Bungert
ddstreet: if you need any further info or if anything is missing please let me know. Per the MIR IRC meeting it looks like there is a partial concern that the library may be redundant, albeit with a different API. Any further feedback? -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1706168] Re: dialog shouldn't be display if Command doesn't exist

2021-02-02 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1706168 Title: dialog shouldn't be display if Command doesn't exist To

[Bug 1706168] Re: dialog shouldn't be display if Command doesn't exist

2021-02-01 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1706168 Title: dialog shouldn't be display if Comm

[Bug 1706168] Re: dialog shouldn't be display if Command doesn't exist

2021-02-01 Thread Dan Bungert
** Tags added: fr-248 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1706168 Title: dialog shouldn't be display if Command doesn't exist To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1913321] Re: [MIR] iniparser (dependency of mtd-utils)

2021-01-29 Thread Dan Bungert
** Description changed: [MIR] iniparser (dependency of mtd-utils) + + + [Availability] + ✓ The package is in universe. + + [Rationale] + ✓ The package is a new build dependency of a package that we already + support (mtd-utils). + + [Security] + ✓ No CVEs + ✓ No openwall + ✓ No security

<    1   2   3   4   5   6