[Bug 1873561] Re: smbclient //192.168.178.1/share1 fails on SMB1 resource

2020-04-19 Thread Dirk Heumann via ubuntu-bugs
Thanks a lot smbclient --user=userName1 --option='client min protocol=nt1' //192.168.178.1/share1 worked ('NT1' = 'nt1' is non case sensitive). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873561

[Bug 1873561] Re: smbclient //192.168.178.1/share1 fails on SMB1 resource

2020-04-18 Thread Dirk Heumann via ubuntu-bugs
** Attachment added: "Ubuntu 19.10: Successful command: smbclient --debuglevel=10 --user=ftpuser //192.168.178.1/share1" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1873561/+attachment/5356440/+files/Ubuntu-19.10-smbclient--debuglevel--user--IP--smb1-share1.log -- You received this

[Bug 1873561] [NEW] smbclient //192.168.178.1/share1 fails on SMB1 resource

2020-04-18 Thread Dirk Heumann via ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported: $ smbclient --user=ftpuser //192.168.178.1/share1 protocol negotiation failed: NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_DISCONNECTED Remvark, with SMB2 resources, the command runs O.K. Remark: "I also coult not mount the SMB1 drives with "gio mount smb:", what works easily with SMB2 drives. I

[Bug 1873561] Re: smbclient //192.168.178.1/share1 fails on SMB1 resource

2020-04-18 Thread Dirk Heumann via ubuntu-bugs
** Attachment added: "Ubuntu 20.04: Failed command: smbclient --debuglevel=10 --user=ftpuser //192.168.178.1/share1" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1873561/+attachment/5356439/+files/Ubuntu-20.04-smbclient--debuglevel--user--IP--smb1-share1.log -- You received this bug

[Bug 1872286] Re: gio - cifs mount smb not possible "Location is not mountable"

2020-04-17 Thread Dirk Heumann via ubuntu-bugs
I just saw, that it is not Ubuntu 20.04 beta, it is the real Ubuntu 20.04 now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872286 Title: gio - cifs mount smb not possible "Location is not

[Bug 1872286] Re: gio - cifs mount smb not possible "Location is not mountable"

2020-04-17 Thread Dirk Heumann via ubuntu-bugs
Again: gvfs-backends is installed (it was removed without my knowledge during the update from Ubuntu 19.10 to 20.04 beta). Perhaps you should not install a beta version on a productive system ;-) When I want to mount the drive as in Ubuntu 19.10, I get: $ gio mount

[Bug 1872286] Re: gio - cifs mount smb not possible "Location is not mountable"

2020-04-14 Thread Dirk Heumann via ubuntu-bugs
Remark: In Ubuntu 19.04, if the user/domain/password is not piped, `gio mount` requests the `user/domain/password`: `$ gio mount smb://192.168.178.1/Fritz7490` `Password required for share fritz7490 on 192.168.178.1 `User [SessionUserName]: NewUserIfDifferent `Domain [WORKGROUP]:

[Bug 1872286] Re: gio - cifs mount smb not possible "Location is not mountable"

2020-04-14 Thread Dirk Heumann via ubuntu-bugs
I updated my Ubuntu 19.10 laptop with "sudo update-manager -d" to 20.04 beta. I always mount a small local drive in my network, because I have there my private git repo, which is then easily available to my laptops and to may raspberries. I did not delete the package on my own, but there were

[Bug 1872286] Re: gio - cifs mount smb not possible "Location is not mountable"

2020-04-14 Thread Dirk Heumann via ubuntu-bugs
After installing package `gvfs-backends` and reboot, I got the follow error: `$ gio mount smb://192.168.178.1/PathName` `gio: smb://192.168.178.1/PathName/: Failed to mount Windows share: Software caused connection abort` `gvfsd-fuse on /run/user/1000/gvfs type fuse.gvfsd-fuse

[Bug 1872286] Re: gio - cifs mount smb not possible "Location is not mountable"

2020-04-14 Thread Dirk Heumann via ubuntu-bugs
I found out, that I had to install the package `gvfs-backends` to get `gvfsd-smb`: `$ find /usr -name 'gvfsd-smb' -exec ls -l '{}' \; 2>/dev/null` `-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 59704 Mär 11 17:23 /usr/libexec/gvfsd-smb` `lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Mär 11 17:23 /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-smb ->

[Bug 1872286] Re: gio - cifs mount smb not possible "Location is not mountable"

2020-04-14 Thread Dirk Heumann via ubuntu-bugs
Comments on https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2090 showed, that there is this file `/usr/share/gvfs/mounts/smb.mount` in Ubuntu 19.10, which is not there in Ubuntu 20.04 beta. Inside of this file, there was a reference to the file `/usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-smb`. Also a file

[Bug 1872286] Re: gio - cifs mount smb not possible "Location is not mountable"

2020-04-13 Thread Dirk Heumann via ubuntu-bugs
Sorry, should put my reading glasses on, 20:04beta's version 2.64.1-1 is newer than 19.10's version 2.62.4-1. I wished, I could correct messages here, unless someone else is on the top ;-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1872286] Re: gio - cifs mount smb not possible "Location is not mountable"

2020-04-13 Thread Dirk Heumann via ubuntu-bugs
Checked the (working) Ubuntu 19.04 package: $ apt-cache policy libglib2.0-bin libglib2.0-bin: Installed: 2.62.4-1~ubuntu19.10.2 Candidate: 2.62.4-1~ubuntu19.10.2 Version table: *** 2.62.4-1~ubuntu19.10.2 500 500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu eoan-updates/main amd64 Packages

[Bug 1872286] Re: gio - cifs mount smb not possible "Location is not mountable"

2020-04-13 Thread Dirk Heumann via ubuntu-bugs
Opened [https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2090](https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2090) as requested, with additional comments that it works in Ubuntu 19.10 up to kernel 5.6.3 (I use both Ubuntu and newest linux kernel). ** Bug watch added:

[Bug 1872286] [NEW] gio - cifs mount smb not possible "Location is not mountable"

2020-04-12 Thread Dirk Heumann via ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported: 1) Release $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu Focal Fossa (development branch) Release:20.04 2) Package $ apt-cache policy libglib2.0-bin libglib2.0-bin: Installed: 2.64.1-1 Candidate: 2.64.1-1 Version table: *** 2.64.1-1 500 500

[Bug 1678308] Re: lxterminal crashed with SIGSEGV from pcmanfm

2017-04-01 Thread Dirk Heumann
I solved the problem, when I replaced inside of ~/.config/libfm/libfm.conf the line terminal=lxsession-default-terminal %s by terminal=lxterminal %s . Thank you very much Walter! Your questions did push me to dig much deeper and to solve the problem in the end. Inside of Unity I got

[Bug 1678308] Re: lxterminal crashed with SIGSEGV from pcmanfm

2017-04-01 Thread Dirk Heumann
After I tried "lubuntu" instead of 'lxde" as desktop manager, all worked like expected. Then I tried it from pcmanfm within 'xfce', 'ubuntu', which failed too. Starting via "Tools"-->"Run a Command in Current Folder..." worked always. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1678308] Re: lxterminal crashed with SIGSEGV from pcmanfm

2017-04-01 Thread Dirk Heumann
I started "lxterminal &" from the terminal in the USB path /media/dirk/32GB_USB3_Dirk successfully, and this works from everywhere. Trying to start lxterminal from another path within "pcmanfm" did not work too from any path, so it is not the USB device. When I did this on another computer

[Bug 1678308] [NEW] lxterminal crashed with SIGSEGV from pcmanfm

2017-03-31 Thread Dirk Heumann
Public bug reported: Tried to press F4 in pcmanfm showing an USB stick path. No lxterminal started, it crashed. The same happened when I tried to start a terminal via the menu "Tools"-->"Open current folder in Terminal F4" 1) $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu Zesty Zapus

[Bug 1550779] Re: [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun - Xorg glitches

2016-05-19 Thread Dirk Heumann
Hi all, I was bugged by this both in Ubuntu 16.04 (any 4.4 kernel after release) and in ArchLinUX with all actual 4.5 kernels. My solution was to take the 4.6 kernel on ArchLinUX (testing repository), after which I was cured from all difficulties. If you use VirtualBox with a new 4.4/4.5

Re: [Bug 576648] Re: package nvidia-* failed to install/upgrade: nvidia-* kernel module failed to build (Unable to determine the target kernel version.)

2011-10-03 Thread Dirk Heumann
Hi Daniel, I could install the NVidia driver after you obviously made some updates. I installed 173 a couple of days ago first and recommended drivers after new updates later. I had the impression that it was important to install the old drivers first. I still have a test partition left if you

[Bug 859847] Re: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build

2011-09-26 Thread Dirk Heumann
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859847 Title: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 859847] Re: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build

2011-09-26 Thread Dirk Heumann
Tried after fresh install of lubuntu 11.10 beta 2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859847 Title: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build To

[Bug 859863] [NEW] nvidia-current-updates 280.13-0ubuntu3: nvidia-current-updates kernel module failed to build

2011-09-26 Thread Dirk Heumann
Public bug reported: After fresh install of lubuntu 11.10 beta 2 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: nvidia-current-updates 280.13-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-11.18-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu1 Architecture:

[Bug 859863] Re: nvidia-current-updates 280.13-0ubuntu3: nvidia-current-updates kernel module failed to build

2011-09-26 Thread Dirk Heumann
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859863 Title: nvidia-current-updates 280.13-0ubuntu3: nvidia-current-updates kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 859870] [NEW] nvidia-current 280.13-0ubuntu3: nvidia-current kernel module failed to build

2011-09-26 Thread Dirk Heumann
Public bug reported: Obviously none of the current NVidia drivers (I tried the second and third or four options) did install on my Dell Inspiron 1420 laptop. I am using this laptop since latest beginning of 2008 with Ubuntu 64 and never got any real problem so far (third bug). ProblemType:

[Bug 859870] Re: nvidia-current 280.13-0ubuntu3: nvidia-current kernel module failed to build

2011-09-26 Thread Dirk Heumann
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859870 Title: nvidia-current 280.13-0ubuntu3: nvidia-current kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 859847] [NEW] virtualbox-dkms 4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build

2011-09-26 Thread Dirk Heumann
Public bug reported: I cannot install virtualbox-dkms under lubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric). ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-11.18-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: