[Bug 2070095] Re: apt_news.py download forced unsandboxed

2024-07-04 Thread Dominic Raferd
# pro collect-logs [info] A new version is available: 32.3.1~24.04 Please run: sudo apt install ubuntu-pro-client to get the latest bug fixes and new features. # ls -hal /run/ubuntu-advantage/ total 8.0K drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 100 Jul 4 12:28 . drwxr-xr-x 36 root root 1.2K Jul 4 12:27 ..

[Bug 2070095] Re: apt_news.py download forced unsandboxed

2024-06-22 Thread Dominic Raferd
I now think this relates to ubuntu-advantage-tools and/or ubuntu pro- client. I do not have ubuntu-advantage-tools installed but I do have ubuntu-pro-client and I have directory /etc/ubuntu-advantage which contains uaclient.conf. ** Package changed: ubuntu => ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) --

[Bug 2070095] [NEW] apt_news.py download forced unsandboxed

2024-06-22 Thread Dominic Raferd
Public bug reported: I am not sure which package this relates to, but after a recent upgrade from Ubuntu 22.04 to 24.04 LTS I have started seeing messages in syslog like this: 17:29:03 python3[89]: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/apt_news.py:207: Warning: W:Download is performed

[Bug 2069505] [NEW] package sa-compile 4.0.0-8ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: installed sa-compile package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2

2024-06-15 Thread Dominic Raferd
Public bug reported: bug on upgrading from 22.04 to 24.04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: sa-compile 4.0.0-8ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-112.122-generic 5.15.152 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-112-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64

[Bug 2056153] Re: Removing the systemd-resolved package breaks DNSSEC validation

2024-06-09 Thread Dominic
This bug continues into Noble. I continue to add "options edns0 trust- ad" to /etc/resolv.conf after removing systemd-resolved, but it would be nice not having to do so. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-08 Thread Dominic
Postfix already has a configuration page for SPF [0], albeit requiring a package from universe. So although removing the SPF snippet from Exim could be an option in the short-term, I do think in the long-term Ubuntu's SPF support for Exim should be somewhat equivalent to that of Postfix's. Adding

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-06 Thread Dominic
Option three would be to remove the spf section completely until a non- broken sustainable solution is implemented, especially if libspf2 is going to take some time to implement. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-04 Thread Dominic
Thank you, I would appreciate you reiterating the case for libspf2. Aside from the fact that this implementation is looking (recurrently) fragile, this Ubuntu delta, disabled by default, is probably not getting enough attention to spot bugs. This bug has been open for three months and only one

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Dominic
It was floated before but it's worth raising again. What are the chances of bringing libspf2 to main and falling back into line with Debian? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Dominic
No, I was not invoking bash, I was using the code I quoted previously and testing the scenarios at port 25. An empty $sender_address variable would create a missing argument and likely break spfquery.mail-spf-perl, I haven't tested that scenario yet. $sender_host_address should always be present

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Dominic
Good find, I am still running my ${quote:}-less version at the moment so I was able to test the scenarios in that bug report. All three of the following senders were correctly rejected as spf fail by my server (example.com hard fails all senders in its spf record): MAIL FROM: "$PWD"@example.com

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-01 Thread Dominic
Thinking more about this, wouldn't invoking /bin/bash actually increase the attack potential, by allowing for backticks and $() to execute via user-supplied data? Also, it's not clear to me that ${quote} escapes backticks or $(). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2056443] Re: CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check fails if inbound IP address is IPv6

2024-05-31 Thread Dominic
Closing this, as this will be fixed by bug #2056372 ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056443 Title: CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-30 Thread Dominic
I agree, I also do not know the potential risks of removing ${quote:} from tainted variables, so this needs further research before implementation. Or we go with yours. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2049977] Re: journalctl --follow --grep lists lines in wrong order

2024-05-30 Thread Dominic
It was a problem in mantic, fixed in noble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049977 Title: journalctl --follow --grep lists lines in wrong order To manage notifications about this

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-30 Thread Dominic
Hi Mitchell, Your version works for me as well. In the interim I have been successfully using the following configuration. Would this be potentially useful, or are there issues with removing ${quote:} from --ip and --identity? condition = ${run{/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl \

[Bug 2067057] Re: Unattended-upgrades order of restart caused failure to bind address

2024-05-24 Thread Dominic
Contents of unattended-upgrades log, to confirm unattended-upgrades initiated the updates: 2024-05-24 06:27:37,661 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script 2024-05-24 06:27:37,662 INFO Allowed origins are: o=Ubuntu,a=noble, o=Ubuntu,a=noble-security, o=UbuntuESMApps,a=noble-apps-security,

[Bug 2067057] [NEW] Unattended-upgrades order of restart caused failure to bind address

2024-05-24 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: This morning, nginx wan't working, so I checked the journal. It appears an overnight unattended-upgrades restarted a lot of services, including systemd-networkd and nginx. Logs pasted at the end, I am running Ubuntu 24.04. I bind nginx to specific IP addresses, because

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-17 Thread Dominic
Re-marking as new since I've supplied all requested information. ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title:

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-06 Thread Dominic
(and comment #6) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-06 Thread Dominic
No, you should be seeing a header. Are the steps you followed the same as that which I wrote in comment #5 of this report? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-06 Thread Dominic
No errors in /var/log/exim4/mainlog, just normal mail flow logs. I suspect some sort of error was introduced in the code for the #1998678 fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-04 Thread Dominic
Possibly related to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1998678 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-03 Thread Dominic
It was a clean install of Noble, for some reason the spf check always returns "none". It is very easily reproducible, as per my comment #5. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-02 Thread Dominic
Still an issue in noble / 24.04. "Received-SPF: none" is reported in the headers of received mail for senders known to have an spf record configured. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-02 Thread Dominic
Also, this should not be marked as "incomplete" as I have supplied all the required information. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-15 Thread Dominic
I get the correct result when running spfquery.mail-spf-perl manually. $ /usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl --ip 40.92.113.65 --scope mfrom --identity exam...@outlook.com pass outlook.com: Sender is authorized to use 'exam...@outlook.com' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-13 Thread Dominic
According to the exim4 changelog, the spf logic was modified in Aug 2023. exim4 (4.96-17ubuntu1) mantic; urgency=medium * Merge with Debian unstable (LP: #2030098). Remaining changes: - Disable external SPF support to avoid Build-Depends on libspf2-dev (only available in universe).

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-13 Thread Dominic
I'm using exim4-daemon-heavy. $ apt list --installed | grep exim4 WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in scripts. exim4-base/mantic-updates,mantic-security,now 4.96-17ubuntu2.2 amd64 [installed,automatic] exim4-config/mantic-updates,mantic-security,now

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-12 Thread Dominic
Also: `update-exim4.conf` and restart exim before sending mail to yourself. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-12 Thread Dominic
exim4.conf.template is completely unmodified from stock mantic. Bug can be replicated by: 1. Installing mantic 2. Installing exim4 and spf-tools-perl 3. `dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config` and make it accept mail 4. Adding CHECK_RCPT_SPF = true to /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.localmacros 5. Sending

[Bug 2056443] Re: CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check fails if inbound IP address is IPv6

2024-03-11 Thread Dominic
Quite possibly related, although the way the error manifests is different. If the other bug is fixed, then it's very possible this one will be too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-11 Thread Dominic
Hi Mitchell, I am setting CHECK_RCPT_SPF = true in /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.localmacros where local macros are typically set. I have run `update-exim4.conf` and `systemctl restart exim4`. Then I send myself an email from an outlook.com account, which has SPF enabled, and the headers report:

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-07 Thread Dominic
Note: this bug relates to inbound IPv4 addresses. IPv6 addresses are affected by a separate bug: #2056443 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with

[Bug 2056443] [NEW] CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check fails if inbound IP address is IPv6

2024-03-07 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: On mantic, when CHECK_RCPT_SPF = true and spf-tools-perl is installed, Exim4 logs an error and fails the SPF check if the inbound IP address is IPv6: 2024-03-07 11:58:35 H=mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com [2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c] Warning: Unexpected error in SPF check. ** Affects:

[Bug 2056372] [NEW] Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-06 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: As I understand it, enabling SPF validation in Exim4 simply requires setting CHECK_RCPT_SPF to true and installing the spf-tools-perl package. However, in mantic, every email has this header, regardless of whether the sender's domain has an SPF TXT record set: Received-SPF:

[Bug 2056153] [NEW] Removing the systemd-resolved package breaks DNSSEC validation

2024-03-05 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: Removing the systemd-resolved package breaks glibc DNSSEC validation, because it removes an existing line from the new /etc/resolv.conf file. This line should be retained so that packages like Exim can continue to use the AD bit after systemd-resolved is removed.

[Bug 1823171] Re: systemd-resolve hides DS records in explicit queries

2024-02-25 Thread Dominic
DNSSEC isn't required to query a DS record. The reason your query succeeded after you enabled DNSSEC is because systemd-resolved caches it internally as a result of the DNSSEC lookup. Once the DS query is cached, the bug will not manifest. Another way to cache it is: ubuntu@server:~$ dig

[Bug 1977764] [NEW] kernel modules "zstd" and "z3fold" missing.

2022-06-06 Thread Dominic Parry
Public bug reported: The modules "zstd" and "z3fold" are missing despite being configured for zswap in "/boot/firmware/cmdline.txt." Messages appear on boot display that state they do not exist and so instead use compressor "lzo" and pool "zbud". Ubuntu version is 22.04 LTS flashed from the

[Bug 1974178] Re: Missing vhost_vsock kernel module in 5.15.0

2022-05-19 Thread Dominic Schwarz
"sudo apt install linux-modules-extra-raspi" worked and installed the missing module. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974178 Title: Missing vhost_vsock kernel module in

[Bug 1974178] [NEW] Missing vhost_vsock kernel module in 5.15.0

2022-05-19 Thread Dominic Schwarz
Public bug reported: Hey All, I am new to the container, lxc, lxd stuff and I am at the end of my knowledge. I have a fresh setup with a Raspberry PI 4 installed with Ubuntu 22.04 arm64. So far everything works fine for containers but I can't get any vm to launch. >    ~  lxc launch

[Bug 1618041] Re: Cannot login to Ubuntu One Single Sign-On Account to install Snaps

2022-02-17 Thread Dominic Bufton
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1616943 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616943 same here on brand new 20.04 LTS running in VM on HyoerV SSO and Ubuntu One accounts work fine on webs, but Livepatch setup lets me enter SSO initally, then prompts for local admin, before coming back to

[Bug 1946833] Re: Merge bind9 from Debian unstable for 22.04

2022-02-10 Thread Dominic
It would be ideal if 9.18 could be included before the feature freeze. Any news? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946833 Title: Merge bind9 from Debian unstable for 22.04 To manage

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2022-01-17 Thread Dominic Pfromm
on 22.04 Daily Live from today everything works out of the Box on ASUS C200 with Bay Trail -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871306 Title: [SRU] No sound from internal card

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-11-04 Thread Dominic Pfromm
Now I changed with my main Setup to 21.10 and after setting snd_intel_dspcfg.dsp_driver=2 the Sound is Pitched down and too slow. When I try to install firmware-sof-signed dpkg terminates with the error saying that the sof files are already installed by linux-firmware, but the required file

[Bug 1946909] Re: Merge unbound from Debian unstable for 22.04

2021-10-23 Thread Dominic
Please ensure that whatever happens, Unbound on Ubuntu continues to be compiled with the nghttp2 library. Unbound on Debian is currently not compiled with nghttp2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-19 Thread Dominic Pfromm
In my readings without the snd_intel_dspcfg.dsp_driver=2 the system uses sof mode which requires the package firmware-sof-signed. But I can not do any testing about that from live system so I will do when I changed permanent to 21.10 and provide the results. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-19 Thread Dominic Pfromm
** Attachment added: "alsainfo-inteldsp2.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm-conf/+bug/1871306/+attachment/5534257/+files/alsainfo-inteldsp2.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-19 Thread Dominic Pfromm
** Attachment added: "dmesg-inteldsp2.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm-conf/+bug/1871306/+attachment/5534256/+files/dmesg-inteldsp2.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-19 Thread Dominic Pfromm
Wow this solves the problem. Thanks for your fast and competent help. For interest I will provide dmesg and alsainfo from 21.10 with dsp2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871306

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-19 Thread Dominic Pfromm
** Attachment added: "dmesg.21.04.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm-conf/+bug/1871306/+attachment/5534213/+files/dmesg.21.04.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-19 Thread Dominic Pfromm
** Attachment added: "dmesg.21.10.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm-conf/+bug/1871306/+attachment/5534214/+files/dmesg.21.10.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-19 Thread Dominic Pfromm
Hey, thanks for your fast reply. When I do dmesg | grep 'journal -b0' there is no result, or did I get something wrong? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871306 Title: [SRU] No

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-18 Thread Dominic Pfromm
Issue was fixed on Asus Chromebook C200 with Ubuntu 21.04. But on Ubuntu 21.10 the Card is not detected anymore. Alsainfo 20.04:https://pastebin.com/raw/wXsT6w1r Alsainfo 21.10 https://pastebin.com/raw/SWZNJ4AT -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-18 Thread Dominic Pfromm
Issue has been fixed with 21.04 out of the Box, but is present again on 21.10. Chromebook C200. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871306 Title: [SRU] No sound from internal

[Bug 1782709] Re: Updating systemd kills network on bionic

2021-08-30 Thread Dominic Raferd
I changed my networking setup to use netplan and the problem disappeared. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782709 Title: Updating systemd kills network on bionic To manage

[Bug 1927877] Re: DoH support is disabled

2021-06-21 Thread Dominic
The Debian MR has still not been actioned. Can we now consider enabling DoH support in Ubuntu's Unbound package? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927877 Title: DoH support is disabled

[Bug 1930150] [NEW] package libpython3.9-minimal 3.9.5-1+focal1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3.9/typing.py', which is also in package libpython3.9-stdlib:amd64 3.9.5

2021-05-30 Thread Dominic Davis-Foster
Public bug reported: This was encountered during an automated install of updates this morning. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: libpython3.9-minimal 3.9.5-1+focal1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-50.56~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18 Uname: Linux 5.8.0-50-generic x86_64

[Bug 1927877] Re: DoH support is disabled

2021-05-12 Thread Dominic
I would support this, DNS-over-HTTPS is increasing in usage and its omission is frustrating. I had to compile from source on Hirsute to enable it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927877

[Bug 1927877] Re: DoH support is disabled

2021-05-10 Thread Dominic
Thanks, I mostly copied the bug report from the Debian package. Is there someone here that can nudge the package managers at Debian? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927877 Title: DoH

[Bug 1927877] [NEW] DoH support is disabled

2021-05-09 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: NLnetLabs has added DNS-over-HTTPS support to Unbound as of release 1.12.0. The current Ubuntu package delivering this release however has no DoH support. For DoH to work, Unbound simply would need to be compiled with the nghttp2 library. ** Affects: unbound (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1923264] Re: request-tracker4 is incompatible with mysql-server-8.0

2021-04-09 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #986707 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986707 ** Also affects: request-tracker4 (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986707 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug

[Bug 1803391] Re: Systemd update installation hangs in unattended-upgrades InstallOnShutdown mode

2021-01-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
my problem is I think likely better covered by https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1782709 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1803391 Title: Systemd update installation

[Bug 1803391] Re: Systemd update installation hangs in unattended-upgrades InstallOnShutdown mode

2021-01-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
TTFN: To add to (and correct) my earlier comments: after the updating shown there, the machine had to be rebooted manually. Checking /var/log/apt/term.log it appears that the upgrade did complete successfully: Log started: 2021-01-07 13:28:19 (Reading database ... 151099 files and directories

[Bug 1803391] Re: Systemd update installation hangs in unattended-upgrades InstallOnShutdown mode

2021-01-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
I have this problem with Ubuntu 18.04 system set up with 'encrypted LVM' (standard Ubuntu recipe as per the alternate installer). Whenever there is systemd upgrade it hangs (whole machine crashes - other logins not possible) and has to be manually rebooted (which is not ideal as the machine is

[Bug 1903914] [NEW] Launching Oracle Sql Developer crashes due to openjdk

2020-11-11 Thread Dominic Welter
be processed with "/usr/share/apport/apport %p %s %c %d %P %E" (or dumping to /home/dominic/Downloads/sqldeveloper/sqldeveloper/bin/core.47548) # ** Affects: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Launching Oracle Sql Developer

[Bug 1902401] [NEW] touchpad not working

2020-10-31 Thread Dominic Trybus
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-52.57-generic 5.4.65 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-52-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.10 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: dominic1211 F pulseaudio CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME

[Bug 1871794] Re: [Bluetooth] No audio output/input in HSP/HFP mode

2020-10-01 Thread Dominic Swaine
Affected by this also. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871794 Title: [Bluetooth] No audio output/input in HSP/HFP mode To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1892569] [NEW] Font scaling not working correctly 20.04

2020-08-22 Thread dominic
Public bug reported: During log in screen and after all text on desktop is enlarged. (no accessibility settings are turned on) During log in, text scaling can be reset by turning on and off the text scaling accessibility option, however scaling after login is still messed up. After log in,

[Bug 1875950] Re: rsyslog log files failing to rotate

2020-05-02 Thread Dominic
VM reinstalled, logs are rotating now. ** Changed in: logrotate (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875950 Title: rsyslog log files failing to

[Bug 1875950] Re: rsyslog log files failing to rotate

2020-04-29 Thread Dominic
My mistake, error does not appear with: sudo logrotate -d /etc/logrotate.conf For some reason my logs are not being rotated though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875950 Title:

[Bug 1875950] [NEW] rsyslog log files failing to rotate

2020-04-29 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: In focal, /etc/logrotate.conf contains: su root adm logrotate does not rotate files in /var/log: error: skipping "/var/log/syslog" because parent directory has insecure permissions (It's world writable or writable by group which is not "root") Set "su" directive

[Bug 1875495] [NEW] Additional notifications that there are updates available to install appear on screen even if previous notifications have not been dismissed,

2020-04-27 Thread Dominic Davis-Foster
Public bug reported: Having left my computer logged in but locked for a few days, I came back to it to find 9 dialog boxes notifying me that there are new updates to install. I would have expected a new dialog to only appear if there is not already a dialog present on the screen, otherwise a lot

[Bug 1853585] Re: Intel graphics card not detected and reverts to llvmpipe

2019-11-22 Thread Dominic Jaques
** Summary changed: - Intel graphics card not detected, reverts to llvmpipe + Intel graphics card not detected and reverts to llvmpipe ** Description changed: [Impact] Ubuntu 18.04 install (also seen on 16) is unable to detect integrated Intel graphics card (Intel Iris Plus). Using a Dell

[Bug 1853585] [NEW] Intel graphics card not detected, reverts to llvmpipe

2019-11-22 Thread Dominic Jaques
Public bug reported: [Impact] Ubuntu 18.04 install (also seen on 16) is unable to detect integrated Intel graphics card (Intel Iris Plus). Using a Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 7390 the machine is unable to detect attached monitors, change resolutions, or adjust brightness. [Information] There is a dual

[Bug 1853585] Re: Intel graphics card not detected, reverts to llvmpipe

2019-11-22 Thread Dominic Jaques
Related bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/1768610 Possible duplicate, but unclear: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1772366 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1767468] Re: Upgrade from 16.04 to 18.04, then uninstalling unity disables hardware acceleration

2019-11-22 Thread Dominic Jaques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1768610 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768610 I have witnessed a _related_ issue but it does not appear to be precisely the same problem. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1853585 -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1853466] [NEW] I have installed the xserver-xorg-video-intel package but cannot detect monitor

2019-11-21 Thread Dominic Jaques
Public bug reported: The monitor U2414H is not detected by Ubuntu, the graphics card displayed in settings is llvmpipe (LLVM 8.0, 256 bits). I believe it should be "Intel Iris Plus Graphics", which is what shows up in Windows Device Manager (my device is set up to dual boot). ProblemType: Bug

[Bug 1849298] Re: unattended-upgrade is checking o=UbuntuESM, a=eoan-security when disabled in config

2019-10-22 Thread Dominic
I just realised it's enabled by /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/51ubuntu-advantage- esm. Closing bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849298 Title: unattended-upgrade is checking

[Bug 1849298] Re: unattended-upgrade is checking o=UbuntuESM, a=eoan-security when disabled in config

2019-10-22 Thread Dominic
Not sure I can close the bug. Nevertheless it's confusing to have this configuration in two places. Maybe deserves a review. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849298 Title:

[Bug 1849298] [NEW] unattended-upgrade is checking o=UbuntuESM, a=eoan-security when disabled in config

2019-10-22 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: My /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades file looks like this: Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins { "${distro_id}:${distro_codename}"; "${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-security"; // Extended Security Maintenance; doesn't necessarily exist for

[Bug 1822351] Re: Nautilus does not open after updating to 19.04

2019-09-24 Thread Dominic Mayers via ubuntu-bugs
Also in case that helps, I experience the same bug. In addition, #2 did not work for me. Immediately after executing "tracker reset -e" on a shell, nautilus shows instantly after a click, but the problem comes back at the next reboot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1785573] Re: incrontab changes its contents, and fails, under certain conditions

2019-09-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
These points are not relevant here and are old: some of them are fixed in version 0.12. If the OP still has concerns they should be taken up with the incron maintainer at https://github.com/ar-/incron. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1819977] Re: razor2 had unknown error during get_server_info

2019-03-19 Thread Dominic Raferd
Great workaround tip thanks @strredwolf. You can use either 208.83.137.117 or 208.83.137.118, the current problem is with 208.83.139.205. To test, set the ip you want to test in /etc/hosts. Example: 208.83.139.205 discovery.razor.cloudmark.com Then: # echo "test" | spamassassin -D razor2 2>&1 |

[Bug 1817466] Re: Ram usage increases gradually until it reaches 100% and a hard reset is needed.

2019-03-05 Thread Dominic
After switching back to gdm3 I have checked RAM usage repeatedly and the problem has not recurred. There is a gradual increase in RAM usage, but it is no longer enough to freeze the display. As a hypothesis, is it possible that something about enabling lightdm could have solved the problem even

Re: [Bug 1817466] Re: Ram usage increases gradually until it reaches 100% and a hard reset is needed.

2019-02-24 Thread Dominic
I have switched to lightdm to avoid the bug, I will switch back this evening to cause the problem again, RAM usage was measured by System Monitor, CPU usage was not high, only RAM usage which slowly increased until the display froze. The issue has been reported by multiple users in the forum (see

[Bug 1817466] [NEW] Ram usage increases gradually until it reaches 100% and a hard reset is needed.

2019-02-24 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: Running Ubuntu 18.04 on Dell Latitude-E5420 with 3.7 GB RAM Gnome 3.28.2. Updated from Ubuntu 16.04. Applications freeze after about an hour continuous use, while applications are running RAM use increases gradually typically from about 55% to 100%. The solution is to

[Bug 1802334] Re: update tesseract-ocr to 4.0.0 stable

2019-02-04 Thread Dominic Raferd
Confirm that this needs doing, the beta version installed in Bionic (18.04) is flawed, for instance running for orientation (--psm 0) gives segmentation fault. Installing stable 4.0.0 (using ppa https://launchpad.net/~alex-p/+archive/ubuntu/tesseract-ocr) gets rid of this problem. -- You

[Bug 1812366] [NEW] outdated version, please update

2019-01-18 Thread Dominic Raferd
Public bug reported: This version (0.23.0-1) is now outdated and I believe this is why I receive warning mails from letsencrypt like this: Hello, **Action is required to prevent your Let's Encrypt certificate renewals from breaking.** Your Let’s Encrypt client used ACME TLS-SNI-01 domain

[Bug 1739936] Re: Screen flickering on Razer Blade Stealth (Late 2017) - [drm:intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun?

2018-12-01 Thread Dominic Lemire via ubuntu-bugs
I'm also on Stealth late 2016 (QHD). So far, I survived using i915.enable_rc6=0 until that parameter was removed from newer kernels, then I switched to using intel_idle.max_cstate=4. I still wish someone would find the real root cause of this issue. Today, I noticed the flickering stops

[Bug 1802090] Re: update overwrites sshd_config

2018-11-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
attached: /var/log/apt/term.log ** Attachment added: "term.log.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1802090/+attachment/5210010/+files/term.log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1802090] Re: update overwrites sshd_config

2018-11-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
The update to 18.04 was a long time ago, the problem occurred this morning... On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 13:01, Marc Deslauriers < marc.deslauri...@canonical.com> wrote: > It looks like you upgraded from Ubuntu 16.04 to Ubuntu 18.04. > >From the log file: > > Unpacking openssh-server (1:7.6p1-4) over

[Bug 1802090] Re: update overwrites sshd_config

2018-11-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
It was an automatic update, file attached ** Attachment added: "apt-term.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1802090/+attachment/5209992/+files/apt-term.log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1802090] [NEW] update overwrites sshd_config

2018-11-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
Public bug reported: The latest update for Bionic (18.04.1) either overwrote or modified my /etc/ssh/sshd_config with the result that I could no longer access my machine using ssh. A specific Port [x] line was removed and replaced by: #Port 22 This was the only change. It happened as

[Bug 1796863] Re: Upgrade to version 3.4.2 for Bionic

2018-10-24 Thread Dominic Raferd
Yes please can we have this asap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1796863 Title: Upgrade to version 3.4.2 for Bionic To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1796546] [NEW] wrong hard-coded socket location in amavisd-release

2018-10-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
Public bug reported: In amavis 2.11 the utility amavisd-release has a hard-coded location for amavisd's unix socket at line 90 as '/var/amavis/amavisd.sock' which is not aligned with the location actually set in /etc/amavis/conf.d/25-amavis_helpers where it is "/var/lib/amavis/amavisd.sock".

[Bug 1786195] Re: broken audio/muffled, no system audio

2018-09-10 Thread Dominic Anderson
The bug was not gone when using kernel 4.4 there was also an additional kernel between 4.4 and 4.15 that was available. I tried that as well. same result.no fix. Since then I backed up my system and did a completely fresh install of 18.04LTS and the issue is still not fixed. -- You received

[Bug 1786195] Re: broken audio/muffled, no system audio

2018-09-10 Thread Dominic Anderson
The bug was not gone when using kernel 4.4 there was also an additional kernel between 4.4 and 4.15 that was available. I tried that as well. same result.no fix. Since then I backed up my system and did a completely fresh install of 18.04LTS and the issue is still not fixed. -- You received

[Bug 1786195] Re: broken audio/muffled, no system audio

2018-08-09 Thread Dominic Anderson
"16.04 used kernel 4.4 and you are presently using kernel 4.15" Have been running 18.04 for a week. Until earlier today issue was not present, each day until now however, had been just fine. Is "4.15" the same kernel used at install of "18.04"? -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1786195] Re: broken audio/muffled, no system audio

2018-08-09 Thread Dominic Anderson
uname -a Linux novgorod-LinuxBook 4.4.146-0404146-generic #201808061143 SMP Mon Aug 6 15:51:56 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786195 Title:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >