[Bug 1015183]

2013-07-19 Thread Dsd-o
Peter fixed a load of stuff and it got merged in xserver master. Unfortunately there have not been any development releases of xserver master since that happened, but that will come in time. If you are still seeing problems, and are definitely using xserver master, then I suggest explaining your

[Bug 1068994]

2013-07-18 Thread Dsd-o
Peter fixed a load of stuff and it got merged in xserver master. Unfortunately there have not been any development releases of xserver master since that happened, but that will come in time. If you are still seeing problems, and are definitely using xserver master, then I suggest explaining your

[Bug 1068994]

2013-06-13 Thread Dsd-o
Thanks for all your work on this. At OLPC we've been testing the branch but have been a couple of commits behind the tip. Anyway, I think its still worth contributing the test result: no problems seen. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1015183]

2013-06-07 Thread Dsd-o
Thanks for all your work on this. At OLPC we've been testing the branch but have been a couple of commits behind the tip. Anyway, I think its still worth contributing the test result: no problems seen. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1068994]

2013-05-15 Thread Dsd-o
(In reply to comment #76) tried to bisect this, but I can't see any difference in the xev output before or after that commit. Tested several revisions after (and 3e15158985) and xev works as expected. Thanks for testing - I have now looked closer. The patch removes a field from struct

[Bug 1068994]

2013-05-15 Thread Dsd-o
(In reply to comment #80) Pushed the branch with a fix to keep the ABI, please test de12ce91d8e44ab9398e730b457e5abc8d1acbe6 Built this and can't see any problems after a quick test. I'll ship this in upcoming OLPC development builds for wider testing. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1015183]

2013-05-10 Thread Dsd-o
(In reply to comment #70) the libreoffice hint helped a lot tracking this down. New branch posted (top commit b8a2de82e36dd922843618f15703113dd556b164 dix: fix cursor refcounting ). Please give this a test. looks like my test box here is happy and valgrind doesn't see any leaks (yet) I would

[Bug 1015183]

2013-05-10 Thread Dsd-o
Yep, reproduced with HEAD b8a2de82e3, bisection identifies the first bad commit as 3e15158985. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015183 Title: Inconsistent mouse events for Acer T231H

[Bug 1015183]

2013-05-10 Thread Dsd-o
(In reply to comment #76) tried to bisect this, but I can't see any difference in the xev output before or after that commit. Tested several revisions after (and 3e15158985) and xev works as expected. Thanks for testing - I have now looked closer. The patch removes a field from struct

[Bug 1015183]

2013-05-10 Thread Dsd-o
(In reply to comment #80) Pushed the branch with a fix to keep the ABI, please test de12ce91d8e44ab9398e730b457e5abc8d1acbe6 Built this and can't see any problems after a quick test. I'll ship this in upcoming OLPC development builds for wider testing. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1068994]

2013-05-08 Thread Dsd-o
(In reply to comment #70) the libreoffice hint helped a lot tracking this down. New branch posted (top commit b8a2de82e36dd922843618f15703113dd556b164 dix: fix cursor refcounting ). Please give this a test. looks like my test box here is happy and valgrind doesn't see any leaks (yet) I would

[Bug 1068994]

2013-05-08 Thread Dsd-o
Yep, reproduced with HEAD b8a2de82e3, bisection identifies the first bad commit as 3e15158985. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068994 Title: button1 gets stuck after a while To

[Bug 1068994]

2013-05-01 Thread Dsd-o
Thanks for testing. Sugar's paint app is http://activities.sugarlabs.org /en-US/sugar/addon/4082 It is probably more meaningful to do the xev test though. Click the mouse button and hold, you would expect a ButtonPress event to show immediately, but it doesn't. And do that under sugar, in case

[Bug 1068994]

2013-05-01 Thread Dsd-o
Thanks for continuing to work on this. I believe the touch-grab-race-condition-56578-v2 patch series so far creates a problem with mouse input. In Sugar's Paint application, I can't paint anything by moving the mouse around with the button held down. Running xev, I can see that clicking and

[Bug 1068994]

2013-05-01 Thread Dsd-o
(In reply to comment #47) I believe the touch-grab-race-condition-56578-v2 patch series so far creates a problem with mouse input. In Sugar's Paint application, I can't paint anything by moving the mouse around with the button held down. Running xev, I can see that clicking and holding the

[Bug 1015183]

2013-04-27 Thread Dsd-o
Thanks for continuing to work on this. I believe the touch-grab-race-condition-56578-v2 patch series so far creates a problem with mouse input. In Sugar's Paint application, I can't paint anything by moving the mouse around with the button held down. Running xev, I can see that clicking and

[Bug 1015183]

2013-04-27 Thread Dsd-o
Thanks for testing. Sugar's paint app is http://activities.sugarlabs.org /en-US/sugar/addon/4082 It is probably more meaningful to do the xev test though. Click the mouse button and hold, you would expect a ButtonPress event to show immediately, but it doesn't. And do that under sugar, in case

[Bug 1015183]

2013-04-27 Thread Dsd-o
(In reply to comment #47) I believe the touch-grab-race-condition-56578-v2 patch series so far creates a problem with mouse input. In Sugar's Paint application, I can't paint anything by moving the mouse around with the button held down. Running xev, I can see that clicking and holding the

[Bug 1068994]

2013-04-23 Thread Dsd-o
Yes, I can see how time consuming this must be. Thanks for continuing to work on it, at OLPC we can promise you some testing once code is ready. In the mean time I will add the latest 2 patches to our development builds for further testing: Xi: Do not handle ET_TouchOwnership in

[Bug 1015183]

2013-04-19 Thread Dsd-o
Yes, I can see how time consuming this must be. Thanks for continuing to work on it, at OLPC we can promise you some testing once code is ready. In the mean time I will add the latest 2 patches to our development builds for further testing: Xi: Do not handle ET_TouchOwnership in

[Bug 1010794]

2012-10-28 Thread Dsd-o
Created attachment 69139 Backported to xserver-1.13.0 The patch wouldn't apply for me, so I reapplied it by hand to xserver-1.13.0, here it is. Now, testing on OLPC XO-1.5 using the chrome video driver, I no longer see any text corruption in the GNOME fallback applications menu. However, the