I'm now the new Debian Maintainer of it. And my sponsor uploaded today for me
the new upstream version 1.5.3 to Debian unstable.
So now only someone from Ubuntu needs to pull it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
tion source file for the GRUB module parses -l and -r and
should behave differently.
If not then it's somewhere a bug in parsing them from the commandline.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
915resolution module requires 915resolution userspace
https://
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 512245 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512245
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 512245
GRUB2 fails to set resolution
--
GRUB2 fails to set resolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512296
You received this bug notification because you a
BIOS extensions.
Use GRUB_GFXMODE in /etc/default/grub to set the resolution for GRUB.
For the Kernel you would need to copy /etc/grub.d/40_custom to for
example /etc/grub.d/05_gfxpayload and in there use:
set gfxpayload="1680x1050"
or you could try `set gfxpayload=keep' to use GRU
grub-installer (not grub-install!) to
completely avoid the question if grub2 gets installed by it.
If you want to see it (again) you have to run
sudo dpkg-reconfigure grub-pc.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
cannot boot: GRUB error symbol 'grub_puts' no
hich still works even if there's text behind the 0) but still somehow
preserve the old value.
But for that IMO it would be better to comment out the existing line and
just add a new one for less confusion.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
"save defa
anymore allow it to rebuild then in karmic due to
the same version number.
Feel free to sent me a mail in private for any questions about my PPA.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
Current grub-pc takes several minutes to show menu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
c inside the chroot
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
cannot boot: GRUB error symbol 'grub_puts' not found
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509797
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Ok so it's fix released.
If you want to have this fixed/changed in karmic you have to nominate this bug
for it.
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
installing grub2 to partition does not ask (y or n)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509438
You received this bug n
lity.
So IMO this is either Fix Released or Invalid.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
installing grub2 to partition does not ask (y or n)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509438
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
benzino I don't think you're familiar with how Ubuntu uses the LP bug status
field, since you just registered today.
This is fixed in lucid and so it's Fix Released and not Fix Commited:
Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status
My ppa doestn't contain any other fix for this which is not in
and not the Linux kernel root= parameter.
Then your submission is wrong and please fix it then.
As I said search command has nothing to do with the Linux root=
parameter.
/etc/grub.d/10_linux honours GRUB_DISABLE_LINUX_UUID.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
/etc/
D of the filesystem
which contains the file the command after search uses.
So if your /boot is a seperate partition search command uses the UUID
of /boot so GRUB can find the Linux kernel and then in the linux command
it uses for root=UUID= the UUID of your / filesystem.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud
life easier and that's why I added the
--disk-module=ata option to grub-install. To make testing easier of it.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
Grub 2 problem, error: no such device
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403408
You received this bug notification
't know how the later booted kernel and udev names the /dev/
files for your disks.
It can only use UUIDs LABEL and a file on the filesystem which the
search command already supports.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
/etc/default/grub cannot disab
We have one bug for slowness in update-grub upstream in Debian
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=508834
I'm just not sure if I should mark that one directly as *the* upstream bug for
that.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #508834
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
The problem is probable that your /boot/grub is on the external drive but the
MBR bootcode of GRUB is on the internal drive.
The installer installs GRUB by default to (hd0) which is probable your internal
drive.
The only solutions for you is to either move /boot/grub to the internal one and
then
Yes, it is not in the MBR of your SSD. With GRUB the boot flag doestn't
matter at all, as long as GRUB is installed on the MBR.
> Or is
> the long grub load time because my HDD is first boot priority and grub
> is on SSD?
Yes, if you mean that GRUB is in the MBR of your hdd and your
tartup Manager replaced grub-pc with grub was
fixed long ago already?
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
Grub2 not updated after kernel upgrade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461583
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
t; request please). The UUID refers to the boot partition on the external
> drive which contains the grub files and the os.
For now you have to type the commands of grub.cfg into GRUB's
commandline yourself to see it.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
u
Can you please be a bit more verbose?
How exactly does mkreiserfs fail?
** Changed in: reiserfsprogs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Formating with RieserFS fails..
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432595
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
Am Freitag, den 01.01.2010, 13:42 + schrieb Lancman:
> Just wondering, would I have the same issue with Mint 8 or does it
> only happen with Ubuntu?
>
It happens as long as you keep that Compaq preinstalled Windows XP.
That has nothing to do with some specific Linux Distribution.
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
Current grub-pc takes several minutes to show menu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
's fixed in my PPA and in Debian doestn't mean it's fixed
in an official Ubuntu repository.
Please see here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
Current grub-pc takes several minutes to show menu
https://bugs.
ad had 1.97+experimental.20091213-1 as version.
The 1.98~ is now used due to that.
Upstream merged this fix into the trunk branch after the latest sid
upload.
So for now you either have to use the Debian experimental package which
is also avaible via my PPA with the Ubuntu changes merged in or comp
if the ubuntu package maintainers upgrade from upstream,
> please...
>
They already did. But the updated package is only in lucid not karmic.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
'insmod uhci' crashed GRUB2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432
ny need at all to include all modules you need
directly into the grub.efi file.
Only the ones needed to access /boot/grub.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
"Failed to boot default entries." with grub-efi-amd64 upon reboot on HP 8530p
with UEFI ena
RUB Legacy style `set root=(hd,xy)' in grub.cfg and only rely on search
--fs-uuid.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
/etc/default/grub cannot disable use of UUID
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/499483
You received this bug notification because you are a m
gt; blocklist. (I guess that is what many dislike from installing into a
> partition?)
>
If you only need core.img and don't care about the MBR/bootsector code
you can use grub-install with --grub-setup=/bin/true which we use in the
postinst if you choose to chainload GRUB 2 from GRUB Legac
omething like --root-directory=
of grub-install.
Also all /etc/grub.d/* files only look in /boot/ for the kernels etc.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
failures on grub-install to create rescue boot media
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498533
You received t
grub-setup: warn: Embedding is not possible. GRUB can only be
> installed in this setup by using blocklists. However, blocklists are
> UNRELIABLE and its use is discouraged.
> grub-setup: error: Cannot read `/grub/core.img' correctly
That bug should be fixed now in lucid.
--
Felix Zielcke
IIRC the windows path for the 9x/ME versions was stored in some c:\*.sys plain
text file.
I think it was named io.sys.
This bug report is now very old, but does someone still have access to some
9x/ME system?
--
Windows not detected if /windows is called something else
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Probable this still happens with karmic.
If you still have it, could you try to find out how the normal vista differs
with your vista meant for reinstalling?
--
installer fails detecting Vista reinstall partitions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231728
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: os-prober (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
os-prober spawns interactive prompt 'Password:' and causes partial hang of
/etc/grub.d/30_os-prober
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428260
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
For making update-grub of grub2 a trigger is already requested as bug #396381
I don't see how os-prober itself could be made one
--
Should only run at most once per dpkg/apt run
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392078
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
lucid has now zfs-fuse packaged, but only in universe.
Please check if installing that fixes this.
Else 90solaris needs some other changes for the newer Solaris builds.
--
os-prober doesn't detect Solaris/OpenSolaris, especially on ZFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482102
You received this bug
This seems to be related to bug #391774
Colin Bennets gfxmenu (http://grub.gibibit.com/) has been now merged into
upstreams' experimental branch and is now avaible in my PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~fzielcke/+archive/grub-ppa/
If anyone feels like working on an official Ubuntu theme, or talk with
gfxmenu has been merged into upstreams' experimental branch and is avaible in
my PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~fzielcke/+archive/grub-ppa/
Maybe this bug and #385714 should be merged if you want to solve both
problems with a gfxmenu theme?
--
Simple changes to make the grub menu look more elegant
Please check if this still happens with newest grub2.
At least that it still appends /boot/ if you have a seperate /boot partition
should be fixed now in karmic.
--
update-grub generates an incorrect entry
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442631
You received this bug notification because you are
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 403408 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403408
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 403408
Grub 2 problem, error: no such device
--
no such device: (UUID) but i am able to boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448466
You received this bug not
The lucid package has the grub-probe check again activated.
But that will make grub-install only abort if the wrong filesystem code is used.
--
grub incorrectly identifies ext3 as fat
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463015
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Please try if this still happens with my latest PPA upload:
https://launchpad.net/~fzielcke/+archive/grub-ppa/
Note that it's the experimental branch from upstream and so could contain other
bugs.
--
grub2: 'error: no such partition' when trying to boot from hd0,10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
The seperate /boot partition problem has been now fixed.
The version I uploaded yesterday shouldn't have any big bugs.
For me it works fine and I even uploaded this by accident to Debian unstable
instead of experimental and nothing critical comed up the day it was there.
--
grub console is ridic
experimental branch supports now encrypted/hashed passwords.
See here how to use them:
http://grub.enbug.org/Authentication
My PPA has it now included:
https://launchpad.net/~fzielcke/+archive/grub-ppa/
--
grub2 doesn't support security features, such as password
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 403408 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403408
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 403408
Grub 2 problem, error: no such device
--
GRUB 2 fails to find boot partition (by uuid)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436101
You received this bug no
My PPA has upstreams' bugfix for that included:
https://launchpad.net/~fzielcke/+archive/grub-ppa/
Note that this is the experimental branch and could have other bugs.
I also attach the fix which is in Bazaar revision 1924 in trunk.
Should apply cleanly to the karmic package.
** Attachment added:
-install --root-directory=/mnt /dev/sdc
and then it uses /mnt/boot/grub instead of /boot/grub.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
beta installer left ASUS EeePC 900 unbootable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430333
You received this bug notification because you are
vice because that totally
depends on /boot/grub/device.map and that could be completely wrong.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
update to grub-pc writes MBR without checks, prompt or backup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495423
You received this bug notification
This is probable a duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/420933
--
Grub Loading. (message 15 to 25 seconds)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496650
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
debconf database for it.
If you want to change/disable that one, then run `sudo dpkg-reconfigure
grub-pc'
But as I just replied to #495423, disabling it can make your system
unbootable if the package gets upgraded and update-grub generates a
grub.cfg which isn't anymore 100% compatible with
and update-grub generates a grub.cfg
which isn't 100% compatible with the GRUB version in /boot/grub and
embeding area then maybe you can't boot. That's why we implemented this.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
update to grub-pc writes
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #554790
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554790
** Also affects: grub2 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554790
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
upgrades of the grub-pc package can overwrite
ith `sudo
grub-editenv create'
Maybe there's some way to tell the system to create the env file without
tail packing
Hm or we should just revert the change of Okuji to make it only 1024
bytes big instead of initial 8192.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 450351 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450351
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 450351
cannot start memtest86+ when /boot is a separate partition
--
memtest86+ does not run in UNR
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495927
You received this
won't do an upload in the next days in Debian as
long as nothing critical comes up.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
After 9.10 grub update can not boot into Wubi install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477104
You received this bug notification because you
ot= linux parameter has the right device or UUID of
it.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
After 9.10 grub update can not boot into Wubi install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477104
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
Oh and I'm not an Ubuntu developer so I can't do anything to help getting this
fix into karmic.
It's fixed in lucid and backporting that change would be trivial.
--
cannot start memtest86+ when /boot is a separate partition
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450351
You received this bug notificatio
Please see the official Ubuntu Documentation about the Bug Status:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status
If a bug is fixed in the current development release, it is Fix Released. If
the bug also needs to be fixed in a stable release, use the "Target to release"
link to nominate it for that release.
And you are booting from /dev/sda and not some different disk?
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
grub2 update adds --no-floppy to "search " lines
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391044
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
o dpkg-reconfigure grub-pc to see it (again).
Doing anything else is just a workaround and doestn't fix the problem
for the next time when add again something to grub.cfg which isn't
compatible with older versions of GRUB.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
grub2
; your
> change was to break the --grub-probe option again, just as the effect
> of
> my change was to break help2man. Clearly we need a compromise. Could
> you
> have a look at r1922? I think that resolves the conflict between our
> two
> changes.
Ah so I was the blind one here :)
tions there mounted.
> Is that where the grub "prefix" gets set?
It gets set in the $grub_mkimage line with the --prefix option.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
grub2 shows 'biosdisk read error', then boots
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
exception and merge GRUB 2 from unstable
instead of having to wait until we get it into testing.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
package grub-pc 1.96+20080724-12ubuntu2 failed to install on dmraid (fakeraid)
no mapping exists
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392136
Yo
ll to the correct device?
Check what `echo GET grub-pc/install_devices | debconf-communicate'
says.
To be safe that GRUB has been updated just run grub-install /dev/sda.
Of course change the device to the one your BIOS boots from.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB develope
to submit it
upstream.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #548600
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548600
** Also affects: grub2 (Debian) via
ht
fix' or just `set' in GRUB's commandline shows prefix
as a normal GRUB device (hdx,y)/boot/grub or as
(UUID=abc123...)/boot/grub
If it's UUID= it can happen that it still accesses the floppy device.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
grub2 shows
hich ends up there and is much bigger then
stage1_5 from Legacy.
Because it not only contains the filesystem module to access /boot/grub
but also the GRUB kernel with the rescue mode.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
grub fails after running Windows
https://bugs.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 441941 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441941
Am Freitag, den 04.12.2009, 16:08 +0100 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> But I suggest the following to keep GRUB 2:
> Run grub-install --force /dev/sda1 (or whatever your Ubuntu partition
> is)
> Then
sda1 (or whatever your Ubuntu partition
is)
Then install mbr package
install-mbr /dev/sda
And then use cfdisk/fdisk/gparted or so to set the boot flag on your
Ubuntu partition (the one were you ran grub-install)
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
** This bug has been
bigger.
- Make grub-installer install to the disk where /boot/grub is on,
instead of by default assuming (hd0) is the right disk.
In future hopefully debian-installer defaults to create GPT partition
tables, then it always creates a bios_grub partition and then blocklists
aren't a probl
Please check if this really happens after a boot of Windows.
If it does, then this is a duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/441941
--
[grub ver. 1.97] unbootable system - the system waiting with message "grub
loading"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492092
You rece
o you say you can't use blocklists?
As I said install GRUB to your new harddisk and then change your BIOS to
boot from it.
Or use (g)parted to resize the first partition so it starts at/after
sector 63 so that there is enough space to embed core.img
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and
t
install GRUB to the disk where your /boot/grub is on.
And then you need to check in your BIOS that it boots from that one.
I recently experienced this problem myself and we really should abort
with an error in grub-setup/grub-install if blocklists get used and you
install to a different disk then
** Bug watch added: GNU Savannah Bug Tracker #27336
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27336
** Also affects: grub via
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27336
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Unable to set multiple grub terminals using /etc/default/grub
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Currently it's not possible at all to use 2 terminals at once, even by
manual hacking of grub.cfg.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #506707
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506707
** Also affects: grub2 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=5067
Actually it doestn't matter.
It's fixed in lucid now that 20_memtest86+ finally uses
prepare_grub_to_access_device()
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
memtest86+ fails to boot when GRUB and the system filesystem are on separate
disks
https://bugs.launchpa
4.00 has been merged into lucid now
memtest86+ (4.00-2ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low
* Merge from debian testing, remaining changes:
- Makefile: Add -fno-stack-protector to CFLAGS, since this package does
not link against libc.
- debian/grub: check for existance of /usr/lib/grub/grub
just having GRUB in the MBR of a different disk then Linux is on doestn't cause
this.
Do you have a seperate /boot partition?
Then this is a duplicate of 450351 which is already fixed in lucid.
** Package changed: grub2 (Ubuntu) => memtest86+ (Ubuntu)
--
memtest86+ fails to boot when GRUB and t
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 420933 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420933
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 420933
Current grub-pc takes several minutes to show menu
--
Grub uses harddrive a lot before starting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485191
You received th
command in commandline.
But if you set a password to protect against init=/bin/bash you're also
protected against our cat command.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
grub2 - cat - security - it becomes too easy without pwd-protected grub-shell
https://bugs.lau
"Generating grub.cfg ...
No path or device is specified.
Try ``grub-probe --help'' for more information.
No path or device is specified.
Try ``grub-probe --help'' for more information."
This can only happen if you modify the use_bg=false to use_bg=true
and doing this is just wrong.
** Changed in:
It would be nice if you could try the version from my PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~fzielcke/+archive/grub-ppa
I think there are now some changes included which hopefully makes this faster
for you.
Note that there's currently a bug, that if your /boot is a seperate partition
the generated grub.cfg
drive . grub2 is
> installed
> correctly when directed to any other drive on the system either ide
> master or sata .
>
How does it fail if you run grub-install yourself?
And you use grub-install /dev/hdb and not /dev/hdb1 or some other
partition?
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Mainta
Please press `c' at the menu to go to command line and type
echo $prefix
or if you can't find $ because of the US keyboard layout we use in GRUB you can
also use just
set
If prefix contains (UUID=) then this probable is a duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/420933
My PPA contains now Vladimir's fix for this problem:
https://launchpad.net/~fzielcke/+archive/grub-ppa
But currently there's a bug if you /boot is a seperate partition then /.
The linux menu entries wrongly have /boot/ added when they should not.
--
Current grub-pc takes several minutes to show
This has been fixed in lucid.
memtest86+ (4.00-2ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low
* Merge from debian testing, remaining changes:
- Makefile: Add -fno-stack-protector to CFLAGS, since this package does
not link against libc.
- debian/grub: check for existance of /usr/lib/grub/grub-mkcon
all.
Just wishlist to remove the bash dependency at all, but I don't think we
ever do this in Debian.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
Missing dependency to bash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487456
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #540549
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=540549
** Also affects: grub2 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=540549
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
package grub-pc 1.96+20080724-12ubuntu2 failed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 392136 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392136
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 392136
package grub-pc 1.96+20080724-12ubuntu2 failed to install on dmraid
(fakeraid) no mapping exists
--
grub2 install cant recognize sata fake raid/dmrai
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 392136 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392136
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 392136
package grub-pc 1.96+20080724-12ubuntu2 failed to install on dmraid
(fakeraid) no mapping exists
--
Failed to set-up GRUB while doing a fresh install
Haven't looked since then much into it.
For me personally this isn't that important. Linux isn't on my dmraid.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
package grub-pc 1.96+20080724-12ubuntu2 failed to install on dmraid (fakeraid)
no mapping exists
https:
If this is about /etc/default/grub then it should be reassigned to ucf.
If this is about for the /etc/grub.d/* files which I doubt then this belongs to
dpkg.
Though the 3-way merge doestn't work correctly due to our way we handle
/etc/default/grub now
--
grub post-installation script shows side
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
/boot/grub or ... desktop-base required in 05_debian_theme path?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458079
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 420933 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420933
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 420933
Current grub-pc takes several minutes to show menu
--
Grub loads very slowly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485977
You received this bug notification
ally executed change the
`-e' to `-ex' in the first line of it.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
Can not disable GRUB2 background image
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485636
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
d I just tested both now to be sure.
Note that it doestn't count what update-grub outputs or 00_header says
for the real GRUB. Only /boot/grub/grub.cfg counts for it.
If there's no background_image line in it, it will never use one.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GR
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 420933 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420933
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 420933
Current grub-pc takes several minutes to show menu
--
Grub takes too much time to load
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485375
You received this bug no
tries inside /etc/grub.d/40_custom or some other file.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
Grub loading. The symbol ' ' not found. Aborted. Press any key...
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482757
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
ifying it
you could also replace the grub_dprintf with normal grub_printfs.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
grub2: 'error: no such partition' when trying to boot from hd0,10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440587
You received this bug notification bec
!
i.e. :w! or :wq! if you directly want to save and exit it.
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer
--
Unable to enable framebuffer modes with grub 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428519
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
1 - 100 of 321 matches
Mail list logo
