Ahem
I guess this bug should not have an importance rated "undecided" because, in
this moment, as we have no Java from Sun/Oracle anymore in the repositories, we
haven't ANY working Java plugin for browsers in LTS repositories
I think this is very problematic.
--
You received this bug n
Is it possible to backport this patch on Lucid?
The server version is still supported and this patch is needed, otherwise slapd
will break Kerberos KDC.
The solution of adding the "sleep 1" to the slapd init script is really
odd.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
Thank you very much Julian.
Is this fix scheduled to be backported to some older Ubuntu version (i.e. Lucid
LTS) or it will just be inserted into the upcoming release?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37621077/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37621078/Dmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37621079/DpkgTerminalLog.txt
--
pa
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: kde-i18n-it
The packages
kde-l10n-it from backports repository
and
kde-i18n-it from the standard main repository
have a conflict and cannot be installed togheter.
ProblemType: Package
AptOrdering:
kde-i18n-it: Install
kde-i18n-it: Configure
Architectur
> You can specify "Package: *" though...
This is why I opened a new bug, but no answer unitl now...
References:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/399474
--
Allow pinning based on individual PPA repository
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270817
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apt
Hello,
I added this PPA to my sources.list.d to upgrade my OpenSSH version to a newer
one:
https://launchpad.net/~rainct/+archive/ppa
I currently use Ubuntu Hardy:
$ lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS
Release: 8.04
$ apt-cache polic
Hi 'Celso',
which is the list address? Can't find it.
Thank you
--
Allow pinning based on individual PPA repository
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270817
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
Hi,
I'm using Hardy, and having the same problem till now: is the fix released for
Hardy *too*?
Thanks,
--
Allow pinning based on individual PPA repository
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270817
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
I'm sorry for the late.
It works! The 2.6.27 kernel works very well and "see" 2.9 GiB of RAM, with no
slowness problem at boot or after the boot. I attach the DMESG of the live cd
just in case it could be useful (there's a strange "bugged bios detected" that
I can't understand O_o).
And now: ho
Just downloaded/verified/burned. I'll let you know how it works with 3 GiB of
RAM tomorrow night, 8-9-2008 at 20:00 (UTC+2), more or less.
I can't install on my HD this new version 'cause I need stability now (I'm
workin' on my thesis), so I'll try it "live" (but the Hardy live doesn't start
at
Thanks to you, I'll come back if I find new informations.
Have a nice summer
--
[Hardy] 3 GiB of RAM make linux *slow*
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245222
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
Hi, I have a F3Sg, I don't remember if I have the same audio card but I need to
do these things to let the audio work, just give it a try:
1. In "System-->Administration-->Services" enable the "... (alsa-utils)" (I
have an italian Ubuntu, sorry if I'm not so precise)
2. In the file: /etc/modprobe
So you are convinced this should be a bug? Or you think that could be something
else?
To me this is the only explanation, I've tried everything but there are no
"other" reasons to such a behaviour :(
--
[Hardy] 3 GiB of RAM make linux *slow*
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245222
You received t
Done.
After a 26h test there are *no errors* displayed by memtest.
And now? :(
--
[Hardy] 3 GiB of RAM make linux *slow*
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245222
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Here I am, I've done the test with Bootchart.
As supposed I'm not so able to understand the graphs but as I can see they're
very different, also if I can't understand if mdadm is responsible for such a
different behaviour. As I can see maybe isn't a mdadm issue because the
"slowness" start very
Ok, I'll try tonight at 20:00 (GMT+1) and will post the result so you can have
a better idea of "when" is this happening (I don't know if I'm able to read
those graphs :)).
Thanks
--
[Hardy] 3 GiB of RAM make linux *slow*
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245222
You received this bug notification
Thanks for your response, can I ask why do you say that the software
RAID is the problem? It is there also when I'm using 2.5 GiB RAM and
everything goes smooth.
In addition, the "slowness" begin just a fraction of second after the
grub splash disappear, tons of log's lines before the kernel only
** Attachment added: "All logs I made"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15788233/DEBUG.tar.gz
--
[Hardy] 3 GiB od RAM make linux *slow*
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245222
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bu
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu Hardy v8.04.1
This is the hardware configuration:
MB: ASUS P4C800-E Deluxe
RAM: 4 modules of Kingston KVR400X72C3A (400 MHz, PC3200, DDR with ECC)
Actual RAM banks configuration is with 2.5 GiB disposed this way:
1GiB512MiB1GiB
and everything works fine.
If I r
20 matches
Mail list logo
