I tested that other bug. As far as I can tell it is not fixed. I
haven't gotten any sort of response on it for a week. So... now what?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524447
Title:
Could somebody tell me if I tested that correctly or not? I'd like to
get this either working or rolled back soon. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592010
Title:
hardy2lucid
I'm starting on testing this. Results in a little while.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592010
Title:
hardy2lucid upgrade: qemu-common should replace qemu as well as qemu-
kvm /
I'll go stand up some vms to test that one out.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524447
Title:
virsh save is very slow
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Ok so I spent a while at this and it does not appear to be fixed to me. I'm
not really familiar with release upgrades so it might just be my unfamiliarity,
if so someone with more understanding of what is going on will need to verify
this instead. Here's what I did.
I installed hardy server
Lucid 10.04.4 amd64 host. 2.6.32-38-server. All packages up to date.
Guest:
Win 7 64bit
1Gb RAM (all in use in guest)
2 vproc
VirtIO disk (virtio-win-0.1-22)
VirtIO network
2 IDE cdroms
VNC display
virsh save:
Michael: Yes, that is the correct patch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524447
Title:
virsh save is very slow
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Michael: Yes, that is the correct patch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524447
Title:
virsh save is very slow
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
The page you referenced doesn't include anything that I can find about
the ticket priority level. It states that Stable release updates will,
in general, only be issued in order to fix high-impact bugs and
provides several examples. Among them is Bugs which do not fit under
above categories,
The page you referenced doesn't include anything that I can find about
the ticket priority level. It states that Stable release updates will,
in general, only be issued in order to fix high-impact bugs and
provides several examples. Among them is Bugs which do not fit under
above categories,
Tested 0.12.3+noroms-0ubuntu9.14 on Lucid amd64 with all available
updates. Save speed is now approx 3 seconds for a 256Mb guest. Tested
virsh with start, stop, save, restore, suspend, resume, shutdown,
destroy. Tested guest with smp, virtio disk, virtio net, vnc display.
Everything worked as
Tested 0.12.3+noroms-0ubuntu9.14 on Lucid amd64 with all available
updates. Save speed is now approx 3 seconds for a 256Mb guest. Tested
virsh with start, stop, save, restore, suspend, resume, shutdown,
destroy. Tested guest with smp, virtio disk, virtio net, vnc display.
Everything worked as
I'd like to help get this fixed, particularly in Lucid. What can I do?
Does #21 and #22 still need testing?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524447
Title:
virsh
Ok, great! Thanks for the quick response. I did just now get finished
testing the packages you attached in #21 using my lucid box. Saves of a
256Mb guest went from ~50 seconds to ~3. So it does seem to fix the
issue. I can set up a Maverick box if you need it tested there as well.
I checked
I'd like to help get this fixed, particularly in Lucid. What can I do?
Does #21 and #22 still need testing?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524447
Title:
virsh save is very slow
To
Ok, great! Thanks for the quick response. I did just now get finished
testing the packages you attached in #21 using my lucid box. Saves of a
256Mb guest went from ~50 seconds to ~3. So it does seem to fix the
issue. I can set up a Maverick box if you need it tested there as well.
I checked
16 matches
Mail list logo
