** Bug watch added: Gentoo Bugzilla #335864
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335864
** Also affects: gentoo via
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335864
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Hylafax is sending blank pages.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580568
You re
Can also confirm this working. The system is taking longer to boot now -
who wonders: all services start now. However, I had no chance to do
excessive reboots since the machine is in production.
--
system services not starting at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172
You received this bug n
I request this being a duplicate of bug 554172.
--
[Lucid] Xorg server sometimes fails to start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584187
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.
I don't think that any workarounds could really fix this - the
workarounds just modify timing or reduce impact. I think the problem
is really much more lowlevel - device nodes that are not ready, or
events emitted by upstart in wrong order or wrong timing.
I don't want to be mean, but I'd suggest
I think the problem is that nobody really wants to take responsibility for
that. I have another bug open which describes Xorg not starting because it
cannot open the console (which is probably the same why cups does not start
sometimes). I posted this bug against upstart, but it was rejected as
pro
I suppose this has a similar cause than the current cups problem in
upstart. So it may be a duplicate of #554172.
--
[Lucid] Xorg server sometimes fails to start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584187
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
I can't remember where but I read clues about NetworkManager could be
involved:
Sometimes NM starts fast enough to initialize the "lo" net interface but
this does not create an event in upstart. Sometimes the script that
usually inits "lo" runs first and generates the event.
Something else I see
piviul, if you report th console output bug, could you please CC me or put
the link here? I think this is related to different bugs I see in upstart.
2010/6/2 Steve Langasek
> piviul,
>
> The error in your logs is this:
>
> Jun 1 19:18:43 bianchino init: rc state changed from starting to pre-st
> Also, like a someone else above, my virtual consoles,
> ctrl-alt-F[1-6], are not working so I can see how this
> is going beyond just cups like you said.
I think this (VTxx not available) is why Xorg sometimes doesn't start on
boot for me either. (see bug #584187, attached logs there)
--
cups
> Note that the proprietary nvidia X drivers load the
> associated module themselves, so there's no
> chance of a race here
Well, attached a log and it clearly says the kernel module failed... But
I think this is a remnant of a more generic problem, as the other log
shows (it fails despite no nvid
** Attachment added: "But the failsafe session sometimes cannot start either
(nvidia not involved)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49351351/Xorg.failsafe.log.old
--
[Lucid] Xorg server sometimes fails to start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584187
You received this bug notification because y
** Attachment added: "The Xorg server sometimes does not start"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49351324/Xorg.0.log.old
--
[Lucid] Xorg server sometimes fails to start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584187
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
Maybe for a similar reason the xorg-server sometimes does not start,
logging a message in Xorg.0.log about a wait timeout on VT7 or
something, as I reported in Bug #584187. (I will upload logs there
later)
--
cups not starting at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172
You received this bug
So, to further debug this: What else could be the problem? Where should
I look? Apparently I don't have remote access to the system in question,
so looking into the issue may take some time on my side.
--
[Lucid] Xorg server sometimes fails to start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584187
You rece
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: cups
Yesterday I fixed a production system which lost all printers in cups.
It looks like they have been deleted. My customer did nothing else as
usual, shutting the system down the day before and booting it up
yesterday morning. All printers were gone. I
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 524186 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524186
I can confirm this. Upgraded a production machine from 9.10 to 10.04
since Lucid is marked as LTS and I thought it would be nice step to a
long-lasting stable system. Now different instabilities show up, one o
I just posted on bgo, maybe related:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263057
To shorten this: Although I'm on gentoo, the bug is similar/the same.
And I discovered that the probability of this bug may be related to how
much work is put on the gpu while using the input device. So it still
hap
To conclude everything:
No distribution should probably ship with Ext4 as default because Ext3's
behaviour was broken and everyone relies on it. And it should not be
shipped with Ext4 as default for the same reasons while people are
warned to use XFS: Potential data loss on crashes.
So as this me
@Theodore,
> Note that the "fsync causes performance problems meme got" started
> precisely because of ext3's "data=ordered" mode. This is what causes
> all dirty blocks to be pushed out to disks on an fsync(). Using ext4 with
> delayed allocation, or ext3 with data=writeback, fsync() is actually
> THIS IS NOT A BUG!
I would consider it a bug. As far as I understood the problem is that
flushing to the filesystem does not occur in correct order. Metadata
should be flushed after data has been flushed to ensure transactional
integrity. But exactly this is what Ext4 currently does not. Hence i
I have some new information regarding this problem:
We tracked it down to a big mail sitting in the outbox of the local
folder structure. The user expected to find the mail in the outbox of
the exchange folder storage. So after deleting this mail it worked.
But the bug isn't resolved because tryi
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15411326/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15411327/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15411328/ProcStatus.txt
--
evolut
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evolution
Evolution was closed during sending the outbox. Now it's stuck telling
there is one message to send but the outbox is empty. I consider this a
bug as opposed to #179288 because evolutions idea about the sending
queue and the outbox seems to be i
23 matches
Mail list logo
