@Theodore,

> Note that the "fsync causes performance problems meme got" started
> precisely because of ext3's "data=ordered" mode. This is what causes
> all dirty blocks to be pushed out to disks on an fsync(). Using ext4 with
> delayed allocation, or ext3 with data=writeback, fsync() is actually quite 
> fast.

While that may be true (and I suppose it is ;-)) what happens to all
those users sticking to ext3 or similar fs' when "suddenly" all apps to
fsync() on every occassion?

It may not hurt ext4 performance that much but probably other fs'
performance.

I still think the solution lies somewhere between "fix the apps" and
"fix the fs". Correct me if I am wrong but I read, currently Ext4 does
(for yet unknown reasons) out-of-order flushing between data and meta
data which hopefully can be fixed without affecting performance too much
while improving integrity on crashes. Still it is important to fix the
apps which still rely on Ext3s behaviour too much.

/End of @Theodore

Side note:

I'm using XFS so Ext4 isn't my preference but this is still interesting
for me as it looks like XFS and Ext4 share the same oddities that lead
to truncated configs in e.g. KDE4. I lost my kmailrc due to this several
times, including all my filters, account settings, folder settings
etc... (btw: a situation which could be improved if KMail wouldn't work
with a single monolithic config) The situation was already present with
KDE3 and got worse with KDE4 and latest NVIDIA-drivers which is
currently a not-so-stable combination on some hardware (rock-solid on my
Intel-based system at home, pretty unstable on my AMD/Via-based system
at work). And now a clue: Also an open-source driver could have made the
system freeze - that's not a single fault of closed-source drivers. So
some of the arguments here are just irrelevant. That also holds true for
the config database vs. tiny config files arguments.

-- 
Ext4 data loss
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317781
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to