[Bug 1360086]

2015-01-31 Thread Kent-caspia
Magnus, my understanding is that you and I now have approval+ privileges in BMO. So you can make the call on approval-comm-esr31 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1360086 Title: Thunderb

[Bug 274647]

2014-10-26 Thread Kent-caspia
Where is the dataloss? "Copied message is not deleted" sounds like an extra copy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274647 Title: Thunderbird fails to perform undo operations correctly

[Bug 119899]

2013-02-26 Thread Kent-caspia
(In reply to WADA from comment #135) > Very good news for many bugs! > But one bad... No performane impact by (a)? > (Huge Mbox like [Gmail]/All Mail is very popular, and I saw a bug report by > user on slowness with 136MB Junk.msf in the past...) The changes that I am thinking of only expand th

[Bug 119899]

2013-02-26 Thread Kent-caspia
WADA: (re your comment 131): I'm pretty sure that your a) and b) are both implemented by TB 19. It is the alternatives that are quite difficult, for example your c) would require filters to handle async searches, which are quite difficult given the current architecture. -- You received this bug n

[Bug 119899]

2013-02-21 Thread Kent-caspia
Thanks for the ping, Stuart. I have not thought about this for awhile, but jumping from comment 101 to the referenced bug 363238, that bug is only implemented for Thunderbird 19 and later, so the fix would not be in the current shipping product, but would be available in the current beta. Yet tha

[Bug 1074260]

2012-11-15 Thread Kent-caspia
Comment on attachment 679311 Update message size in database on every full message download I've tested this on Erik's account, and others have tested it, and it seems to work. Code looks good as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 1074260]

2012-11-15 Thread Kent-caspia
Art (or others): if you can identify a particular message that is repeatedly downloading in gmail, it would be very helpful to either post the message in bug 805830, or send it privately to Irving or myself for analysis. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 1074260]

2012-11-15 Thread Kent-caspia
Wolfgang: I also observed this "TB redownloads either 30 or 50 messages" with the gmail account that Connor gave me, and I have one possible explanation. During the initial download with the debug version, I can see a number of cancelled downloads due to failures to acquire a folder lock here: c:/

[Bug 1074260]

2012-11-09 Thread Kent-caspia
Joris: I probably agree with you, but the problem is that we do not have a reproducible issue yet with other servers. The Zarafa server issue is real, and because a bug should be limited to one issue, at some point we will need to switch this discussion to other bugs, and declare this bug as speci

[Bug 1074260]

2012-11-09 Thread Kent-caspia
So what I am hearing is that there is an issue with TB 16.x with Zarafa servers, and that issue is resolved with Irving's patch. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074260 Title: Thunderb

[Bug 1074260]

2012-11-09 Thread Kent-caspia
Continuing with my comment 49, I'm not so sure there is an issue. Downloading of offline messages can stop after awhile, then seems to restart later, and this can appear to be redownloading unless I am really paying attention. So I am not 100% confident that "All Mail" was downloaded previously, fo

[Bug 1074260]

2012-11-09 Thread Kent-caspia
After Connor (comment 32) offered to let me test his gmail account, I loaded his account using a TB 17 beta debug build. It ran for hours (this is a massive account with >6000 messages that results in "Throttled" comments from gmail), but eventually finished. After it finished, it seemed fine. Thi

[Bug 1074260]

2012-11-08 Thread Kent-caspia
Rob: The regression range we expect is described here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=803843#c11 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074260 Title: Thunderbird heavy IMAP tra

[Bug 1074260]

2012-11-08 Thread Kent-caspia
Using Erik's server, irving and I looked at this, and came to some conclusions about root causes, at least for that server. Here are excerpts from the conversation: [08:18] rkent irving: But the issue I am looking at is much bigger than line ending counts. The debug message you added says this:

[Bug 1074260]

2012-11-08 Thread Kent-caspia
The account that Erik provided me is failing to set the offline status for any message at all. So at least the problem that he is having is reproducible, and we are investigating. I suspect there is more than one issue though, but I'll know more after I have investigated some more. -- You receiv

[Bug 1074260]

2012-11-07 Thread Kent-caspia
Connor, if you have a setup that you think that I could use to reproduce your issues, I would be happy to try that as well. Private information you can send to k...@caspia.com -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bu

[Bug 1074260]

2012-11-07 Thread Kent-caspia
Erik, could setup a test account that shows the issues that you are having (including having sample problematic emails in the folders), and then tell me what configuration I need to use to connect Thunderbird so that I can duplicate this? I would also appreciate either a detailed summary STR post,

[Bug 1074260]

2012-11-07 Thread Kent-caspia
I offered to irving to look at this, and I played around with this for a few hours, using a test mail he sent me. I really cannot reproduce anything though - but I am not really sure what I need to do to get there. It would be very helpful to me if those who are seeing this would try to create a r

[Bug 106737]

2012-10-12 Thread Kent-caspia
Created attachment 670441 Unbitrotted patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106737 Title: Renaming folder to same name but different case not allowed To manage notifications about thi

[Bug 106737]

2012-10-12 Thread Kent-caspia
Comment on attachment 645623 Proposed patch Sorry this review took so long, between critical TB 17 bugs and build problems its been hard to fit this in. Testing on Windows 7, this patch does not work. When I rename folder "test" to "Test", I end up with both "test" and "Test" in the folder pane.

[Bug 885525]

2012-09-18 Thread Kent-caspia
dlech, I've asked irving to comment on your proposal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885525 Title: Deleting a Gmail Message Always Sends Item to [Gmail]/Trash To manage notifications

[Bug 701090]

2011-08-01 Thread Kent-caspia
Well the good news is that your STR was very clear, and that is often the key to progress. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701090 Title: Thunderbird will not move junk mail to junk fol

[Bug 701090]

2011-08-01 Thread Kent-caspia
"Move new junk messages to" applies to messages that are automatically determined to be junk. From your STR, there is no training, hence no messages can be determined to be junk. I think what you want to set is Tools/Options/Security/Junk/"When I mark messages as junk: Move them to the account's "

[Bug 701090]

2011-06-14 Thread Kent-caspia
I have seen similar reports to those of the reporter in the past, that junk mail does not move, frequently with unknown cause. In fact bug 487610, which the reporter states as causing a regression here, fixed one such case (where adaptive controls were not enabled.) Looking at that patch, I don't s