sun-javadb-* (version 10.3) obsoletes sun-java6-javadb (version 10.2).
We hope to have the difference made clearer in the next spin.
--
FeatureFreeze exception request for sun-javadb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192887
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Thanks, all!
Just to be sure: this bug has (at least) two acks, and the package on
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=sun-javadb got two (though
only one shows up in the table) and is ready for upload.
Since I am not a MOTU, I will just leave it to a MOTU to do the upload
and complete the
Updated package on REVU:
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=sun-javadb
--
[needs-packaging] Add Java DB packages for Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188962
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
Updated package on REVU:
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=sun-javadb
--
FeatureFreeze exception request for sun-javadb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192887
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
Thanks, Matthias and Stefan!
First: building from source is not an option at the moment, but possibly
later (e.g for 8.10) because:
* Java DB is (currently) only distributed as a rebrand of the the
Derby binary distribution ("build once, run anywhere"...)
* Building from source would require
Updated package on REVU: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=sun-
javadb
--
FeatureFreeze exception request for sun-javadb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192887
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
Updated package on REVU.
--
[needs-packaging] Add Java DB packages for Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188962
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
>From the above and a separate mail thread also involving glassfish, I
gather these are the points various comments refer to - please correct
me if I miss anything:
1. Missing binary dependencies: should have dependency on the package
"java2-runtime" and optionally suggest sun-java5-jre | sun-java
sun-java6-javadb has version 10.2.2 of Java DB. sun-java6 is based on
the DLJ tarball bundle of Sun's JDK 6 which contained Java DB in a db/
subdirectory. Packaged versions of Java 6 include the original Java DB
product packages, which for debian/ubuntu would be the proposed sun-
javadb packages w
I am currently in India with limited bandwidth, so just some quick notes
- I am not sure I am ready to move this to REVU just now, as I am not
comfortable that I have been able to communicate what Java DB (or Derby)
is ;) (sorry about that...)
It is *not just a library*. It is the leading [open
Sorry if the future came across in a worrying way :)
No, rather the opposite: the target is to consolidate the use of Java DB on
just sun-javadb, which - in the hopefully near future - will make it
unnecessary for others to bundle their own copies. For Java DB, this is the
only request you will
Stefan, I hope my above expansion is a better basis for you to assess
this: Java DB is not just a library to be included by other products, it
is a full featured database product in its own right :)
--
FeatureFreeze exception request for sun-javadb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192887
You recei
I would like to point out that Java DB is not just a library for use
under the covers of other applications. Java DB is a full-featured
database in its own right, I would definitely say the leading Java
database out there - from the introductory paragraph:
"Java DB is Sun's supported distribution
Not but on product/project, FYI only.
** Changed in: glassfish
Status: New => Invalid
--
FeatureFreeze exception request for sun-javadb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192887
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
This is a FYI.
--
FeatureFreeze exception request for sun-javadb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192887
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
*** Proposed change
Add new sun-javadb package - see
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=sun-javadb.
Since the package is new and there are no dependencies on it, there is no
impact to the distribution other than having this new package available.
*** Rationale
The
New upload after review:
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=sun-javadb
--
[needs-packaging] Add Java DB packages for Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188962
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bu
** Description changed:
Requesting the addition of Java DB packages for Hardy:
* Package names (6): sun-javadb-*
* License: Apache 2.0
- * Source: http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/bits/ubuntu/
+ * Source: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=sun-javadb
--
[needs-packaging] Ad
Package is now on REVU:
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=sun-javadb
--
[needs-packaging] Add Java DB packages for Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188962
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
Lars Heill wrote, On 02/06/08 18:20:
> Daniel Holbach wrote, On 02/06/08 11:14:
>> debian-changelog-file-is-a-symlink is a CDBS bug I believe and only a
>> warning, so nothing to worry about. Pbuilder shouldn't fail building it
>> because of that.
>>
>> If al
Lars Heill wrote, On 02/07/08 15:18:
> Lars Heill wrote, On 02/06/08 18:20:
>> Daniel Holbach wrote, On 02/06/08 11:14:
>>> debian-changelog-file-is-a-symlink is a CDBS bug I believe and only a
>>> warning, so nothing to worry about. Pbuilder shouldn't fail
Lars Heill wrote, On 02/07/08 15:27:
> Lars Heill wrote, On 02/07/08 15:18:
>> Lars Heill wrote, On 02/06/08 18:20:
>>> Daniel Holbach wrote, On 02/06/08 11:14:
>>>> debian-changelog-file-is-a-symlink is a CDBS bug I believe and only a
>>>> warning, so
Daniel Holbach wrote, On 02/07/08 16:11:
> Sorry for the confusion. Forget what I wrote about the native package.
Thanks for all your kind help, Daniel!
I have just completed a new set of packages that lintian (hardy) sanctions.
The are still at http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/bits/ubuntu/, if you
Daniel Holbach wrote, On 02/06/08 11:14:
> debian-changelog-file-is-a-symlink is a CDBS bug I believe and only a
> warning, so nothing to worry about. Pbuilder shouldn't fail building it
> because of that.
>
> If all fails, try to upload to PPA:
> http://help.launchpad.net/PPAQuickStart - your pag
Daniel Holbach wrote, On 02/05/08 08:33:
> - debian/changelog:
> - 10.3.2.1-1 -> 10.3.2.1-0ubuntu1
> - "Closes: #188962" -> (LP: #188962)
> - debian/control
> - Should sun-javadb-client be in section: libs and sun-javadb-common in docs?
> - You can use the new Homepage: field in the source stan
Public bug reported:
Requesting the addition of Java DB packages for Hardy:
* Package names (6): sun-javadb-*
* License: Apache 2.0
* Source: http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/bits/ubuntu/
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Lars Heill (lars-heill)
Status
26 matches
Mail list logo
