** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150866
Title:
dpkg crashed with signal 7
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubunt
The real error is:
Preparing to replace openoffice.org-common 1:3.2.0-7ubuntu4.1 (using
.../openoffice.org-common_1%3a3.2.0-7ubuntu4.2_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement openoffice.org-common ...
dpkg-deb (subprocess): error in buffer_read(stream): failed to write to pipe in
copy: Input/output e
I tried this in a Debian sid chroot with dpkg 1.15.8.10 and cannot
reproduce the problem (but I'm not using aufs). Can you try with a newer
version like the one in natty ?
If you can still reproduce it, please attach an strace:
strace -o log -f start-stop-daemon --start --pidfile /dev/null --start
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
This report has nothing to do with dpkg. Reassigning to the kernel.
** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752165
Title:
Blank Screen in N
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 545790 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545790
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 545790
package PACKAGE failed to install/upgrade: error writing to '': Success
* You can subscribe to bug 545790 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchp
This is a bug in udev only... if udev wants to diverts its own file it
must not use "--package udev" otherwise it instructs dpkg to divert the
file EXCEPT when it's provided by udev (which it does). So in reality
the replacement /sbin/udevadm is only there for a short time and
overwritten by the ne
k):
subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
So this is a bug in ubuntustudio-audio.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)
** Also affects:
dpkg might fail, that doesn't meant that the problem is in dpkg, It's
probably in one of the package that the installer tried to install. But
you have attached absolutely no log so that it's difficult to pin-point
the source of the problem. In the mean time reassigning it to ubiquity
as they might
What were you doing when you got this error?
What APT frontend were you using (among update-manager, synaptic,
software-center) ?
This log makes it clear that the problem is on the frontend really.
Because the packages are configured in the second dpkg run and it tries
to configure them again on
The real error is:
dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting:
files list file for package 'libcairo2' is missing final newline
This is a file corruption problem. Drop
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libcairo2.list and reinstall libcairo2.
Did something special happen? Did your computer loose power during an
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 744487 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744487
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 744487
package libc-bin 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.8 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage:
package libc-bin is already installed and configured
* You can subscribe t
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 744487 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744487
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 744487
package libc-bin 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.8 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage:
package libc-bin is already installed and configured
* You can subscribe t
The errors are:
Thread 32 terminated abnormally: internal error: failed: cd debian/tests
/runtests-arch-i386/runtests-arch-i386-1.0 && dpkg-buildpackage
-rfakeroot -us -uc -d -iNEVER_MATCH_ANYTHING -INEVER_MATCH_ANYTHING
>../build.runtests-arch-i386 2>&1
Thread 26 terminated abnormally: internal
Without any indication of how you got into this situation, this
bugreport cannot be acted upon. Marking it as invalid.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 252900 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252900
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 252900
vfat : wubi 8.04.1-rev506 kernel upgrade fails
* You can subscribe to bug 252900 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/wubi/+bug/252900/+
dpkg has all the mappings in /usr/share/dpkg/archtable (and related).
You can extend it if you wish... but this bug report is not a bug given
that you use a non-official compiler.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
The most likely explanation is that this is not a directory on the
user's system due some mismanipulation or corruption.
Thus marking as invalid.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
Package dependencies ensure such problem do not happen, you likely have
upgraded dpkg with some --force options. But you don't provide any log
of the upgrade so we don't know whether APT or another tool has done
something wrong (rather than you).
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New =>
There's no information that can be used to understand what lead to the
crash. No way to reproduce it either. This bug can not be acted upon,
marking it as incomplete.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
This has been fixed in dpkg 1.15.0
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254382
Title:
update-alternatives does not remove li
Can anyone verify if you still have the problem with a recent version
like the one in maverick or natty?
If yes, please switch the status back to confirmed.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
If update-rc.d was making multiple package fail you probably had a non-
standard update-rc.d installed. Where did it come from? Or maybe it was
a bug in the official update-rc.d at that time but it has been fixed in
the mean time.
Marking as incomplete.
** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) => ubuntu
The initial analysis was right, the package is corrupted (shorter than
what it should be). Not a dpkg bug, so marking it as invalid.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
The database is corrupted, one file is missing and another one appears
to have been replaced by device file ?!
The assertion error is likely a problem of the corrupted database that
makes it impossible to configure any package. Unless we learn how we got
into this situation, this bug report can't
I can't reproduce this with a recent dpkg-source with the very same
source package. And dbus-1.1.20/debian/patches/03_fix_inotify.patch is a
real file in that source package. So patch must have also created the
backup file. Maybe it was a bug in the patch command too... marking as
incomplete as I c
** Tags added: patch-forwarded-upstream
** Tags removed: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741433
Title:
Adding tests and :native to libdpkg-perl architecture qualifier
parsing
The broken entry looks like this:
Depends: gconf2 (>= 2.10.1-2), gstreamer0.10-gnomevfs,
gstreamer0.10-plugins-base, gstreamer0.10-plugins-good, hal, libart-2.0-2 (>=
), libatk1.0-0 (>= ), libbonobo2-0 (>= ), libbonoboui2-0 (>= 2.15.1), libc6 (>=
2.4), libcairo2 (>= ), libcdio7, libdbus-1-3 (>=
Upstream doesn't impose anything. ubuntu has made the choice to keep
that setting via the Dpkg::Vendor infrastructure. Thus marking it as
wontfix for dpkg.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
The underlying problem is that debconf is not working in that apt run.
It's definitely not a dpkg bug. In fact it looks like a user problem
where the update is run without X support while debconf requires it.
Possibly an old update-manager or debconf problem.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
St
If dpkg fails with a SIGSEGV, it has no chance to report any failures
since it's instantly killed. It happens that apt asks you to fix up the
situation with "dpkg --configure -a" but it's not broken if it properly
ask you to run this.
Can you show us what the failure look like ? (And reset the sta
The required support already exists with triggers. There's no need for
any improvement to dpkg. Marking this bug as invalid for dpkg.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
Recent versions of update-alternatives properly support the --quiet
option.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196817
update-alternatives rightfully fails if the directory where the
alternative must be installed doesn't exist. I don't see any improvement
idea here. Besides update-alternatives has been rewritten and made more
sensible in many situations since the time this bug has been reported.
** Changed in: dpk
Fixed upstream in commit fb08b88f65d57baa742f33e8e6ec36a772fe801a and
available in dpkg >= 1.14.16.3.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
This has been fixed upstream in dpkg 1.15.8.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118180
Title:
Pbuilder gives a different m
The problem is not in dpkg. Some files had chattr +i either voluntarily
or due to filesystem corruption. Marking the bug as invalid.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Betz Stefan (encbladexp) => (unassigned)
--
You recei
This is not a dpkg bug. The underlying bug has already been fixed
apparently. Closing it.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
There's no usable log attached to this bug report so we don't know what
went wrong. Please post a log of the failed upgrade.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
While dpkg can throw out errors about decompression, this can only
happen during --unpack and not during --configure. The error message is
clear, the problem lies in one of the programs executed by the the post-
installation script. There's only update-initramfs in there so that must
be the culprit
Thanks for the report, I have fixed this in the upstream repository
(commit 6a7a20c72325a57762e34f5dbb9f79ba73b5d496). It's Ubuntu-specific
at this point because the regression has been introduced in the 1.16
development cycle.
(I mark this bug as fix released and not fix committed because I have
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669282
Title:
package x11-xkb-utils 7.5 1 [modified: usr/share/doc/x11-xkb-
utils/ch
The base problem is a broken statoverride file, gnokii probably
registers an entry and doesn't clean it up properly on removal.
To the submitter, you can drop lines with "gnokii" in
/var/lib/dpkg/statoverrides and your problem should be gone.
Reassigning properly.
** Package changed: dpkg (Ubunt
This is weird, liblouis-data is show has being installed and unpacked in
the log. Yet at the end we have an error message while trying to read
its file list. And the status file attached does not contain any entry
for liblouis-data.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Somehow I doubt we would have so many duplicates if it was only
triggered by a system crash... I wonder if the disconnect between's
APT's view and dpkg's view doesn't come from some event that is not
reported via the status fd (or reported but ignored/missed by APT).
Or maybe dpkg itself being stu
This is usually the sign of a corrupted file. Redownload the file and
retry the installation.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/7
Reassigning to initramfs-tools but it's likely a broken system where
/bin/udevinfo is missing.
** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) => initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
This is because it uses sync() instead of fsync(). This has been fixed
in recent versions of dpkg (in natty at least).
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
If you have the problem only with the available file, run sudo dpkg
--clear-avail and you'll be done.
Otherwise report the problems to the persons who provided those packages
with bad versions. No package in Debian and Ubuntu use such versions.
But this is not a bug in dpkg, closing the report.
*
Input/output error is not the fault of dpkg, you probably have an
underlying hardware problem with your disk.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
As far as dpkg goes, this problem is fixed. And there's nothing we can
do if the user installs an incompatible version in the PATH.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #9771
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
There's not much we can do to improve dpkg on btrfs. There's an option
--force-unsafe-io if you want to get rid of fsync() on installed files
but it will still use fsync() on the internal DB.
Those calls are
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 616500
package openoffice.org-style-human 1:3.2.0-7ubuntu4.1 failed to
install/upgrade: package openoffice.org-style-human is already installed and
configured
*
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 616500
package openoffice.org-style-human 1:3.2.0-7ubuntu4.1 failed to
install/upgrade: package openoffice.org-style-human is already installed and
configured
*
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst is not wrong because that's after a chroot
("createinstaller-complex/install")... but I don't get why it fails.
Any way, can you try with a more recent dpkg? There have been lots of
changes and your problem might have been fixed.
--
You received this bug notificatio
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 586537
package linux-image-generic 2.6.32.22.23 failed to install/upgrade: package
linux-image-generic is already installed and configured
** This bug has been m
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 541595 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541595
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 541595
[Master] package failed to install/upgrade: package is already installed and
configured
* You can subscribe to bug 541595 by following this link:
htt
801 - 900 of 914 matches
Mail list logo
