(Does a dist-upgrade go from 19.10 to 19.10.1 or do I need to do a
reinstall?)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848790
Title:
USB not working under arm64 on Pi4 with 4G ram
To manage
Super!
Thanks for your effort Hui, Brian, and anybody else who worked on this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848790
Title:
USB not working under arm64 on Pi4 with 4G ram
To manage
I find in the main download pages
(http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/19.10/release) "ubuntu-19.10.1
-preinstalled-server-arm64+raspi3.img.xz" of date Dec3 (16:50) - does
that build include this bug-correction?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
@juliank: how can I get this fix in my ubuntu 17.04 in order to be able
to upgrade to 17.10?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744722
Title:
Unknown bad source brings up during 'zesty'
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1630522 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1630522
The other bug report still is marked as private. When I click on it,
bugs.launchpad.net says 'Bug 1630522 can not be found'
Please make it public or cpoy/paste some workaround from there over here
(prefer t
+1
I would appreciate a possible folder-structure because I have quite some FTP
and other external links for many different factories/companies I work for:
grouping per factory would simplify my work quite a bit!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
Tried it two times. The third time, moved the SATA-connection of the
boot disk before the 4 other disks, so the installation HDD becomes sda:
this installation succeeded.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Public bug reported:
disks sda through sdd are GPT disks (for zfs). disk sde is the system
boot disk, but grub wants to install on sda at first... bios is set to
boot from sde...
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: ubiquity 2.12.16
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-17.28-generi
id a wrong
interpretation of the first colon and tried to use password as a port
number... (?)
what do you say?
--
Stephan van Ingen
http://stephanvaningen.net
--
Me transmitte sursum, Caledoni!
On 4 October 2010 12:05, Michael Vogt wrote:
> Thanks for your bugreport.
>
> Could you please
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: update-manager
During upgrade I've got the message:
Invalid package information
After your package information was updated the essential package
'ubuntu-minimal' can not be found anymore.
This indicates a serious error, please report
Same message. Program asked me to send this file: see attachment
** Attachment added: "content of /var/log/dist-upgrade"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/631426/+attachment/1630829/+files/dist-upgrade.zip
--
Upgrade 10.04 -> 10.10 failed due to "the essential pac
After I stop and re-start the client it does connect and shows a
notification-balloon with something like "Ubuntu one is now updating the
client", and it actually does update: files are sync'd now...
--
Nautilus plugin has "connect" button, icon says connected and up to date
https://bugs.launchpa
I have it with 1.0.3-0ubuntu1
Cloud-icon shows as if connected. Tray-icon shows option 'Disconnect', nautilus
shows option 'Connect' (which doesn't do anything), but file which I uploaded
via the web-interface of ubuntu-one on another computer is not downloaded on
the computer running this clien
I think on my machine this was only back then,
maybe a 'one-off' during a software transition period? ...
--
Stephan van Ingen
http://stephanvaningen.net
--
2009/1/29 jhaiduce :
> I don't know about anyone else, but I haven't seen this in a couple
> months at least
Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> eject cd does not work anymore in 8.10 beta
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283962
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
--
--
Stephan van Ingen
Freelance IT
(IBM Power, Delphi, Ubuntu, RPG, Co
Were can we address this to upgrade the version of the repository?
--
I un-installed the version from the repository.
I downloaded gadmin-proftpd_0.3.5-2_i386.deb from
http://debian.cs.binghamton.edu/debian/pool/main/g/gadmin-proftpd/ and than
one works, so just move the version upstream to the U
How sad my feedback here is: "the comments confirm the contrary :-("
2008/11/5 Ermenegildo Fiorito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> People from the Obama campaign have said that they use Ubuntu 8.04. It
> seems to be used nationally.
>
> http://boredandblogging.com/2008/10/21/obama-ubuntu/
>
> --
> Microso
Who to address to get this version in the Ubuntu-repository?
2008/11/5 Christian Kirbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Confirming the issue and confirming that installing
>
> http://debian.cs.binghamton.edu/debian/pool/main/g/gadmin-proftpd/gadmin-proftpd_0.3.5-2_i386.deb
> fixes all my problems.
>
> --
That is indeed possible, didn't see that one coming ;)
2008/11/4 Sameer D. Sahasrabuddhe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Even if each user has his/her own .gvfs, it can still be mounted as
> /tmp/gvfs-username! A lot of gnome utilities already do that, so it won't be
> a big deal. And of course, there sh
If it is not necessary that each user has its own ./gvfs, than that indeed
is a good workaround
2008/11/4 Shirish Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Philip,
> Thanx. I would be happy with that outcome :)
> --
> Regards,
> Shirish Agarwal
> This email is licensed under
> http://cre
I un-installed the version from the repository.
I downloaded gadmin-proftpd_0.3.5-2_i386.deb from
http://debian.cs.binghamton.edu/debian/pool/main/g/gadmin-proftpd/ and than one
works, so just move the version upstream to the Ubuntu-repository and close
this: right?
--
gadmin-proftpd crashes o
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 269909 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269909
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18823844/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18823845/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment adde
This started happening after I added this line to the Device-section in
/etc/X11/xorg.conf:
Option "TexturedVideo" "Off"
(This was added to prevent flickering of video streaming in combination
with compiz enabled...)
--
compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in eventLoop()
https://bugs.launchpad
word
2008/10/16 deletarus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Unfortunately we are all well aware of this bug.
>
> As most of you probably already know, it is quite easy to convert anyone
> to Linux, simply tell them there are no viruses, and install it on their
> computer, they instantly feel at home once yo
Public bug reported:
I upgraded to 8.10 Intrepid yesterday evening. Today (20081015,
20:00CET) I did a partial upgrade and I'm up-to-date to everything at
this moment I believe.
When I press the eject button on the cd-reader (Audio-CD's) The CD is
not ejected. I need to eject it repeatedly before
probably I installed package "virtualbox-2.0" and you "virtualbox-ose" and
that could cause the described difference. Close this down?
--
Stephan van Ingen
Freelance IT
(IBM Power, Ubuntu, RPG, Cobol, ILE, php, databases)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
2008/10/8 Daniel Stoyanov <
is is the binary vboxdrv
in /etc/init.d not the same object as should be for 2.0.2?
--
Stephan van Ingen
Freelance IT
(IBM Power, Ubuntu, RPG, Cobol, ILE, php, databases)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
2008/10/6 Daniel Stoyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> As I have mentioned in my bug report
My command gives this result:
Usage: /etc/init.d/vboxdrv
{start|stop|stop_vms|restart|force-reload|status|setup}
I assume you have an earlier version of VirtualBox running: I suggest you
upgrade that to 2.0.2 first,
--
Stephan van Ingen
Freelance IT
(IBM Power, Ubuntu, RPG, ILE, php
Yes it is related to upgrade. Run:
*sudo /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup*
What's the result?
--
Stephan van Ingen
Freelance IT
(IBM Power, Ubuntu, RPG, ILE, php, databases)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
2008/10/5 Daniel Stoyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This issue is back again for me, I ha
So, I ran this:
*sudo /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup*
... and my Virtualbox as running again with the new kernel-version.
So: is this now still a bug or just a
virtualbox-startup-check-improvement-opportunity (or how do I phrase that?
;-))
ciao,
Stephan.
--
Stephan van Ingen
Freelance IT
(IBM
urther to get an accurate diagnosis :)
--
Stephan van Ingen
Freelance IT
(IBM Power, Ubuntu, RPG, ILE, php, databases)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
2008/9/29 Daniel Stoyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi Stephan did you try to purge the package and then reinstall it (as
> described above), thi
I have the impression that the problem came up at the moment I received a
kernel update via apt/update manager: is that plausible?
I rebooted with previous version of linux kernel, and Virtualbox started
without problems.
To my understanding this bug needs to be forwarded to Sun/Innotek to
tell
That's a conrete constructive suggestion: *organize this*! If hundreds of
volunteers spend a few minutes per day being active on such a 'channel' this
can be revolutionary! :-)
I join, *show me how*
2008/7/9 jawahar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> @Ordcestus
>
> I am writing from India.
>
> I'd like to pro
what about --exclude=~/.gvfs ?
2008/6/5 Chris Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am by no means an expert in development, but I've been getting around
> this by adding --exclude "/home/.../.gvfs". It's worked, although it's a
> pain to backup more than one home account at a time. I'm not sure if
> th
Should xenman not be built to a binary ubuntu package and then be placed
on the archive.ubuntu.com-sites, together with that the package info
from the deb sources need to be updated to include xenman: who can do
that?
--
hardy: ubuntu-xen-desktop ist missing xenman and cannot be installed
https:/
I like these tactics! I do kind-of these confrontations in shops too :-)
2008/4/28 Srikrishna Das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, atleast I didn't get a high end linux laptop on a search of about
> 1 month.
>
> At last, I bought an Acer 4315. Any company who claims to be selling linux
> models are d
great :-)
2008/4/7 Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> the bug has been fixed upstream now
>
> ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
> Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
>
> --
> gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slist_remove()
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122590
> You received thi
atheoi / Conrad:
I completely agree with you, apart from *all the hard work of all the
persons working on the 'background'*, a breakthrough of Linux/Ubuntu to the
foreground is indeed for a huge part "*just a matter of marketing*"
So go for it!
- Go to your *local* computer hardware store and sugg
I had an 'Adjust Time&Date' open in one Workspace and opened date->Preferences
in another, while the first window was updating and installing NTP (almost
finished I think), I pressed 'Time settings' in the other window... then, bang
(could not re-create)
--
gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in
Sorry about the delay, I guess the dependancies solved themself in consecutive
updates of alfa/beta releases during future updates... (see below '--' for
aptitude output). Close this bugreport as invalid?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo aptitude install tomboy
[sudo] password for stephan:
Reading p
Problems with my Dell Latitude D520 too.
--
I installed xrandr and grandr... cloning works (allthough the menu bar on the
notebook display renders to the screen size of the monitor display), but I
cannot get extended desktop enabled, not with xrandr cli,
--
Using grandr gui tool, I see the radio
http://stephanvaningen.net/index.php?title=My_Ubuntu_hitlist!
Next to this I keep telling anybody who asks support for his Windows
installation that I can not help him/her because it costs a lot of
time and I do not want to keep illegal installation running. I then
kindly invite them to try Ubuntu
This was a result of a regular update via the update-manager in gnome
--
package tomboy 0.9.7-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197139
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12335951/Dependencies.txt
--
package tomboy 0.9.7-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197139
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tomboy
Similar to the crash reports of 0.9.4 etc, this appeared in 0.9.7 also...
1) I use now: 8.04 alfa3, upgraded to 2008-02-29
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Mar 1 00:30:04 2008
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04
ErrorMessage:
ErrorMessag
I got a similar report "package f-spot 0.4.2-0ubuntu2 failed to
install/upgrade: " i.o. 0.4.0
--
package f-spot 0.4.0-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146745
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
46 matches
Mail list logo
